Which is more logical, agnostic atheism or gnostic atheism?
Posted in the Columbus Forum
#1 May 1, 2013
Agnostic atheism sucks. They say they don't believe in God but they can't prove/disprove if one exists or not. They also say that they are totally gnostic about the christian god and any other man made gods but are agnostic about the god concept, as there could be something we haven't found out yet.
Gnostic atheism is awesome. They know for a fact nothing supernatural exists, period. It doesn't have to proven because it is obvious.
Which is more logical?
#2 May 1, 2013
I don't care. Both sound like a waste of time.
#3 May 1, 2013
Correction-It doesn't have to *be* further proven because it is obvious. There is more than enough proof to disprove the supernatural.
“animis opibusque parati”
Since: Oct 12
#4 May 1, 2013
Everyone knows a self-described agnostic is just an atheist without the balls to admit it.
Add your comments below
|Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13)||44 min||Pope Che Reagan C...||4,031|
|The Poll: Is Obama doing a good job?||45 min||Reality Speaks||8|
|Kasick------ we we we we LOL||51 min||They cannot kill ...||7|
|Woman Battling Homelessness Has Purse Snatched ...||55 min||They cannot kill ...||2|
|Any kinky ladies?||59 min||They cannot kill ...||9|
|Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13)||2 hr||Hinky||2,480|
|President Ebola||5 hr||d pantz||712|
Find what you want!
Search Columbus Forum Now