American Thinker weighs in on Zimmerman

Posted in the Columbus Forum

Comments (Page 9)

Showing posts 161 - 180 of187
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Wait what

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#163
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

4

2

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
No, ma'am.
Sorry, but you are simply not going to get away with that one.
When you threw in the words United Methodist Children's Home--completely decontextualized, I took it to be a reference to a lengthy discussion I had with someone who shares a certain tenacity and posting style with you.
I took your reference to be a reminder of that discussion--and thought you had provided me with some insight into your particular fascination with disagreeing with me.
When you pointed out that you were not that person and provided their name, I apoligised and dropped the matter. My mistake.
I don't know what more could reasonably be expected, however apparently you still seem to desire something more. What is it that you would like?
I demanded the apology, Reader, and you refused it to give it at first.

I would like you to stop lying, stop twisting, and stop thinking that certain people are out to get you when you lose control of a conversation, for starters.

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Wait what wrote:
<quoted text>
I copied and pasted the whole conversation in another thread so yes, I am going to get away with that one.
You mentioned you worked at a facility supported by the Methodist church. I have Methodist clergy in my family (not disclosed at the time) and I responded by asking you if it was the youth home in Worthington. Based on my asking you (similar to someone saying I had dealings with a defense contractor in Columbus, oh, is that DSCC?) you told readers that I was someone who had been instrumental in leading the fight in Worthington to get the home shut down. It was lengthier than that. Worse, other people who normally don't jump into other people's fights jumped in to say you were wrong - that's how blatant it was.
As I said in another thread, today is one of those days where I feel sorry for you.
Had you actually offer that kind of explanation, and then asked the question, perhaps I would have better understood.

However you posted something like "United Methodist Children's Home?" which I took to be a reference to that discussion--particularly since I have never worked there.

And having apoligized now multiple times now for my misunderstanding, I fail to understand why you want to continue the conversation--especially with the repeated falsehood that I invented things about you.
Wait what

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#165
Mar 16, 2013
 
SL, Che is right. Even for those instructions where "beyond a shadow of a doubt" is used, lawyers have asked for clarification and the judge has had to instruct that reasonable doubt should be considered.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Wait what wrote:
<quoted text>
I demanded the apology, Reader, and you refused it to give it at first.
I would like you to stop lying, stop twisting, and stop thinking that certain people are out to get you when you lose control of a conversation, for starters.
And WW, while you're wishing....wish for us to hit the lottery, without buying a ticket, and, what the whole country would like, a mandatory new vote taken for the 2012 presidential election with impartial polls and poll workers!

“Don't trust the internet!”

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#167
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
And WW, while you're wishing....wish for us to hit the lottery, without buying a ticket, and, what the whole country would like, a mandatory new vote taken for the 2012 presidential election with impartial polls and poll workers!
That's what the whole country wants?

Wow. Interesting concept of straightforward honesty.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Wait what wrote:
SL, Che is right. Even for those instructions where "beyond a shadow of a doubt" is used, lawyers have asked for clarification and the judge has had to instruct that reasonable doubt should be considered.
WW, In MD, they still adhere to old verbage in many courtrooms. I've heard it spoken, and claified in jury instruction. That is true.

Che insists the words were never spoken in any US court. You know how Che and Twister mince and spin. And really, who cares? What's the big deal?

Now Tran provided the below link, which states otherwise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_the_shado...

I'm taking a nap!:-)

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#169
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Wait what wrote:
SL, Che is right. Even for those instructions where "beyond a shadow of a doubt" is used, lawyers have asked for clarification and the judge has had to instruct that reasonable doubt should be considered.
Yeah, I'm not sure bringing more people in to support the facts is really going to help. Sometimes you just need to make peace with the idea that some people aren't willing to learn.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what the whole country wants?
Wow. Interesting concept of straightforward honesty.
You should try it.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#171
Mar 16, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
WW, In MD, they still adhere to old verbage in many courtrooms. I've heard it spoken, and claified in jury instruction. That is true.
Che insists the words were never spoken in any US court. You know how Che and Twister mince and spin. And really, who cares? What's the big deal?
Now Tran provided the below link, which states otherwise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_the_shado...
I'm taking a nap!:-)
People care because someone who is wrong and denies the truth against all proof can't really be trusted to present other points with factual accuracy.

Someone who calls people stupid for offering them the truth to counter their ignorance may lack the level of civility needed to take part in an open, honest, adult exchange.

Also, because the truth is important.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#172
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
People care because someone who is wrong and denies the truth against all proof can't really be trusted to present other points with factual accuracy.
Someone who calls people stupid for offering them the truth to counter their ignorance may lack the level of civility needed to take part in an open, honest, adult exchange.
Also, because the truth is important.
the truth is important, so when are you going to start being truthful?

bored on your honeymoon already to be posting on a website?

you must have married a very interesting individual to keep your attention for 5 minutes.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>the truth is important, so when are you going to start being truthful?
bored on your honeymoon already to be posting on a website?
you must have married a very interesting individual to keep your attention for 5 minutes.
I'm getting married next week.

Though, even after next week I don't really think he'll take up all my time. That's just not how marriage works.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm getting married next week.
Though, even after next week I don't really think he'll take up all my time. That's just not how marriage works.


you being an expert an all on another subject you have no experience in.

it would not take me a week to be bored with you.....about 1 minute, and it passed long ago.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#175
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
you being an expert an all on another subject you have no experience in.
it would not take me a week to be bored with you.....about 1 minute, and it passed long ago.
I'm not sure that I would ever be called upon to entertain someone like yourself. I can't really think of a context where this would be needed.

Though, should I find myself married to an aging fantasist in the future, I will make a point to remember my much reduced ability to charm. Though keeping the one I have noe for some time to come really seems to be in everyone's best interests.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

1

tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not sure that I would ever be called upon to entertain someone like yourself. I can't really think of a context where this would be needed.
Though, should I find myself married to an aging fantasist in the future, I will make a point to remember my much reduced ability to charm. Though keeping the one I have noe for some time to come really seems to be in everyone's best interests.
for once I agree with you, there never would be a time where you were called to entertain me. I also can't think of a single reason I would want to meet you.

Keeping the one you have noe?

Your 20 years of education failed you. If you require remedial spelling courses, I can post links for you.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#177
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, I'm not sure bringing more people in to support the facts is really going to help. Sometimes you just need to make peace with the idea that some people aren't willing to learn.
are you speaking of the entire Democratic Party & RINO's in office currently?

making peace would be to terminate the lot of them, and send them home to the unemployment line, and end all benefits they were to earn as a employee of the Government.

for years.....years....we have been waiting on a budget from the Senate the house can vote upon.

just vote....the Senate refuses to follow constitutional rule of law, and prefers to blame someone else for them not doing their job. 4 years later and the children are still playing.

Maybe for the slow learners in the Senate, a group of citizens enters the Senate chamber with chains and locks the criminals up, and drags them to jail. They can serve the remaining days of their term caged where we can keep our eyes on them.

is your definition of a slow learner
A.) high school drop out, or teenage pregnancy?
B.) anyone who disagrees with you?
C.) an employed person?
D.) someone married to the opposite sex?
E.) a Christian?
F.) someone who lets their children live?
G.) white people?
H.) CEO of a fortune 500 company?
Che Reagan Christ

Buffalo, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#178
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
I will continue to look at this thread because I like seeing all the green checkmarks, yellow lightbulbs and stars above my posts.
That's a little needy.
Che Reagan Christ

Buffalo, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#179
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Seriouslady wrote:
<quoted text>
WW, In MD, they still adhere to old verbage in many courtrooms. I've heard it spoken, and claified in jury instruction. That is true.
Che insists the words were never spoken in any US court. You know how Che and Twister mince and spin. And really, who cares? What's the big deal?
Now Tran provided the below link, which states otherwise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_the_shado...
I'm taking a nap!:-)
You call someone else Twister? Find a post where I said those words were "never spoken in any US court." Whacko. There are many things said in courts that aren't accurate. What is accurate is my statement that the highest degree in the law is beyond a reasonable doubt.

Thank you for providing some vague anecdotal evidence of what you heard though. That's always amusing when you do that. What were you on trial for?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#180
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

2

Beyond a shadow of a doubt, this thread is hilarious!

woof

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#181
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
People care because someone who is wrong and denies the truth against all proof can't really be trusted to present other points with factual accuracy.
Someone who calls people stupid for offering them the truth to counter their ignorance may lack the level of civility needed to take part in an open, honest, adult exchange.
Also, because the truth is important.
So is self experience. You, lecturing on the truth is ridiculous.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#182
Mar 17, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You call someone else Twister? Find a post where I said those words were "never spoken in any US court." Whacko. There are many things said in courts that aren't accurate. What is accurate is my statement that the highest degree in the law is beyond a reasonable doubt.
Thank you for providing some vague anecdotal evidence of what you heard though. That's always amusing when you do that. What were you on trial for?
Nothing. I was a witness for the state.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 161 - 180 of187
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

69 Users are viewing the Columbus Forum right now

Search the Columbus Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 12 min Pale Rider 2,749
Michelle Obama f/k/a Michael LaVaughn Robinson 12 min say what 7
muslim brotherhood authorizes 'anal jihad' 22 min say what 59
Is Barak Obama responsible for the current bord... 1 hr Pope Che Reagan Christ I 86
OH Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010? (Oct '10) 1 hr Pope Che Reagan Christ I 28,652
Do we need to impeach Obama to save America? 2 hr tranpsosition 33
Music 3 hr Pale Rider 9
•••
•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••