Gun Control Under Obama

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#926 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't need to twist your words to make you look like a hypocrite. Again, no one is forced to pay union dues. Unions contribute money to gain influence. The NRA contributes money to gain influence. You probably ought to look again at how much the NRA spends.
Unions want to gain influence to further their own agendas.

NRA uses it's influence to protect all citizen's 2nd amendment rights.

See the difference? Probably not.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#927 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No one has ever been forced to pay union dues. If you don't want the benefit of a union job, work somewhere else.
Knock, knock...the huge benefits are teetering out...
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#928 Jan 2, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
In my case I was working there before the union was voted in... So I was forced to quit.
Nobody gets forced to join a union, Tony.

You might have to pay in-kind contributions, but ya don't have to join.

woof

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#929 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you chose to quit.
I "chose" in the same way you "choose" to hand over your wallet to a mugger.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#930 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Your brain works on a very simple level.
He's still scratching his head trying to figure out how there were African slaves building infrastructure in New York City.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#931 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then. If that is your husband's experience, it must be a universal truth.
She's right, in regards to public work, what she's referring to as a "rate job".

Move the same workers to a privately funded project and their hourly rate drops 30-40%.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#932 Jan 2, 2013
Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
Unions want to gain influence to further their own agendas.
NRA uses it's influence to protect all citizen's 2nd amendment rights.
See the difference? Probably not.
That's a rather simplistic, and mistaken conclusion.

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#933 Jan 2, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I "chose" in the same way you "choose" to hand over your wallet to a mugger.
No, you didn't.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#934 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Your brain works on a very simple level.
But you have no rebuttal to my point. U R mad, rite?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#935 Jan 2, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>But you have no rebuttal to my point. U R mad, rite?
Try thinking about whether there is a difference between a voluntary choice of joining an organization and between following the law of the land.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#936 Jan 2, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
She's right, in regards to public work, what she's referring to as a "rate job".
Yep, designed to make it harder for non-union contractors to underbid union contractors, to fleece the taxpayers as much as possible.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#937 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Try thinking about whether there is a difference between a voluntary choice of joining an organization and between following the law of the land.
Try thinking about workplace discrimination vs religious freedom.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#938 Jan 2, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, designed to make it harder for non-union contractors to underbid union contractors, to fleece the taxpayers as much as possible.
That isn't the purpose Tony. Do some research on that issue.

woof
Pale Rider

AOL

#939 Jan 2, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>But you have no rebuttal to my point. U R mad, rite?
Rite? Have you got water on the brain Goat?

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#940 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you didn't.
Yes, I did. I was already the highest paid at the shop and lost $1.50 an hour as part of the "deal". That made the choice easier but I still ended up over $.50 down ($.50 was a lot bigger deal in the 70s than it is today) and it took me over a year to get back to the level I was. The mugger took me for $25 a week!

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#941 Jan 2, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
I wonder how many employers will drop health coverage altogether, figuring that it's cheaper to pay the fine.
Is is a flat fine or per employee fine, Tone? They can cut their employees back to under 50 or cut the hours per employee to under 28 per week to avoid any employer provided health insurance, but that will cost the individual a fortune and many of them will chose to pay the fine.

Quality of care is going to drop as doctors leave medicine or just refuse to accept medicare and Obamacare.

Or they can restructure the company into several smaller ones, each with only 49 employees and skirt it. What a friggin nightmare this is going to be. Stay well.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#942 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Well then. If that is your husband's experience, it must be a universal truth.
I don't know if it's 'universal', but that's the fact in this country. Unlike you, I don't make statements I'm not sure of.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#943 Jan 2, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Your brain works on a very simple level.
Went completely over his head.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#944 Jan 2, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
That isn't the purpose Tony. Do some research on that issue.
woof
I'm not sure why, not being in construction myself, but I know that's the way it works. I'll ask him tomorrow.

Throw a minority owned company in there and no one can underbid them on a federal job. And in most cases, they can't do the work right or on time and ignore all OSHA specs. But the inspector's turn a blind eye. Another 'bite' from entitlements.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#945 Jan 2, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I did. I was already the highest paid at the shop and lost $1.50 an hour as part of the "deal". That made the choice easier but I still ended up over $.50 down ($.50 was a lot bigger deal in the 70s than it is today) and it took me over a year to get back to the level I was. The mugger took me for $25 a week!
To your point of quitting rather than joining the union, yes, you made the right decision. A non-union worker can be treated very badly and dangerously in a union shop.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
AN ODE TO billary! 24 min Seriouslady 15
Man shot near Ferguson protest….. 2 hr El Chapo 217
Obama names Mt McKinley, Denali 2 hr Jose 5
They're Shooting News Reporters On Live TV 2 hr El Chapo 52
News Group raising funds to set up kosher pantry at ... 2 hr d pants 43
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 2 hr d pants 6,438
News Woman caught with 47 heroin balloons in her bod... (May '11) 12 hr Haha 30
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages