Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#702 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
How deep is that rabbit hole?
First post on this issue:
http://www.topix.com/forum/columbus/T5QUMMEED...
It is impossible for homosexuals [i.e., a same-sex couple] to produce children as biological proof of their physical union.
A hetereosexual with a child means it was born of the current marriage? Ask Georgie if that one is true.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#703 Apr 24, 2013
FKA Reader wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither can obedient nuns and priests.
What is your point?
A nun and a priest have the biological potential to produce a child, should they physically couple.

Two same-sex individuals do not. Ever.

Go help Che.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#704 Apr 24, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hell, lots of heterosexuals have sex outside "a domestic partnership", so why can't homosexuals?
Ms. Hale agreed to abide by the moral requirements of the Church for the duration of her employment.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#705 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
I've encountered rocks smarter than you.
Is the word "shared" important in your scenario or not?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#706 Apr 24, 2013
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hell, lots of heterosexuals have sex outside "a domestic partnership", so why can't homosexuals?
Because God has reserved infidelity for the heteros.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#707 Apr 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
A hetereosexual with a child means it was born of the current marriage? Ask Georgie if that one is true.
You couldn't stay on-topic to save your life.

The obvious point is that a homosexual union is biologically disordered.
And the Church, based on God's Word, declares it to be morally disordered.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#708 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously, you're running out of air down there?
Shall I send Reader to rescue you?
She knows her way around the rabbit hole very well.
Which is it? The sex or the living arrangement?

Anne always insists that all of her gay friends aren't going to Hell unless they actually touch each others dingies. Should she be trying to save them because they share the same apartment?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#709 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
A nun and a priest have the biological potential to produce a child, should they physically couple.
Two same-sex individuals do not. Ever.
Go help Che.
So do a gay man and a lesbian.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#710 Apr 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Is the word "shared" important in your scenario or not?
I'll have Reader bring the large oxygen tank.
Because I'm a compassionate conservative.
They cannot kill a Spook

Detroit, MI

#711 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
A nun and a priest have the biological potential to produce a child, should they physically couple.
Two same-sex individuals do not. Ever.
Go help Che.
I would bet priests boning nuns happens a much more often than priests boning alter boys.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#712 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
You couldn't stay on-topic to save your life.
The obvious point is that a homosexual union is biologically disordered.
And the Church, based on God's Word, declares it to be morally disordered.
No, no, Tippo. You said that Gokeefe's child was proof she had sex with her ex-husband. You are the one changing the subject. That child just as easily could be proof she had sex with the milkman.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#713 Apr 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
So do a gay man and a lesbian.
You're fading fast.
I'll send a back-up tank.

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#714 Apr 24, 2013
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
No, no, Tippo. You said that Gokeefe's child was proof she had sex with her ex-husband. You are the one changing the subject. That child just as easily could be proof she had sex with the milkman.
As a typical leftist who has failed to make an argument, you have resorted to impugning character.

Bravo! I'll take that white flag from you now.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#715 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
At the very least, Ms. Hale's public announcement of her living arrangement provides the impression that she is a participant in a same-sex relationship and, therefore, has breached her contract, harming the reputation of the Church.
That she has no intent to repent of this moral failure and remedy the situation provides the Church no choice but to enforce its contract, the terms of which she agreed to.
I think she signed a contract that bound her to abide by the Church's principles. Let's see what they say about homosexuality:

http://www.catholic.com/tracts/homosexuality

"However, the Church also acknowledges that "[homosexuality’s] psychological genesis remains largely unexplained.... The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s cross the difficulties that they may encounter from their condition.

"Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection" (CCC 2357– 2359)."

Show me the proof Tippyhead, via the obit, that she is not living a "chaste" life.

Show me the proof Tippyhead, that the Church is "accepting her with respect, compassion, and sensitivity", and "avoiding every sign of unjust discrimination in her regard".

woof

“animis opibusque parati”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#716 Apr 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
...Show me the proof Tippyhead, via the obit, that she is not living a "chaste" life.
Show me the proof Tippyhead, that the Church is "accepting her with respect, compassion, and sensitivity", and "avoiding every sign of unjust discrimination in her regard".
woof
To review, Ms. Hale publicly announced that she is living with a domestic partner.

***
domes&#8242;tic part&#8242;ner
n.
either member of an unmarried, cohabiting, and esp. homosexual couple that seeks benefits usu. available only to spouses.
***

"Chaste" and "spouse" are, in the minds of sane individuals, mutually exclusive.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#717 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll have Reader bring the large oxygen tank.
Because I'm a compassionate conservative.
I'll take that as either your admission you don't know or your admission that any true answer to the question concedes that you stepped on it.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#718 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
As a typical leftist who has failed to make an argument, you have resorted to impugning character.
Bravo! I'll take that white flag from you now.
Impugning character? Not at all. You were the one who made the unfortunate choice to use Gokeefe as an example.

So we will try again. The presence of a child in a heterosexual relationship proves that the female in that relationship conceived and delivered a child. Beyond that, other proof is needed.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#719 Apr 24, 2013
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
I think she signed a contract that bound her to abide by the Church's principles. Let's see what they say about homosexuality:
http://www.catholic.com/tracts/homosexuality
"However, the Church also acknowledges that "[homosexuality’s] psychological genesis remains largely unexplained.... The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. This inclination, which is objectively disordered, constitutes for most of them a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s cross the difficulties that they may encounter from their condition.
"Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection" (CCC 2357– 2359)."
Show me the proof Tippyhead, via the obit, that she is not living a "chaste" life.
Show me the proof Tippyhead, that the Church is "accepting her with respect, compassion, and sensitivity", and "avoiding every sign of unjust discrimination in her regard".
woof
Her attorney is going to have some fun with that.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#720 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
To review, Ms. Hale publicly announced that she is living with a domestic partner.
***
domes&#8242;tic part&#8242;ner
n.
either member of an unmarried, cohabiting, and esp. homosexual couple that seeks benefits usu. available only to spouses.
***
"Chaste" and "spouse" are, in the minds of sane individuals, mutually exclusive.
So people who are medically unable to perform coitus cannot be married?
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

#721 Apr 24, 2013
-tip- wrote:
<quoted text>
"Chaste" and "spouse" are, in the minds of sane individuals, mutually exclusive.
You may wish to research the foundation of that statement a bit.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Columbus Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Are you a STAR WARS FAN? 3 hr d pantz 75
Freddie Gray riots in Baltimore 3 hr d pantz 283
Why would anybody come on here if Topix is dele... 3 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 7
Taylor House , 5001 Olentangy River Road, Colum... 3 hr Floor 4 21
RATS with furry tails! 4 hr They cannot kill ... 3
Ex Philadelphia football player claims head coa... 4 hr Pope Che Reagan C... 17
English Chunnel opens 5 hr bizzybeefour 14
Crossville TN topix moderator admits to deletin... 5 hr Yes 2 Laudatory 42
More from around the web

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]