Clintonville turn-lane verdict may be at hand
Afternoon Update, sent weekday afternoons, keeps you up to date with breaking news and updates from later in the day.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Columbus Dispatch.
Since: Sep 10
#1 Jun 16, 2013
Who cares? Area full of ignorant democrats!
#2 Jun 16, 2013
You have that right. Driving through there I keep on hand on my wallet.
#3 Jun 17, 2013
It's a shame. I lived on ENB (1956) before it became a main connector. It was a nice quiet street. Oakland Park was the 'busy' street where everyone would cross over the railroad tracks to the area what is now east of the freeway. Choosing ENB as an exit for I-71 and then locating Riverside Hospital where it is doomed ENB to become a busy street. When 315 opened in the 1970s the doom was sealed.
I don't think the left turn lane will speed traffic. I think it will slow it down during rush hours because the left turn lane will back up cars wanting to go straight through the High Street intersection. In the future the City will want to extend the left turn lane further back than they are originally going to build it. A better solution for traffic flow would be to divert all traffic coming off I-71 at ENB that wants to turn left on High Street to Oakland Park, one block north, and then have them turn left on High Street and let the through traffic and right turn traffic remain on ENB. It would be a slight inconvenience to those wanting to turn left but no more than they have been dealing with to date. Oakland Park is as wide of a street as ENB. I know nobody cares about a few homeowners on ENB but as a former ENB resident near High Street this will be a shame to build this left turn lane. It's a shame that those pushing this left turn lane don't have to tolerate the daily negative impact on their quality of life as the residents of ENB will have to tolerate.
This left turn lane will compound problems during rush hours. Too bad for Broadway.
This also breaks a promise made by the City of Columbus many years ago.
#4 Jun 18, 2013
#5 Jun 18, 2013
What a comment. To speak up to maintain one's quality of life and property value is selfish? Perhaps the Oakland Park residents not wanting to share the traffic burden would be considered selfish. Not that I would expect them to willingly accept more traffic.
My word for you is - ignorant.
#6 Jun 18, 2013
That is thinking, something government slugs don't do
Add your comments below
|Jerry Lewis 91 years||4 hr||404 not found||2|
|Tecumseh the prophet||6 hr||Mud, James Mud||2|
|August 21 - When it All Hits the Fan||6 hr||Pope Che Reagan C...||51|
|Trump Will Win Again in 2020||10 hr||ImPeach||88|
|Trump, Afghanistan, and Private Mercenary Militia||10 hr||Free Speech||1|
|NPR: Large Majority Support Keeping Confederate...||12 hr||d pants||32|
|de Facto Trump KKK Grand Imperial Wizard||16 hr||Help me understand||2|
Find what you want!
Search Columbus Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC