Comments
401 - 420 of 448 Comments Last updated Feb 3, 2013

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#417 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, listening to a podcast.
No alien invaders so far.
But clearly some anti-government hysteria for fun and profit.
We call that an opposing viewpoint. It's less "hysteria" than the way the MSM covers mass shootings.
You won't hear any Art Bell-type stories on Red Eye. Red Eye's lighter hours often involve a bit of TV and music trivia.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#418 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, George, you keep claiming that the law-abiding are all set to break the law as soon as they don't like it.
And regulation is not punishment.
Keeping our property is not breaking the law. Any such "law" would be unconstitutional. Look at what is happening in New York. Very few will register their firearms.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

#419 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, George, you keep claiming that the law-abiding are all set to break the law as soon as they don't like it.
And regulation is not punishment.
Limiting us to 7 rounds, one more than they had in 1836, is punishment

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

#420 Jan 28, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Not a chance at 45 watts nighttime power. Try one of the 50,000 watt stations like WLS 890, Chicago; WJR 760, Detroit or WABC 770, New York. Detroit should be no problem.
Ok

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

#421 Jan 28, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Keeping our property is not breaking the law. Any such "law" would be unconstitutional. Look at what is happening in New York. Very few will register their firearms.
A few more pics of Roberts at the bathhouse, and it will be constitutional.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#422 Jan 28, 2013
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Keeping our property is not breaking the law. Any such "law" would be unconstitutional. Look at what is happening in New York. Very few will register their firearms.
When you talk about massive resistance you are alluding to something.

You have also suggested making (illegal) weapons with 3D printers and by other means.

And, if the law requires registration, then refusing to register would be breaking the law. But, all you law-abiding gun-owners will be abiding the law, right?

As far as your predictions about New York--well your track record on predictions isn't exactly stellar. How about we wait and see how it goes, eh?

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#423 Jan 28, 2013
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Limiting us to 7 rounds, one more than they had in 1836, is punishment
Now you are whining.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#424 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Not so much, MT:
"Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, introduced a bill that would ban the sale, transfer, manufacture and importation of 100 specialty firearms and certain semiautomatic weapons. The bill would also outlaw the sale, importation and manufacture of ammunition magazines that accept more than 10 rounds.
"Based on the legislation, called "The Assault Weapons Ban of 2013," Americans would be able to keep certain weapons if they were already in their possession when the bill was enacted, and exemptions would be made for specific hunting and sporting weapons, as well as antique or disabled weapons."
http://www.ibtimes.com/dianne-feinstein-gun-b...
Doesn't sound like confiscation to me.
There's a difference between what they want and what they think has a snowball's chance in Hell of passing.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#425 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
There are no 100% cures.
If you know of any, please feel free to offer them up.
There was a decline in the number of killings from assault weapons during the 10 year ban--despite numerous weaknesses in that legislation.
And the declines continue since its expiration!

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

#426 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are whining.
That's a statement of fact, like it or not, Cuomo's law is not a "compromise" between a Japanese-style total ban and the current situation, it is extreme and will be treated as such.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

#427 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
When you talk about massive resistance you are alluding to something.
You have also suggested making (illegal) weapons with 3D printers and by other means.
And, if the law requires registration, then refusing to register would be breaking the law. But, all you law-abiding gun-owners will be abiding the law, right?
As far as your predictions about New York--well your track record on predictions isn't exactly stellar. How about we wait and see how it goes, eh?
http://www.chuckhawks.com/just_say_no.htm

http://www.chuckhawks.com/canadian_gun_contro...

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#428 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
When you talk about massive resistance you are alluding to something.
You have also suggested making (illegal) weapons with 3D printers and by other means.
And, if the law requires registration, then refusing to register would be breaking the law. But, all you law-abiding gun-owners will be abiding the law, right?
As far as your predictions about New York--well your track record on predictions isn't exactly stellar. How about we wait and see how it goes, eh?
How many times do you have to be told: an unconstitutional law is not valid.
There will be no way to tally the resistance in New York by numbers. A gun owner may register two of his ten firearms to deter further investigation. You'll never know who has what. Thank God.

Since: Jan 13

Returning with a vengeance

#429 Jan 28, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a difference between what they want and what they think has a snowball's chance in Hell of passing.
They want what Howard got in Oz.

What will pass?

Who knows at this point at the federal level.

What surprises me is that CA has not moved any further to pass anything. Fineswine apparently doesn't want any distractions.

All the action has come from the Northeast.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#430 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you are whining.
Grow up and learn what freedom is and how it's being taken away.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#431 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, George, you keep claiming that the law-abiding are all set to break the law as soon as they don't like it.
And regulation is not punishment.
If your mom takes your dolls away or won't let you buy new ones because your sister flushed hers down the toilet, that's punishment... unjust punishment.
My Turn

Arlington Heights, IL

#432 Jan 28, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
They'd have no clue how to drive my 59 Studebaker. Never make it out of the driveway.
woof
Yeah, I'd like to see some stupid hood rat work a three on the tree trans.

Yaz, s--- man, what doe f---
Adif understanding

Chicago, IL

#433 Jan 28, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet you listen to late-night AM talk radio, don't you?
No i do not. Why, are they saying the same things? I guess that means maybe you should rethink your position a bit.
OZ the Wizard of truth

Columbus, OH

#434 Jan 29, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Voting against a more competent candidate because of his position on only one issue is logical?
I agree with you 100%
Obama was elected and re-elected because he is black.
Mitt Romney has 20 times the credentials to successfully run and operate business or government.
OZ the Wizard of truth

Columbus, OH

#435 Jan 29, 2013
Citizens of the USA who own guns, will give the finger to liberals demanding rid gun legislation.

Guns are not the problem......people are

The laws currently on the books just require enforcing.

That would require work; and work is something liberals in office won't do.

So the gun owning citizens must protect our 2nd amendment and society, because the liberals won't.

Fact check with 50 year track record the liberals solutions did not provide.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#436 Jan 29, 2013
My Turn wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah, I'd like to see some stupid hood rat work a three on the tree trans.
Yaz, s--- man, what doe f---
And two more gears operated with the accelerator.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why do racists hate Obama so much ? 36 min Neutral Party 23
welfare nation 51 min They cannot kill ... 18
Are ISIS and Obama in Cahoots? 1 hr Colbert 23
Almighty God OR rabid allah??? 1 hr Colbert 25
RIP Joan Rivers 5 hr E-Bob 21
WHEN did Obama tell the truth? 7 hr Allison 2
Was Bergdahl Planned ALL ALONG?? 7 hr Allison 18
Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 7 hr Anonymous of Indy 30,543
Where are all the original legacy posters? 11 hr They cannot kill ... 116
•••
•••
Columbus Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••