Gun Control Under Obama

[6was9]

Spookhere F trolls wrote:

<quoted text>
Chinese were more or less slaves on railroad crews as well.
From the history I have read on Coincoin she was cruel to her slaves. To her they were no different than horses or mules or in todays world tractors and.com bines.

Funny...I have never heard a Chinese person bytch about how they were held back by slavery......

Apparently they figured out how to rise above it without affirmative action.....go figure....

[-The-Artist-]

6was9 wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny...I have never heard a Chinese person bytch about how they were held back by slavery......
Apparently they figured out how to rise above it without affirmative action.....go figure....

I've never heard them complain about being held back by the legacy of Mao, and that's something!

[Pale rider]

Why do people have such a negative attitude toward Obama. He taught law, why would he try to undermine the Constitution? The truth is, he wouldn't.

There is a small group (1-3%) that are fanning the flames of hatred. What is wrong with removing guns that people don't need for hunting, target practice, or for protection.

We better be thankful we have a President that is trying to protect our rights.

Watch:

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Anonymous of Indy]

Pale rider wrote:

Why do people have such a negative attitude toward Obama. He taught law, why would he try to undermine the Constitution? The truth is, he wouldn't.
There is a small group (1-3%) that are fanning the flames of hatred. What is wrong with removing guns that people don't need for hunting, target practice, or for protection.
We better be thankful we have a President that is trying to protect our rights.
Watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Rachel Maddow is a lunatic too why dont Rachel Maddow and the others talk about how effective the gun ban in Chicago has been for years because they know it has proven to be failure, a big failure and not effective at all.

[TonyD2]

Pale rider wrote:

<quoted text>
I have friends all across the Middle East just like our President. You don't have that do you?

Nope. As foreign as I get are a couple of friends who live in Canada.

I can tell by your silly writing, you are looking for a confrontation,

Nope. Just trying to get the liars to tell the truth. Answer the question and I'll quit asking it.

Why do police need assault-type weapons?

sowing evil to anyone that will listen to your willingness to confront our brave law enforcement.

I never said that I was going to confront law enforcement. In fact, I said specifically that I would comply with any valid warrant they brought me. I just know, as do they, that they can't be everywhere at once, and I am simply displaying my willingness to "hold down the fort" until they can get here should there be aa situation where they would need to come.

[TonyD2]

-tip- wrote:

<quoted text>
Could you please tell those goatf***ers to save the best goats for Mohammed?
I hear he's getting pi$$ed about the encroachment on his harem.

And all this time I thought they were camelf***ers.

You know why they call camels "the ships of the desert", don't you?

[TonyD2]

-The-Artist- wrote:

<quoted text>
Or that the "Barbary Pirates" enslaved white people from Europe
Note the common thread...of Islam!
Arguably my biggest issue with "Roots", it presents Islam positively.

That, and the unconfirmed rumor that Alex Haley was adopted :)

[TonyD2]

Pale rider wrote:

Why do people have such a negative attitude toward Obama. He taught law, why would he try to undermine the Constitution? The truth is, he wouldn't.
There is a small group (1-3%) that are fanning the flames of hatred. What is wrong with removing guns that people don't need for hunting, target practice, or for protection.
We better be thankful we have a President that is trying to protect our rights.
Watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

One of these days you're going to tell someone what they need and they're going to give you what you need.

[Moises Levant]

Pale rider wrote:

Why do people have such a negative attitude toward Obama. He taught law, why would he try to undermine the Constitution? The truth is, he wouldn't.
There is a small group (1-3%) that are fanning the flames of hatred. What is wrong with removing guns that people don't need for hunting, target practice, or for protection.
We better be thankful we have a President that is trying to protect our rights.
Watch:
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

A shyster is a just an educated BS artist.

The decision of what arms can be carried and who can carry them is not a delegated federal power.

Surely a shyster who fervently believes that abortion and sodomy are federally protected civil rights can also understand the second amendment and the bill of rights, right?

Apparently not, especially when the goal is national tyranny.

[Pale rider]

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
One of these days you're going to tell someone what they need and they're going to give you what you need.

What you don't understand is this. I love to boss people. I enjoy telling them what to do, and how to do it. That is what bossy people do. Now support what our President is trying to do for the families of Sandy Hook.

Why do you keep asking the question, why do the Police need with assault guns?

In your own words what do you think I need?

[Pale Rider]

Moises Levant wrote:

<quoted text>
A shyster is a just an educated BS artist.
The decision of what arms can be carried and who can carry them is not a delegated federal power.
Surely a shyster who fervently believes that abortion and sodomy are federally protected civil rights can also understand the second amendment and the bill of rights, right?
Apparently not, especially when the goal is national tyranny.

What are you talking about?

[TonyD2]

Pale rider wrote:

<quoted text>
What you don't understand is this. I love to boss people. I enjoy telling them what to do, and how to do it. That is what bossy people do.

In other words, you're a control freak and a wannabe bully.

Now support what our President is trying to do for the families of Sandy Hook.

No, because what he is trying to do will not reduce the chance of it happening again by a single percent.

Why do you keep asking the question, why do the Police need with assault guns?

Because the answer is the same as it is for why citizens may need them.

In your own words what do you think I need?

What I think you need is irrelevant. The one who gives it to you will determine it.

[TonyD2]

Pale Rider wrote:

<quoted text>
What are you talking about?

He's just pointing out more leftist hypocrisy.

[Pale Rider]

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
In other words, you're a control freak and a wannabe bully.
<quoted text>
No, because what he is trying to do will not reduce the chance of it happening again by a single percent.
<quoted text>
Because the answer is the same as it is for why citizens may need them.
<quoted text>
What I think you need is irrelevant. The one who gives it to you will determine it.

I was a bully in high school, I just can't shake it.
No, because what he is trying to do will not reduce the chance of it happening again by a single percent.
No one would believe you, if you were standing on a stack of Bibles. Your thoughts don't mean one damn thing.
One thing about it, you are all talk.

[TonyD2]

Pale Rider wrote:

<quoted text>
I was a bully in high school, I just can't shake it.
No, because what he is trying to do will not reduce the chance of it happening again by a single percent.
No one would believe you, if you were standing on a stack of Bibles. Your thoughts don't mean one damn thing.

They won't have to believe me. They'll see it for themselves when the next one happens.

[TonyD2]

Pale Rider wrote:

<quoted text>
I was a bully in high school, I just can't shake it.
No, because what he is trying to do will not reduce the chance of it happening again by a single percent.
No one would believe you, if you were standing on a stack of Bibles. Your thoughts don't mean one damn thing.
One thing about it, you are all talk.

I almost forgot. Why do police need assault-type weapons?

[Adif understanding]

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Rachel Maddow is a lunatic too why dont Rachel Maddow and the others talk about how effective the gun ban in Chicago has been for years because they know it has proven to be failure, a big failure and not effective at all.

Gun control in Chicago is working exactly as planned. It never was about reducing gun violence, just gun violence against certain people. When the public is unable to defend itself, it demands more government to do it which in turn allows more crap and controls to be pushed through.

[Anonymous of Indy]

Adif understanding wrote:

<quoted text>Gun control in Chicago is working exactly as planned. It never was about reducing gun violence, just gun violence against certain people. When the public is unable to defend itself, it demands more government to do it which in turn allows more crap and controls to be pushed through.

true and that makes sense which is a good valid point to make & point out.

[Hugh Victor Thompson III]

Pale Rider wrote:

<quoted text>
I was a bully in high school, I just can't shake it.
No, because what he is trying to do will not reduce the chance of it happening again by a single percent.
No one would believe you, if you were standing on a stack of Bibles. Your thoughts don't mean one damn thing.
One thing about it, you are all talk.

A bully, huh? I think you got your ass kicked so many times that you still can't sit down. And it's obvious you asked for and deserved them dearly. In fact, you're looking more and more like a potential mass murderer yourself. Your bizarre posts bear a striking resemblance to Chris Dorner's "manifesto."
We're watching you, hilljack.

[-The-Artist-]

Adif understanding wrote:

<quoted text>Gun control in Chicago is working exactly as planned. It never was about reducing gun violence, just gun violence against certain people. When the public is unable to defend itself, it demands more government to do it which in turn allows more crap and controls to be pushed through.

Gun control in Chicago, was intended to INCREASE violence. Not decrease it.

It's known that many Chicago pols are tied with gangs, as has been for most of Chicago history, even when Chicago was white.

The idea was that if you increased the violence, people would get the state and federal governments to ban guns as well, which would leave only the criminals armed.

People would then demand a police state and wealth transfer programs to the underclass to prevent the crime.