Deputy director of the CIA, Michael M...
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#23 Jun 13, 2013
CIA Deputy Director Steps Down 'To Spend More Time With His Family'- See more at: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/cia-deputy-di...

Anyone ever see "Deep Impact"? This time it's not a meteor, it's a meathead named Barack.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#24 Jun 13, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>And here we have a 'lawyer' defending the trashing of the First Amendment because he's offended that his tin god Barry Soetoro is being criticized.
Maybe you should read the law.

woof

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#25 Jun 13, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you should read the law.
woof
Maybe you should read the article:

"The Secret Service had a thick FBI file- filled with screenshots of hundreds of posts. Said Tom,“I flat out told them ‘I have NEVER threatened Obama’s life! Yes, I despise him as you can plainly see, but I have that right!’ They actually ADMITTED and agreed with me that I hadn’t threatened Obama.”

But hey...mosques are off limits, so it's all good, right?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#26 Jun 13, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>And here we have a 'lawyer' defending the trashing of the First Amendment because he's offended that his tin god Barry Soetoro is being criticized.
How does the Secret Service investigating threats against the POTUS violate the First Amendment?

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#27 Jun 13, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
How does the Secret Service investigating threats against the POTUS violate the First Amendment?
I guess the word, "intimidation" isn't on your GED vocabulary list.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#29 Jun 13, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
How does the Secret Service investigating threats against the POTUS violate the First Amendment?
BTW...what threats?

"...They actually ADMITTED and agreed with me that I hadn’t threatened Obama.”

Even paralegals know when the word "alleged" should be used.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#31 Jun 13, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>I guess the word, "intimidation" isn't on your GED vocabulary list.
That isn't an anwser to the question. That is a hamfisted attempt at deflection.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#32 Jun 13, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>BTW...what threats?
"...They actually ADMITTED and agreed with me that I hadn’t threatened Obama.”
Even paralegals know when the word "alleged" should be used.
By the way, where is your alleged First Amendment violation?

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#33 Jun 13, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
That isn't an anwser to the question. That is a hamfisted attempt at deflection.
Now you're so desperate that you're trying to change the definition of "deflection."
Surely a "lawyer" like you has heard the term, "chilling effect on free speech." That's what intimidation in a case like this is.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#34 Jun 13, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
How does the Secret Service investigating threats against the POTUS violate the First Amendment?
What threats?

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#35 Jun 13, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way, where is your alleged First Amendment violation?
Actually, it's more closely fits the definition of terrorism.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

#36 Jun 13, 2013
I heard that the novel, 1984, is flying off the shelves.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#37 Jun 13, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
I heard that the novel, 1984, is flying off the shelves.
Probably one of the five most influential novels ever published. Also one of the most banned.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#38 Jun 13, 2013
-Clayton Bigsby wrote:
<quoted text>Now you're so desperate that you're trying to change the definition of "deflection."
Surely a "lawyer" like you has heard the term, "chilling effect on free speech." That's what intimidation in a case like this is.
I don't believe you would find a single case that would hold that a single interview by law enforcement would create a chilling effect.

-Clayton Bigsby

Since: Apr 13

Hilliard, OH

#39 Jun 13, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't believe you would find a single case that would hold that a single interview by law enforcement would create a chilling effect.
Your opinion is noted but probably impossible to prove.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Why are Trump's Kids so ugly? 16 min Reality 87
Trump Borrowed $ From Russians, A Tax Secret Mu... 43 min Duke for Mayor 10
Hog on the trough or can? 1 hr Dan Rather 1
Dems in disarray- Well, yeah! 1 hr Myothernameisdpants 985
What do you think? Pretty cool, huh? 2 hr Pip Rademaker 4
Trump Will Win Again in 2020 6 hr White Knight 19
Robert Mueller Investigating Donald Trump 6 hr 404 not found 583
News Scandal forces appraisal of gay issues | The Co... (Oct '10) Sun Real Curious 305

Columbus Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Columbus Mortgages