Assault Weapons Ban 'Just the Beginning'
Posted in the Columbus Forum
“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”
Since: Dec 12
#1 Mar 11, 2013
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), a member of the Democratic Party’s leadership in the House of Representatives, suggested to Jason Mattera at a Feb. 13 women’s rights rally that plans for an assault weapons ban and private-sales background checks were only the beginning of a broader gun control agenda extending to handguns as well.
Schakowsky evidently did not recognize Mattera, a conservative video journalist and senior investigative reporter for Talk Radio Network, who infamously confronted Vice President Joe Biden in the Capitol.(Mattera introduced himself to Schakowsky by name but did not indicate that he was filming or that he is conservative.) She spoke to Mattera as if he were a fellow gun control enthusiast--and Mattera played along, eliciting answers about Schakowsky’s enthusiasm for gun control.
“We want everything on the table,” Schakowsky told Mattera.“This is a moment of opportunity. There’s no question about it.”
One poignant exchange was as follows:
Schakowsky: We’re on a roll now, and I think we’ve got to take the--you know, we’re gonna push as hard as we can and as far as we can.
Mattera: So the assault weapons ban is just the beginning?
Schakowsky: Oh absolutely. I mean, I’m against handguns. We have, in Illinois, the Council Against Handgun... something [Violence]. Yeah, I’m a member of that. So, absolutely.
In another exchange, Schakowsky proposed allowances for states and municipalities to ban guns--though such laws have been repeatedly rejected by the Supreme Court:
Mattera: We’ll never get a handgun ban with the Second Amendment as stated.
Schakowsky: I don’t know. I don’t know that we can’t. And there may be an allowance, once again, for communities--I have communities in my district that prohibited handguns within their borders. The rights of municipalities and states to view that as a sensible way to keep people safe--I don’t think it’s precluded.
When Mattera asked why legislators were not pressing for a handgun ban, given that most murders are committed with handguns, Schakowsky replied:“Because we’re not going to be able to win that. Not now.” She went on to explain why background checks were a useful interim policy, arguing that they would “address any kind of weapon.”
Schakowsky’s remarks about plans for broader gun control are not the first time she has revealed the long-term goal behind short-term policy debates. She has a tendency to do so when speaking to apparently sympathetic audiences. In 2009, she told a crowd that the goal of Obamacare would be to “put the private insurance industry out of business.”
Since: Oct 10
#3 Mar 11, 2013
While I wouldn't put it exactly that way, have to agree. NO ONE I speak to is for the government imposing any more gun regulations. EVERYONE I talk to are buying their first or more guns.
"There is not one thing the government can do to prevent one criminal act" is the mantra I hear,
#5 Mar 11, 2013
"Come on baby, I promise I'll only stick in the tip."
Keep voting Democrat, Lol
Add your comments below
|NAACP calls for calm in Cleveland||4 min||BizzyBee||8|
|Pressure Cooker found at National Mall||8 min||BizzyBee||1|
|Police officer's estimate good enough for speed... (Jun '10)||28 min||ty Ree||332|
|Black Crime is out of control.||4 hr||Versace||70|
|Al Sharpton coming to Cleveland......||10 hr||Pope Che Reagan C...||15|
|Al-Maliki: U.S. forces wona t stay after 2011 |... (Nov '10)||11 hr||swedenforever||5|
|Brelo not guilty||15 hr||Pope Che Reagan C...||37|
Find what you want!
Search Columbus Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC