"She said the science supporting the experts’ analyses “is not as widely accepted at this time” as the more established methods relied on by defense witnesses who said it was impossible to conclude whose voice it was."<quoted text>
I expect her to allow them. Frye stresses the exclusion of testimony based on methodology that is untested and unrecognized by peers in the field.
There wasnt much in the testimony to address that and even the newer software simply mechanizes older methods.
The disagreements had to do with the size of the sample used and whether the quality of the recording was adequate as well as whether speech can be compared to screams.
I really dont know why the defense has invested so much time in keeping the experts out. Without them the jury can listen and decide. With the the defense can hope to confuse them or bore them to tears.