Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#949 Sep 20, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You think it's OK to mock God and his followers as you do, correct?
In fact, you have denied that you are a Christian-basher...and yet the proof is overwhelming.
Pointing out that nobody has ever proven God's existence is not "mocking God and his followers", Tip.

You're way off base. You really need not be so defensive about it. If my pointing out a fact like that somehow bothers you, then you really should think about that a little.

woof

“PLANET EARTH”

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#950 Sep 20, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I find some of it over the top, but I think what you are missing/ignoring is that it is done for a specific purpose that you aren't comprehending.
woof
Wrong!!!! Dukey boy, don't insult me.
I know why, you have a difference in opinion regarding politics. And everything else others post here.
If you and a few others wouldn't always be in ATTACK MODE, maybe people won't have to defend the nasty behavior displayed by you and your "friends"
It's all in the approach! Didn't you mother teach you anything? You get more bees with honey.....
Another little point. If you think Che is OVER THE TOP, THEN WHY DO YOU SIDE WITH HER?
I thought you were a man of integrity, and walked to the beat of your own drum. Guess not. We can only hope.

Pass the Canoli

“PLANET EARTH”

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#951 Sep 20, 2013
They cannot kill a Spook wrote:
<quoted text>
Che is the kind of critter than if it were raped one would fill sorry for the rapist
Ok, just fell off the couch laughing!
Love your humor!!!!

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#952 Sep 20, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Pointing out that nobody has ever proven God's existence is not "mocking God and his followers", Tip.
You're way off base. You really need not be so defensive about it. If my pointing out a fact like that somehow bothers you, then you really should think about that a little.
woof
Deflection FAIL.

My greatest curiosity is the general habit of skeptics/atheists to reduce each and every discussion to a debate over the existence of God. If these individuals firmly believe that God does not exist and no proof will ever demonstrate otherwise, then why should they waste their time discussing Him?

“PLANET EARTH”

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#953 Sep 20, 2013
Next person to have an encounter with Che, will be her bragging on how we are all posting about HE R !
She will be gloating, but too bad all this massive attention on her is N E G A T I V E
B a r f

Since: Jun 13

Hilliard, OH

#954 Sep 20, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Deflection FAIL.
My greatest curiosity is the general habit of skeptics/atheists to reduce each and every discussion to a debate over the existence of God. If these individuals firmly believe that God does not exist and no proof will ever demonstrate otherwise, then why should they waste their time discussing Him?
Theophobia. Plain, simple and obvious.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#955 Sep 20, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Deflection FAIL.
My greatest curiosity is the general habit of skeptics/atheists to reduce each and every discussion to a debate over the existence of God. If these individuals firmly believe that God does not exist and no proof will ever demonstrate otherwise, then why should they waste their time discussing Him?
Maybe it has nothing to do whatsoever with whether they believe in God's existence.

Maybe its because because religious zealots have tried to control the behaviors of others based upon their own religious zealotry for centuries, and they vehemently oppose such nonsense.

Has that thought ever crossed your mind?

woof
They cannot kill a Spook

United States

#956 Sep 20, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Deflection FAIL.
My greatest curiosity is the general habit of skeptics/atheists to reduce each and every discussion to a debate over the existence of God. If these individuals firmly believe that God does not exist and no proof will ever demonstrate otherwise, then why should they waste their time discussing Him?
Because they are not Atheists, but instead hate God, his rules, and his infinite power and superiority
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#957 Sep 20, 2013
BizzyBee wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong!!!! Dukey boy, don't insult me.
I know why, you have a difference in opinion regarding politics. And everything else others post here.
Why?

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#958 Sep 20, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
1. George understands the concepts of friendship, integrity, and maintaining his boundaries. I highly respect and admire people who keep their boundaries and can present intelligent discussion and challenge others but maintain his humanity. Che has not once shown that she has that side. She has a habit of immediately damning people out of the gate for opinions she disagrees with and her pure nastiness and rudeness.
2. Che hasn't revealed much of herself other than "power trips"--telling us she's a lawyer, attempting to dominate others--George does not do that. He's in fact gone out of his way to show his friendship and generosity, in ways you will never know.
3. Che hasn't shown a desire to be friendly. Her only desire seems to be to exude negativity and make enemies. No desire to build trust or credibility.
How's that?
Not very compelling.

1) Che's rude. George is rude. Your "friendship" with Paco is irrelevant. Tie.

2) Same deal. Revealing/not revealing personal information really has little to no bearing on one's arguments. "Friendship", once again..irrelevant. I doubt you've ever met Che, so you would have no way of measuring his generosity or integrity against anyone else's, including Paco.

3) Che is playing you all. He employs George's tactics continuously, and purposefully. If you can't recognize that, that's on you.

woof

3)

3)

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#959 Sep 20, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe it has nothing to do whatsoever with whether they believe in God's existence.
Maybe its because because religious zealots have tried to control the behaviors of others based upon their own religious zealotry for centuries, and they vehemently oppose such nonsense.
Has that thought ever crossed your mind?
woof
I eagerly await your attempt to overthrow our nation's laws.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#960 Sep 20, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe it has nothing to do whatsoever with whether they believe in God's existence.
Maybe its because because religious zealots have tried to control the behaviors of others based upon their own religious zealotry for centuries, and they vehemently oppose such nonsense.
Has that thought ever crossed your mind?
woof
Maybe not? Has that crossed your mind. Some of the calmest, most peaceful, serene people I know believe in God. They generally don't aren't easily swayed by others but simply know their way through life. Their minds aren't cluttered.

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#961 Sep 20, 2013
^^bad editing, gonna toss Che at me?^^^

“PLANET EARTH”

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#962 Sep 20, 2013
This is dedicated to the one, the only, R U

“PLANET EARTH”

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#963 Sep 20, 2013
Duke: 2) Same deal. Revealing/not revealing personal information really has little to no bearing on one's arguments. "Friendship", once again..irrelevant. I doubt you've ever met Che, so you would have no way of measuring his generosity or integrity against anyone else's, including Paco.

The key word is, and I have said it before...Che is a HE!!!!!
Nice slip up Duke.
Like I said, it's all in the approach.

“PLANET EARTH”

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#964 Sep 20, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
^^bad editing, gonna toss Che at me?^^^
Are you shaking in your boots?
LOLOLOLOL

“Queen of my domain”

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#965 Sep 20, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Not very compelling.
1) Che's rude. George is rude. Your "friendship" with Paco is irrelevant. Tie.
2) Same deal. Revealing/not revealing personal information really has little to no bearing on one's arguments. "Friendship", once again..irrelevant. I doubt you've ever met Che, so you would have no way of measuring his generosity or integrity against anyone else's, including Paco.
3) Che is playing you all. He employs George's tactics continuously, and purposefully. If you can't recognize that, that's on you.
woof
3)
3)
George may appear rude to you. That's YOUR experience, remember you asked MINE.

You cannot create any substantive or even functional relationship with someone who acts like an ape on crack. That's Che's behavior.

Che is a lonely, bitter female. If that is her purpose, she'll leave eventually. Folks will figure it out. People come here to discuss ideas, news, tidbits, have laughs. Most of us do laugh at as well as scorn Che's behavior.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#966 Sep 20, 2013
gokeefe wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe not? Has that crossed your mind. Some of the calmest, most peaceful, serene people I know believe in God. They generally don't aren't easily swayed by others but simply know their way through life. Their minds aren't cluttered.
I've got no problem with that.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#967 Sep 20, 2013
BizzyBee wrote:
Duke: 2) Same deal. Revealing/not revealing personal information really has little to no bearing on one's arguments. "Friendship", once again..irrelevant. I doubt you've ever met Che, so you would have no way of measuring his generosity or integrity against anyone else's, including Paco.
The key word is, and I have said it before...Che is a HE!!!!!
Nice slip up Duke.
Like I said, it's all in the approach.
I have no idea what you are referring to. Long long ago, despite Paco's continuously and derisively calling Che a "girl", Che indicated that he was a male.

For some strange reason, I guess I am one of the only few who caught it.

woof

“Tenured Marxist Radical”

Since: Jan 13

Ivy League-ISIS

#968 Sep 20, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
If reasoned argument requires the use continual and consistent use of vitriolic pejoratives, why don't you do it?
woof
George primarily uses perjoratives to illustrate double standards.

I minimize their use because I see it as needless agitation. But posters have different styles.

And by the way, I still want to see your census tract demographics.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chevrolet Malibu Owners: Problems & Solutions (Jun '06) 58 min Rita 2,728
SeriousLady, BizzyBee, Catman Rowdy , everybody... 1 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 25
impeachment 1 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 58
benghazi! 3 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 10
BizzyBee Catman Gokeefe et al 4 hr Big Johnson 80
5 MILLION NEW WORKERS - Omg! 6 hr Matthew 22 21 8
Man Shot Multiple Times In North Columbus Alley 6 hr astonished by ign... 7
Is Barack Obama Doing a Good Job as President? (Aug '13) 13 hr Male 4,553
Columbus Dating
Find my Match

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:44 am PST

ESPN 8:44AM
Texans' Foster (groin) inactive vs. Bengals
Bleacher Report 9:00 AM
Live: Follow Bengals Highlights
NBC Sports 9:49 AM
Glazer: Browns plan to unleash Josh Gordon
Bleacher Report10:19 AM
Watt Plays Catch with Servicemen
NBC Sports10:36 AM
Andre Smith done for the day with an arm injury