Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#2623 Oct 14, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I would actually really be interested in having this conversation with you, should you be able to demonstrate a slightly better grasp of the topic at hand. Please reread my original quote below. If you can explain what I'm saying I would love to bring this conversation with out you further to get your opinion on the type of interaction being described. If you're not able to understand the exchange, I'm afraid I might let you move on to conversation elsewhere as I would quite like to have an intelligent discussion about this type of exchange.
The original excerpt, if you can break it down for me is:
"I wonder if it's not cultural? I don't think I've ever stopped mid conversation (or even argument) with a guy to stop to weigh up their sexual value without a direct prompt. But guys, especially ones on here, seem to make stopping the conversation to weigh in on the perceived sexual value of female participants near constantly.
I'm wondering if this isn't a thing guys, or guys of a specific age or generation do. It's really interesting to see an extra, gendered layer to processing and discussions that I don't really see as having a direct response in gross gendered female-to-male interactions. "
and again....you utilizing the words sexual value is a scream period.

nasty ugly fat women have little sexual value.

it is only after man consumes 10 shots of whiskey where sexual value consideration with women like you begins, and then when determined you possibly may have sexual value, the man passes out drunk.

is this why you are so militant?
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#2624 Oct 14, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I would actually really be interested in having this conversation with you, should you be able to demonstrate a slightly better grasp of the topic at hand. Please reread my original quote below. If you can explain what I'm saying I would love to bring this conversation with out you further to get your opinion on the type of interaction being described. If you're not able to understand the exchange, I'm afraid I might let you move on to conversation elsewhere as I would quite like to have an intelligent discussion about this type of exchange.
The original excerpt, if you can break it down for me is:
"I wonder if it's not cultural? I don't think I've ever stopped mid conversation (or even argument) with a guy to stop to weigh up their sexual value without a direct prompt. But guys, especially ones on here, seem to make stopping the conversation to weigh in on the perceived sexual value of female participants near constantly.
I'm wondering if this isn't a thing guys, or guys of a specific age or generation do. It's really interesting to see an extra, gendered layer to processing and discussions that I don't really see as having a direct response in gross gendered female-to-male interactions. "
debating sexual value with a Pug is a waste of time.
They cannot kill a Spook

Detroit, MI

#2625 Oct 14, 2013
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
and again....you utilizing the words sexual value is a scream period.
nasty ugly fat women have little sexual value.
it is only after man consumes 10 shots of whiskey where sexual value consideration with women like you begins, and then when determined you possibly may have sexual value, the man passes out drunk.
is this why you are so militant?
transposition has no value period. It claims to have moved to England yet constantly complains the USA is not like England. My suspicion is it is a nothing but a welfare tramp living in Colemanistan or another turd world city.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#2626 Oct 14, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder if it's not cultural? I don't think I've ever stopped mid conversation (or even argument) with a guy to stop to weigh up their sexual value without a direct prompt. But guys, especially ones on here, seem to make stopping the conversation to weigh in on the perceived sexual value of female participants near constantly.
I'm wondering if this isn't a thing guys, or guys of a specific age or generation do. It's really interesting to see an extra, gendered layer to processing and discussions that I don't really see as having a direct response in gross gendered female-to-male interactions.
You have to factor in the extreme sexual repression occasioned by their mothers and their church.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#2627 Oct 14, 2013
BEST. EXCHANGE. EVER.

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#2628 Oct 14, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You have to factor in the extreme sexual repression occasioned by their mothers and their church.
Yes, we know your mother was an atheist wh#re, Che.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#2629 Oct 14, 2013
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, we know your mother was an atheist wh#re, Che.
Amazing how you knew I was referring to you, Nate.

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#2630 Oct 14, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing how you knew I was referring to you, Nate.
You were referring to anyone not like you, kid. That's most normal people.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#2631 Oct 14, 2013
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>You were referring to anyone not like you, kid. That's most normal people.
No. I was referring to a few very specific people, you being one of them.

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#2632 Oct 14, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No. I was referring to a few very specific people, you being one of them.
Struck a nerve, did I, kid?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#2633 Oct 14, 2013
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>Struck a nerve, did I, kid?
Not at all. I was simply correcting one of your routine gross mischaracterizations.

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#2634 Oct 14, 2013
So...there's no real chance of having an intelligent conversation about this? I think the dynamic is pretty interesting but am happy to take it to a more appropriate forum if it's not really the type of thing folks are interested in.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#2635 Oct 14, 2013
tranpsosition wrote:
So...there's no real chance of having an intelligent conversation about this? I think the dynamic is pretty interesting but am happy to take it to a more appropriate forum if it's not really the type of thing folks are interested in.
It's not that they lack the interest. They lack the ability.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#2636 Oct 14, 2013
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>Yes, we know your mother was an atheist wh#re, Che.
Would it be better if she were a Christian Wh#re instead?

woof

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#2637 Oct 14, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Would it be better if she were a Christian Wh#re instead?
woof
Ask Mary Magdalene.

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#2638 Oct 14, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not that they lack the interest. They lack the ability.
Now there's some serious projection. As GK correctly points out, your only reason for being here is to troll.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#2639 Oct 14, 2013
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>Now there's some serious projection. As GK correctly points out, your only reason for being here is to troll.
This is coming more into focus. When I disagree with the wingnut stated position, I am a troll. When you call someone's mother a whooore or a black person a "ni###r" that is substance.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#2640 Oct 14, 2013
Trayvonius Martinez wrote:
<quoted text>Ask Mary Magdalene.
I can't. She is deceased. Besides, I am asking you.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#2641 Oct 14, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
This is coming more into focus. When I disagree with the wingnut stated position, I am a troll. When you call someone's mother a whooore or a black person a "ni###r" that is substance.
These double standards are becoming quite difficult to keep track of without a rule book. I wonder if the Sheriff will post a link to the rules.

He likes links.

woof

“Seven Days In May”

Since: Oct 13

Hilliard, OH

#2642 Oct 14, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
This is coming more into focus. When I disagree with the wingnut stated position, I am a troll. When you call someone's mother a whooore or a black person a "ni###r" that is substance.
That's about the size of it, cvnt.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Statistics of Wars Throughout History 4 min free pIzza 4 U 73
Kirkland Cult Murders 7 min d pantz 20
Obama Admits Communist Davis “Schooled” Him 17 min Duke for Mayor 99
Man's obituary has one very specific request…. 31 min Norm DePlume 1
Do Atheist Firemen go to Hell or Heaven? 46 min d pantz 90
Most Of History's Mid-’90s Anti-Hillary Rant St... 58 min Norm DePlume 1
Nazi bookkeeper on trial 1 hr Duke for Mayor 10
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]