Gun Control Under Obama

Posted in the Columbus Forum

Comments (Page 74)

Showing posts 1,461 - 1,480 of7,612
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Wait what

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1618
Jan 11, 2013
 
PS - no alcohol or drugs involved. They were, quite simply, accidents.
Wait what

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1619
Jan 11, 2013
 
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
By the same token ask the relatives of a family wiped out by a murder-suicide, or a child killed accidentally by the kid next door or someone who knows a family whose home was invaded by a bullet meant for someone out on the street.
How about the rape victim? Have you asked her?
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1620
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Wait what wrote:
PS - no alcohol or drugs involved. They were, quite simply, accidents.
How do you protest the licensure requirements?

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1621
Jan 11, 2013
 
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
you are forgetting that the shooter in CT was not old enough to own a handgun in the first place.
No, I am not. By that logic, because it is illegal for a fourteen year old to drive a vehicle, we should not criminalize drunk driving for adults, or require that they be licensed.

Do you see the disconnect?

woof
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1622
Jan 11, 2013
 
Pale Rider wrote:
Hugh Victor Thompson III said the government is going to take our guns.
I asked him to produce the evidence.
This candy ass Jew in on here only to argue. He may have a room full of ammo, and 15 AR-15 assault rifles and basement full of AK 47's.
Jew why do you need with one assault rifle. Do you plan on killing a bunch of people at a Democrat Rally, against Gun Violence. What do you need with them Jew? Without going off into left field, changing the subject like Sean Hannity. Why JEW, do you need with an assault rifle? Do you have the huge clip that will hold 100 rounds? I suspect you do and you do a lot of target practice. You need 100 rounds to hit a target 25 feet away, if you are lucky one time in 100, if at all. Your eyesight is so damn bad you can't see a target at 50 feet. Why don't you sell your guns old man, give the money to someone in need? You are too damn old, and too dangerous. Leave the guns to someone that isn't all but blind Jew, before you kill someone. Take some good advise Jew. It is time you take your guns to town, while you can get the high dollar.
why do some people buy Corvettes when the speed limit is 65MPH?

because they want to.

as long as they obey speed limits, you can own one.

break speeding laws enough, you lose license.

with firearms....one time breaking law is enough for a 25 year prison sentence.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1623
Jan 11, 2013
 
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
No, never driven there, Duke.
Drunk drivers don't go out with the sole intent of murdering people with their cars. I would venture most don't think they are too drunk to drive.
Mental cases DO have one intent and that is to murder or mutilate someone else. They'll get the gun no matter what regulations are put in place for regular people. And if they don't get a gun, they'll strap on a suicide bomb or go some other way to accomplish it.
Criminals will always have guns and will always modify them, you know that.
Those facts would suggest that restrictions in the realm of firearm ownership and access are even more appropriate than for driving vehicle.

woof
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1624
Jan 11, 2013
 
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I am not. By that logic, because it is illegal for a fourteen year old to drive a vehicle, we should not criminalize drunk driving for adults, or require that they be licensed.
Do you see the disconnect?
woof
on your end, yes I do.

we should severely punish crime period.

the laws on the books today enforced will curb gun violence in society immediately if we take politics away form enforcement.

25 year minimum sentence for any violent gun crime.

next case please.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1625
Jan 11, 2013
 
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Look up the demographics for each city. 82.7% vs 3.9%.
Then try Toronto Paco.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1626
Jan 11, 2013
 
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am able to purchase and use whatever quantities of whatever type of alcohol products that I want so long as I do not do that which is prohibited while under its influence. Similarly I should be able to purchase and use any type and as many of any type of weapons as I want so long as I do not operate them for an illegal purpose.
An excellent example Tony. My immediate thought was of Popcorn Sutton. Rather than serve another prison sentence for cheating the Federal government out of their cut of his moonshine proceeds, he sat in his car in his garage with the motor running til his time was up.

Even so, his conviction was perfectly legal, and I'm pretty certain the federal government's taxing powers made it so.

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1629
Jan 11, 2013
 
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
on your end, yes I do.
we should severely punish crime period.
the laws on the books today enforced will curb gun violence in society immediately if we take politics away form enforcement.
25 year minimum sentence for any violent gun crime.
next case please.
We are going to have to put one hell of a big tax on firearm paraphernalia to pay for that one.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1630
Jan 11, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
We are going to have to put one hell of a big tax on firearm paraphernalia to pay for that one.
there already is an excise tax of 10%.

a $200 tax stamp is required for all class 3 weaponry on top of that.

the definition of what is considered class 3 is the gun control the left seeks.

PS: if you were speaking jail, the part 2 of the equation is labor camps for criminals. No workie no eatie.

part 2 solves alot more potential criminal acts than part one by 20 to 1.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1631
Jan 11, 2013
 
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Then try Toronto Paco.
woof
You seem to have a problem with cold hard statistics, huh Dukie?
Toronto isn't "right across the river" as you pointed out with Windsor. It's also as unrepresentative of Canadian life as it gets, with Vancouver running a close second.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1632
Jan 11, 2013
 
Pale Rider wrote:
Hugh Victor Thompson III said the government is going to take our guns.
I asked him to produce the evidence.
This candy ass Jew in on here only to argue. He may have a room full of ammo, and 15 AR-15 assault rifles and basement full of AK 47's.
Jew why do you need with one assault rifle. Do you plan on killing a bunch of people at a Democrat Rally, against Gun Violence. What do you need with them Jew? Without going off into left field, changing the subject like Sean Hannity. Why JEW, do you need with an assault rifle? Do you have the huge clip that will hold 100 rounds? I suspect you do and you do a lot of target practice. You need 100 rounds to hit a target 25 feet away, if you are lucky one time in 100, if at all. Your eyesight is so damn bad you can't see a target at 50 feet. Why don't you sell your guns old man, give the money to someone in need? You are too damn old, and too dangerous. Leave the guns to someone that isn't all but blind Jew, before you kill someone. Take some good advise Jew. It is time you take your guns to town, while you can get the high dollar.
And there ladies and gentlemen, is full-blown Kentucky mental illness on display.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1633
Jan 11, 2013
 
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
there already is an excise tax of 10%.
a $200 tax stamp is required for all class 3 weaponry on top of that.
the definition of what is considered class 3 is the gun control the left seeks.
PS: if you were speaking jail, the part 2 of the equation is labor camps for criminals. No workie no eatie.
part 2 solves alot more potential criminal acts than part one by 20 to 1.
I don't think you realize how expensive it is to incarcerate someone. In Ohio, the Department of Rehabilitations is already doing everything it can to get people OUT of our prisons. We have to move our thinking beyond the Dark Ages.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1634
Jan 11, 2013
 
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>You seem to have a problem with cold hard statistics, huh Dukie?
Toronto isn't "right across the river" as you pointed out with Windsor. It's also as unrepresentative of Canadian life as it gets, with Vancouver running a close second.
Now Fred declares what is "Canadian" life and what isn't.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1635
Jan 11, 2013
 
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
By the same token ask the relatives of a family wiped out by a murder-suicide, or a child killed accidentally by the kid next door or someone who knows a family whose home was invaded by a bullet meant for someone out on the street.
A small fraction. You're still not getting that it's wrong to punish one person for the wrongdoing of another. You must have been raised thinking it's normal.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1636
Jan 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
But DUI laws are not prohibition. It is possible to regulate some aspects of a behavior without a complete ban on it, is it not?
They're not confiscating or limiting the purchase or consumption of alcohol of someone who is not driving drunk, are they?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1637
Jan 11, 2013
 
Karl Monday wrote:
<quoted text>
Governments have killed 230 million of there own people in the 20th Century, that's why I desire as much power as possible against them.
You are a dupe of the MSM, I don't watch FOX, it's partly owned by a Saudi prince.
The media lied Vietnam into a defeat, the nearly did the same with Iraq and could do the same in Afghanistan.
The USSR failed, capitalism won, and the EU mixed model is failing as we speak. Pull your head out of your ass.
And use paragraphs, otherwise you will be TL;DR'd
the US Mixed model is failing too as we speak and capitalism doesnt exist in the US but Socialism does and is alive and well.
VADoc

Augusta, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1638
Jan 11, 2013
 
Reader by your rantings and examples then the following would be fine by you;

I know there is welfare/Medicaid fraud. So we should just do away with Medicaid since some folks can't use it properly.

Also statistics show certain races commit more crimes than others so perhaps we should go ahead and just make it illegal for these folks to own guns? I mean if the statistics fit and it saves one persons' life it's worth it right?

Now I'm not serious about either of these, but that's the argument I hear about guns from the left. "Oh no an AR15 has been used in a few shootings! It's evil and should be against the law! Everyone should have their AR15 confiscated and destroyed!"

It's total nonsense. It's basically Jim Crow for the poorer folks who cannot afford a class 3 firearms license. Folks like Pelosi and Reid would still have their body guards carrying the same weapons. They most likely would still own them as well because they would be able to afford them.

You all want to close the background check gun show loop hole. I'm fine with that. You better make a straw man purchase a hefty sentence though because it will still occur.

You want a waiting period for me to buy an assault weapon? Fine with me.

That's about as flexible as I am with changing our laws.

The above 2 changes might make you feel like you've done something but you've done nothing.

Giving stiffer sentences for gun crimes (including hard labor) would do more to dissuade gun crimes.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1639
Jan 11, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Fred declares what is "Canadian" life and what isn't.
I guess he didn't understand the part about my point that big cities in Canada don't have the same problems with gun crimes that we do in America, regardless of the "demographics".

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,461 - 1,480 of7,612
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

50 Users are viewing the Columbus Forum right now

Search the Columbus Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
ted cruz: congress should impeach eric holder 13 min They cannot kill a Spook 6
Hillary’s Glasses? 14 min Seriouslady 14
Is Nevada rancher a freeloader? 24 min Oliver Canterberry 47
State University Wants to be "Less White" 1 hr Pope Che Reagan Christ I 24
Casual Marijuana Use Linked To Brain Abnormali... 1 hr Duke for Mayor 13
Pollen Vortex 2 hr Zoe Regen 3
Kansas shooting: Anti White Racism 3 hr Real Tea Party 5
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 15 hr magic man 1,915
•••
•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••