The George Zimmerman Case!
They cannot kill a Spook

United States

#1639 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
If such an organized team manages to take out a few neighborhood kids by mistake, that's OK by you, eh?
If the kids are casing homes sure exterminate them.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1640 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
The lack of DNA on the weapon is rather inconsequential. But, Z's claim is that Trayvon used both hands to smother him--covering both his mouth and (bleeding) nose. Unrealistic to suppose no transfer of blood/DNA to his hands with all those ready bodily fluids there.
The evidence which you consider circumstantial contradicts Z's story. It is much easier to rule out a story as impossible than it is to support one. Z. is lying and the evidence shows it.
What we are left with then is the gun, the body and the shell casing. And Zimmerman's admission that he shot him.
Re-read what the DNA experts said, above:

"They also agreed that Trayvon wouldn’t necessarily get DNA under his fingernails, even if he had punched Zimmerman."

That is what intelligent people recognize as "reasonable doubt."

No solid conclusion may be drawn from any of the DNA evidence.
None.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1641 Jun 14, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Northwest of Hilliard is Plain City. Southeast of Dublin is Upper Arlington and the NW side of Columbus, you lying grease bag.
You live in one of those "win-win" areas Georgie?

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1642 Jun 14, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>You've obviously never been married if you're asking that question. She lied about a PayPal balance...not the right thing to do, but she was protecting her husband. And let's not forget, since 1998, perjury hasn't been considered the crime it once was. Chalk that up to another "contribution" made by Bill Clinton to posterity.
BTW--that particular lie wasn't actually protecting her husband, it was protecting the money. And then there was that extra passport, and the out-of-state location.

All the elements of a plan to flee the country.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1643 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
BTW--that particular lie wasn't actually protecting her husband, it was protecting the money. And then there was that extra passport, and the out-of-state location.
All the elements of a plan to flee the country.
With a Black Panther bounty on his head, who can blame him?

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1644 Jun 14, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Just saying how the jury will hear/have heard about the self-defense claim, without Zimmerman necessarily having to take the stand to claim it himself.
The jury is being abundantly cautioned during the selection process, and no doubt will be again during the judge's instructions, that any information beyond what was presented in court is not to be considered.

The defense would be foolish to rely upon outside information. They will have to present a case and follow the rules of evidence.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1645 Jun 14, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>

Did you listen to the tape? You can clearly hear him stop running when the dispatcher said "we don't need you to do that" and he said "OK" there is absolutely no evidence that he was "going after" Martin after that time.
Well, there is the location of his flashlight--far afield from where he says he went, and well out of the path of a simple return to his truck.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1646 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
The jury is being abundantly cautioned during the selection process, and no doubt will be again during the judge's instructions, that any information beyond what was presented in court is not to be considered.
The defense would be foolish to rely upon outside information. They will have to present a case and follow the rules of evidence.
As all juries are.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1647 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, there is the location of his flashlight--far afield from where he says he went, and well out of the path of a simple return to his truck.
OK, the DNA evidence fails to prove the state's case.

Now you think a flashlight's location will be the clincher that proves Zimmerman did not act in self-defense?

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1648 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
The defense would be foolish to rely upon outside information. They will have to present a case and follow the rules of evidence.
Still confused?
It is the state which has to present a case proving its charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1649 Jun 14, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Re-read what the DNA experts said, above:
"They also agreed that Trayvon wouldn’t necessarily get DNA under his fingernails, even if he had punched Zimmerman."
That is what intelligent people recognize as "reasonable doubt."
No solid conclusion may be drawn from any of the DNA evidence.
None.
Punching is quite different from the two-handed smothering that Z. describes.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1650 Jun 14, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
As all juries are.
And this is why Tony's claim that the jury will make their decision based on this is a weak argument.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1651 Jun 14, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, the DNA evidence fails to prove the state's case.
Now you think a flashlight's location will be the clincher that proves Zimmerman did not act in self-defense?
It is one piece of evidence, among many, that are refute Zimmerman's self-defense narrative.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1652 Jun 14, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
With a Black Panther bounty on his head, who can blame him?
Surely you jest.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1653 Jun 14, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Still confused?
It is the state which has to present a case proving its charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
There is no doubt, reasonable or otherwise, that George Zimmerman shot and killed Trayvon Martin.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1654 Jun 14, 2013
Wait what wrote:
<quoted text>
The experts are going to cancel each other out, I'm fairly certain of it. And no eyewitnesses.
There are some eye-witnesses.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1655 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Punching is quite different from the two-handed smothering that Z. describes.
Those experts [one of whom regularly testifies for prosecutors] reviewed the DNA evidence and concluded that it carried no weight with respect to the charges.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

#1656 Jun 14, 2013
Oolongti wrote:
<quoted text>

How can someone declare self defense when the bullet went in the back and exited the front...( this was one story I read...so I don't know if this is true..)
Bullet entered the front straight on and did not exit.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1657 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Surely you jest.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/03/2...

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#1658 Jun 14, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
It is one piece of evidence, among many, that are refute Zimmerman's self-defense narrative.
Calling into question a narrative is not the same as proving the charges.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Planned parenthood videos appall even pro choic... 10 min Seriouslady 202
More climate "science" 17 min Reality Speaks 119
Those Pesky Christians Hate the Constitution 49 min Duke for Mayor 1
Trump surges to big lead in GOP 1 hr Reality Speaks 116
I didn't see this coming 4 hr Reality Speaks 70
white focus 9 hr Duke for Mayor 5
Dead LA man who had underwater car identified; ... 16 hr Doc 6
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages