Father, Daughter Charged In West Side...

Father, Daughter Charged In West Side Slaying | WBNS-10TV, Central Ohio News

There are 34 comments on the 10TV WBNS story from Mar 3, 2011, titled Father, Daughter Charged In West Side Slaying | WBNS-10TV, Central Ohio News. In it, 10TV WBNS reports that:

A man and his daughter have been charged in connection with a west side slaying that apparently began with an argument about a dog.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at 10TV WBNS.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
RLB

Lakewood, OH

#1 Apr 12, 2011
10TV is unfair they took one side over the other in the Bailey case.
they listen too the Dillon family and not the Bailey's.
they condemed the Bailey's and found them guilty without any proof.
why do we need the courts when we have Chanell 10.
Is 10TV god they thank so.
If 10TV keeps condeming the Bailey's then the Bailey's need to SUE 10TV...
RLB

United States

#2 Apr 15, 2011
Who is the real victim here?
they say that they are going to plant a tree in honor of Dillon.
but who is the real victim Dillon or the Bailey's?
Dillon was not being attacked by the Bailey's dog they was in the house.
Dillon attacked Fallon Bailey hitting her in the head with a gun then waited for her to come back out with her Dad Robert Bailey.
then he attacked Mr. Bailey with a bike hitting him in the head with it then he started hitting Fallon Bailey with a bike chain after he jumped on top of Mr. Bailey that was still on the ground beating him with his gun.
after Dillon was shot then he went across the street and fail to the ground, thats when Dillon's family and friends came out tampered with the evidence and hiding the gun.
Dillon's own nephew said that they are bad people in this world and his uncle is one of them and he's no better for letting the victims of his uncle to set in jail and 10tv is allowing the truth to go unheard and allowing the victim's to be punished
Robert Dillon is BURNING in Hell right now for all of his crimes!
.and the Bailey's is being punished for being victim's.
RLB

United States

#3 Apr 15, 2011
I'm sorry for saying that Robert Dillon isburning in hell
Jack Slater

Hilliard, OH

#4 Apr 15, 2011
RLB wrote:
Who is the real victim here?
they say that they are going to plant a tree in honor of Dillon.
but who is the real victim Dillon or the Bailey's?
Dillon was not being attacked by the Bailey's dog they was in the house.
Dillon attacked Fallon Bailey hitting her in the head with a gun then waited for her to come back out with her Dad Robert Bailey.
then he attacked Mr. Bailey with a bike hitting him in the head with it then he started hitting Fallon Bailey with a bike chain after he jumped on top of Mr. Bailey that was still on the ground beating him with his gun.
after Dillon was shot then he went across the street and fail to the ground, thats when Dillon's family and friends came out tampered with the evidence and hiding the gun.
Dillon's own nephew said that they are bad people in this world and his uncle is one of them and he's no better for letting the victims of his uncle to set in jail and 10tv is allowing the truth to go unheard and allowing the victim's to be punished
Robert Dillon is BURNING in Hell right now for all of his crimes!
.and the Bailey's is being punished for being victim's.
We're all victims in this situation. Not just the Baileys, but the Dillons too. And yes, 10 tv is blowing this whole thing way out of proportion. Hell, we don't even need a judge, 10 tv has already found the Baileys guilty. They're not listening to what we, the Baileys have to say, they're only drawing conclusions based on half truths and whole lies. And RLB, you're adding insult to injury when you say shít like that.
NEWSFLASH

Findlay, OH

#5 Apr 22, 2011
I'M NOT SURE WHY YOU ARE ATTACKING 10TV. 6 WTVN CALLED FARRON A LIAR AND PLAYED HER 911 TAPE, THEY ALONG WITH FOX 28 INTERVIEWED THE DILLON FAMILY. ARE YOU MAD BECAUSE 10TV STILL HAS A CLIP UP? OR ARE JUST JUST TAMPERING WITH POTENTIAL JURORS?
THE WAY I SEE IT IS ALL THREE WERE IN THE WRONG. THIS IS THE MENTALITY OF THE WEST SIDE. EVERYONE WANTS TO ACT LIKE HARDASSES. DILLON SHOULD HAVE CALLED THE COPS, THE BAILEY'S SHOULD HAVE CALLED THE COPS. YOU SAY THE DOGS WERE INSIDE BUT FOX 28 PLAYED THE 911 TAPE AND FARRON BAILEY SAID HE WAS ATTACKING HER DOGS. YOU THEN GO ON TO MAKE DILLON OUT TO BE AN AWFUL HUMAN BEING. BUT DILLON AND THE BAILEYS ALL HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD.
THE REPORTS FROM 10TV HAVE BEEN VERY FAIR AND HAVE ONLY QUOTED THE POLICE REPORTS. WHILE FOX 28 AND 6 WTVN HAS COME RIGHT OUT AND CALLED FARRON A LIAR. YOU REALLY NEED TO PAY ATTENTION AND THINK FOR YOURSELF.
RLB

United States

#6 Apr 27, 2011
A lie is a lie no matter who writes it so if you want the truth then most of the time you can depend on channel 4
RLB

Lakewood, OH

#7 May 2, 2011
Why didn't 10tv's report show that the Police report said that Robert Dillion had a gun? WHY don't 10tv tell the whole story? Why just the Dillion's side?
Why is 10tv trying to convict the Bailey's?, Why do they hate the Bailey's?
Can the Bailey's get a fair trial?
Steely Dan

Columbus, OH

#8 May 2, 2011
Based on their past behavior,(as evidenced by their criminal records), this case is a slam dunk. Send them away for the rest of their lives.

If I was riding a bike in this part of town, I'd sure as HELL be packing some heat on myself. So, the stupid dog attacks Mr. Dillon and he's supposed to just play "chew toy" for these dogs that already have s history with the police? Really?

I'd love to hear your logic about that one RLB. Please enlighten us. Have you personally been a chew toy for a vicious animal?

Your ignorant posts are nothing but a distraction from the truth. Justice will prevail, based on the overwhelming evidence.

I have nothing to do with the westside, or anyone involved. I just find it amazing that anyone is trying to defend these people.
RLB

United States

#9 May 3, 2011
Steely Dan wrote:
Based on their past behavior,(as evidenced by their criminal records), this case is a slam dunk. Send them away for the rest of their lives.
If I was riding a bike in this part of town, I'd sure as HELL be packing some heat on myself. So, the stupid dog attacks Mr. Dillon and he's supposed to just play "chew toy" for these dogs that already have s history with the police? Really?
I'd love to hear your logic about that one RLB. Please enlighten us. Have you personally been a chew toy for a vicious animal?
Your ignorant posts are nothing but a distraction from the truth. Justice will prevail, based on the overwhelming evidence.
I have nothing to do with the westside, or anyone involved. I just find it amazing that anyone is trying to defend these people.
The Police report states that Robert Dillon had NO dog bits and NO bruises while Robert Bailey had lots of bruises from where he was hit with a gun by a mean drunk!
Your ignorant reply shows that you must be a Dillon fan.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#10 May 8, 2011
The Bailey’s had been under surveillance for years by the ATF. But what no one knew was the C.I.A. was drugging the Bailey’s and Dillon with a new chemical that is psychotropic in its makeup. The project had been scrapped and all traces of those who were guinea pigs for the agency had to be eliminated.

On that day Dillon was injected with triple the amount of this psychotropic drug. He was then brief by an agent to attack the Bailey’s. Agents were on the rooftops of the surrounding buildings. The fight ensured and then sharpshooters took aim, all were to be killed. But the position of the agents on the rooftops was compromised by Chinese Intel, they had to abort. Homeland security was then enacted and a spy satellite dispatched an unman drone to the area. The drone fired a shot striking Dillon, then used a hybrid magnet to remove Dillon’s weapon.
Wow

Columbus, OH

#11 May 8, 2011
RLB wrote:
<quoted text>
The Police report states that Robert Dillon had NO dog bits and NO bruises while Robert Bailey had lots of bruises from where he was hit with a gun by a mean drunk!
Your ignorant reply shows that you must be a Dillon fan.
I like his older more folky stuff, but he was kinda hit and miss in the 80's. I just wish he would enunciate a bit more, but I hear that's just part of his act.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#12 May 8, 2011
Wow wrote:
<quoted text>
I like his older more folky stuff, but he was kinda hit and miss in the 80's. I just wish he would enunciate a bit more, but I hear that's just part of his act.
I only liked two of his songs. It was always hard for me to get pass the fact that he was a heavy drug user and that he shot JFK.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#13 May 8, 2011
RLB wrote:
he attacked Mr. Bailey with a bike hitting him in the head with it then he started hitting Fallon Bailey with a bike chain after he jumped on top of Mr. Bailey that was still on the ground beating him with his gun.
What man especial the size of Dillon could accomplish such ninja like feats unless he was drugged by the C.I.A.? Plus any man in his right mind doesn't bring a gun to your house and uses it like a hammer, they shoot you. This is proof that Dillon had been drugged.
RLB

United States

#14 May 9, 2011
The Police report shows that Dillon had a 357 mag. and it was cut down to a stub nose,
it also shows that Dillon was shot up though his stomach the bullet was lodged in his chest showing that Bailey was on the ground fighting for he live.
No bullet hole in Dillion's back...

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#15 May 9, 2011
RLB wrote:
The Police report shows that Dillon had a 357 mag. and it was cut down to a stub nose,
it also shows that Dillon was shot up though his stomach the bullet was lodged in his chest showing that Bailey was on the ground fighting for he live.
No bullet hole in Dillion's back...
If that is true and Dillon had a gun than the Bailey's bond should be lowered and if I were on the jury I would say it's self defense because it must be considered that this happened in front of the Bailey's property. A man in front of your house with a modified weapon arguing with your daughter would certainly warrant a self defense claim.

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#16 May 9, 2011
RLB wrote:
The Police report shows that Dillon had a 357 mag. and it was cut down to a stub nose,
it also shows that Dillon was shot up though his stomach the bullet was lodged in his chest showing that Bailey was on the ground fighting for he live.
No bullet hole in Dillion's back...
Wait a minute; are you twisting the truth? I saw the evidence presented for trial and it shows they ran a check to see if Dillon had registered weapons in his lifetime. The question is did Dillon have that gun on him at that time or is it a weapon he once owned? Bottom line: Was that weapon found by the police as being on Dillon's person?
RLB

United States

#17 May 9, 2011
Kimsho wrote:
<quoted text>
Wait a minute; are you twisting the truth? I saw the evidence presented for trial and it shows they ran a check to see if Dillon had registered weapons in his lifetime. The question is did Dillon have that gun on him at that time or is it a weapon he once owned? Bottom line: Was that weapon found by the police as being on Dillon's person?
YES it was!
you can not register a modifed weapon!

Since: Mar 11

Location hidden

#18 May 10, 2011
RLB wrote:
<quoted text>
YES it was!
you can not register a modified weapon!
Yes it was found on Dillon's body? Yes it was what?

The modified weapon was once registered at some point. Just never mind about that. I think you're having trouble comprehending sentences. I believe you are Robert Bailey's father, RLB? Robert (L)? Bailey.
It's like I said if Dillon had a weapon than the Baileys will win this case.
RLB

United States

#19 May 10, 2011
Kimsho wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it was found on Dillon's body? Yes it was what?
The modified weapon was once registered at some point. Just never mind about that. I think you're having trouble comprehending sentences. I believe you are Robert Bailey's father, RLB? Robert (L)? Bailey.
It's like I said if Dillon had a weapon than the Baileys will win this case.
I am not his Father.
I was answering simple questions with simple answers.
and anyone can buy guns off the street.
and thanks to 10tv not giving all of the facts the Bailey's may not get a fair trail.
Gun nut

Columbus, OH

#20 May 26, 2011
RLB wrote:
<quoted text>
YES it was!
you can not register a modifed weapon!
First off, there is no gun registration. Second, you CAN register a modified weapon. Look up the facts before you play lawyer. Your case is moot.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
T Minus 4 3 2 1 ,,,, | Mueller Gone! 10 min 404 not found 108
Trump BALD HEAD 25 min Duke for Mayor 176
News Scandal forces appraisal of gay issues | The Co... (Oct '10) 55 min Former kool-aid d... 344
AEP silences #MeToo complaint 1 hr Frank 35
NO negotiate on immigration until Demorats end... 1 hr Duke for Mayor 3
Parents Shackle and Starve 13 Children, caught 1 hr Duke for Mayor 10
Obama Behind Bars? Release The Report! 1 hr Duke for Mayor 3
John Corby died Jan 20. 2018 1 hr Duke for Mayor 4

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages