Commentary: Stonewall Columbus Pride Parade reminiscent of a Fourth of July parade

Jun 23, 2013 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Lantern

A Pride Parade walker looks to throw bracelets at crowds that lined the street. Pride Parade, part of Stonewall Columbus Pride Festival 2013, took place June 22 on High Street.

Comments
561 - 580 of 605 Comments Last updated Jul 20, 2013

DNF

“Religious Freedom to Marry”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH / Baltimore MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#588
Jul 10, 2013
 
Lefty Lehman wrote:
The strongest argument against perv marriage is that sodomy and abortion proclivities of perverts are not worthy of a public subsidy via a marriage license.
In the not so distant past, local goverments and state governments would deny a marriage license for a variety of good reasons....
The things you mention are predominantly heterosexual activities. In the not so distant past, the LEGAL definition of sodomy laws stated that any sex act outside penile/vaginal penetration was deemed sodomy.
Lefty Lehman wrote:
sodomy
elective abortion
obscenity
child endangerment
mental deficiency
STD
moral turpitude
criminal behavior
And all those are found to be much higher among heterosexuals. It's basic math. You have a larger % of the total population and therefore make up the majority of criminals.
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Organized perverts used shyster lawyer methods and fedgov bullying to eliminate the power of local governments to impose minimum standards for acquiring a marriage license.
Yes but let's leave the Vatican and the American Council of Catholic Bishops out of this OK?
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Perverts have caused the problem of many bad hetero marriages today, due to their deliberate crusade to eliminate minimum standards imposed by state and local government.
Perv shysters successfully maneuvered to get elective abortion, sodomy, pornography, AIDS treatment and hate speech prosecutions all recognized and protected as federal civil rights.
Bearing false witness violates the 9th Commandment of God. So why do you defy God? There IS an effort to prosecute hate speech by religious leaders, but every gay person I know opposes it.

As a person with AIDS I can assure you there are far more heterosexuals spreading it than gays. In the not so distant past, CDC announced that HIV is increasing at a greater rate among heterosexual women and heterosexual seniors than it is among gay men. And lesbians have the lowest incidents of HIV of all groups. and when it comes to eliminating minimum standards that would be the Republican party
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Pervs often refer to their proclivities as love, perverting language too. If you've been paying any attention, you would notice that mass media never mention the word "sodomy" anymore.
Maybe because there are no longer laws about it? Ergo it ain't news except for you peeping Tom types.
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Mass media perverts refer to sodomy as anal sex or oral sex, perverting the original meaning of the word sex, a reproductive act. Likewise, abortion is referred to as a "reproductive right" by mass media perverts.
Didn't you just say the mass media never mentions any of this. You must have awesome legs from jumping your own fence all the time. Just like the "Let the people decide" mantra. Now that the tide has turned the anti-gays don't want the people to vote. They say "we already decided this back in....". Using that logic we should still; be able to own slaves and women shouldn't vote!
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Why grant a public license for licentiousness?
Because you like having bars have happy hour.

DNF

“Religious Freedom to Marry”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH / Baltimore MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#589
Jul 10, 2013
 
Lefty Lehman wrote:
....likeewise, abortion is referred to as a "reproductive right" by mass media perverts.
Public support of marriage is originally intended for the purpose of raising children, not supporting adult hedonism and licentiousness.
So now an infertile woman is a hedonist? Catholics who use the rhythm methods are now hedonistic perverts?

LMAO
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Why should public resources support typical LGBTQ licentious behaviors such as sodomy, abortion,
How many gay men do you know who had abortions?
Lefty Lehman wrote:
STD disease proliferation, promiscuity, and pornography?
All very popular among heterosexuals.
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Why should the public support any LGBTQ diversity schemes?
Conversely why should the government support Churches with tax exempt status while they impose their hedonistic agenda onto the public??
Lefty Lehman wrote:
LGBTQ are well known leaders of abortion on demand. It is fairly ridiculous to grant a marriage license, which originally was public support for raising children, to people that promote infanticide as a national virtue.
I'm glad you brought up abortion. Now I can ask you why the rights of the unborn matter more than the rights of the children now living?
Lefty Lehman wrote:
With all of the recent news of homosexual child molestation and multi-drug resistant diseases associated with HIV infection, it makes zero sense to support LGBTQ behaviors. The public puts prostitutes in jail for doing less vile things than LGBTQ.
Umm the recent news articles I have seen about child molesting are about heterosexuals.

The BSA has had a scandal as large as the R.C. C. but I don't see you giving that any attention. Perhaps because homosexuals were banned and therefore the molesters had to be heterosexual males.
Lefty Lehman wrote:
Why grant a public license for licentiousness?
Great question. So please explain why the majority of heterosexuals are all in favor of bars and strip clubs. Why certain stores will sell Hustlers and other vulgar rags but refuse to carry the Advocate?And those heterosexual children doing all that sexting?
The ones who pass these laws are heterosexuals (many of who are conservative religious men BTW) so you can't really blame any of this on the LBGTQ community without appearing as a complete ass.

But I'm delighted you just did.
Broseph

New Castle, DE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#590
Jul 10, 2013
 
Wait what wrote:
You can argue all you like, but check out the new medical forms:
Marital Status - Single, Divorced, Widowed,(OR) PARTNERED
Eventually it will encompass all 50 states, and nothing is going to stop it.
^Pretty much.

/Thread

DNF

“Religious Freedom to Marry”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH / Baltimore MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#591
Jul 10, 2013
 
To lefty Lehman:

Romans 12:2

New International Version (©2011)
Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is--his good, pleasing and perfect will.

New Living Translation (©2007)
Don't copy the behavior and customs of this world, but let God transform you into a new person by changing the way you think. Then you will learn to know God's will for you, which is good and pleasing and perfect.

English Standard Version (©2001)
Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.

New American Standard Bible (©1995)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect.

King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

Holman Christian Standard Bible (©2009)
Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may discern what is the good, pleasing, and perfect will of God.

International Standard Version (©2012)
Do not be conformed to this world, but continuously be transformed by the renewing of your minds so that you may be able to determine what God's will is—what is proper, pleasing, and perfect.

NET Bible (©2006)
Do not be conformed to this present world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may test and approve what is the will of God--what is good and well-pleasing and perfect.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010)
And do not imitate this world, but be transformed by the renovation of your minds, and you shall distinguish what is the good, acceptable and perfect will of God.

http://biblehub.com/romans/12-2.htm

Like I've always said about folks like you. You talk the talk but have no feet to walk the walk.
Lefty Lehman

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#592
Jul 11, 2013
 
DNF wrote:
To lefty Lehman:
lotsa crap
I am not a religious person, peabrain.

Don't need a religious argument to understand the facts I've presented....

The strongest argument against perv marriage is that sodomy and abortion proclivities of perverts are not worthy of a public subsidy via a marriage license.

In the not so distant past, local goverments and state governments could deny a marriage license for a variety of good reasons....

sodomy
elective abortion
obscenity
child endangerment
mental deficiency
STD
moral turpitude
criminality

Perverts used typical shyster lawyer methods and fedgov bullying to eliminate the power of local governments to impose minimum standards for acquiring a marriage license. Perverts have caused the problem of many bad marriages today, due to their deliberate crusade to eliminate minimum standards imposed by state and local government.

Perv shysters successfully lobbied to get elective abortion, sodomy, pornography, AIDS treatment and hate speech prosecutions all recognized and protected as federal civil rights.
Pervs often refer to their proclivities as love, perverting language too. If you've been paying any attention, you'd notice that mass media never mention the word "sodomy" anymore. Mass media perverts refer to sodomy as anal sex or oral sex, perverting the original meaning of the word sex, a reproductive act. Likewise, abortion is referred to as a "reproductive right" by mass media perverts.

Public support of marriage is originally intended for the purpose of raising children, not supporting adult hedonism and licentiousness. Why should public resources support typical LGBTQ licentious behaviors such as sodomy, abortion, STD disease proliferation, promiscuity, and pornography? Why should the public support any LGBTQ Diversity schemes?

LGBTQ are well known leaders of abortion on demand. It is fairly ridiculous to grant a marriage license, which originally is public support for raising children, to people that promote infanticide as a national virtue.

With all of the recent news of homosexual child molestation and multi-drug resistant diseases associated with HIV infection, it makes zero sense to support LGBTQ behaviors. The public puts prostitutes in jail for doing less vile things than LGBTQ.

Why grant a public license for licentiousness?

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#593
Jul 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

"after all that's been done to us", he said.

All that's been done to YOU? You masculine-oriented (tops) homosexuals perpetrated genocide against the Jews in ww2. Yes, all hitler's inner-circles were gay men - the storm troopers, the brownshirts, you name it.

And one influential homosexual was quoted as saying, "what they did to Mathew Shepherd is nothing compared to how older gay men are giving aids to very young men".

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#594
Jul 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Let me guess...You rednecks hate gays too, right?
Broseph

New Castle, DE

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#595
Jul 11, 2013
 
Listen4truth wrote:
"after all that's been done to us", he said.
All that's been done to YOU? You masculine-oriented (tops) homosexuals perpetrated genocide against the Jews in ww2. Yes, all hitler's inner-circles were gay men - the storm troopers, the brownshirts, you name it.
And one influential homosexual was quoted as saying, "what they did to Mathew Shepherd is nothing compared to how older gay men are giving aids to very young men".
^Bitter Gay Guy Alert.*weeeee wooooo weeee woooooo*

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#597
Jul 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

"Equality" exacts a terrible toll to society. "Equality" is beneficial...but only to a tiny minority of the population. For the rest, it's facism and imperialism. Take a gander at the list of victims who had to be sacrificed on the altar of gay "rights": gayharms.blogspot.com/

"Equality" says: "...dissagreement with our goals will be punishable by law."

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#598
Jul 11, 2013
 
Listen4truth wrote:
"Equality" exacts a terrible toll to society. "Equality" is beneficial...but only to a tiny minority of the population. For the rest, it's facism and imperialism. Take a gander at the list of victims who had to be sacrificed on the altar of gay "rights": gayharms.blogspot.com/
"Equality" says: "...dissagreement with our goals will be punishable by law."
"Disagreement" is not punishable by law. It's freedom of speech. Forcibly removing or denying those human rights you disagree with for no good reason is against the law.

Answer me this. Why did God give us free will?
Johnny Smoke

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#600
Jul 11, 2013
 
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
"Disagreement" is not punishable by law. It's freedom of speech. Forcibly removing or denying those human rights you disagree with for no good reason is against the law.
Answer me this. Why did God give us free will?
The 1st amendment is a restriction on the fedgov, not the people.

Libertine hicks like you falsely re-interpret the 1st amendment ass backwards. Libertine hicks believe the fedgov can force local communities to accept pornography and obcenity as legitimate speech and that fedgov can prosecute hate speech. Hicks like you also believe that fedgov can legitmately add extra taxes on church organizations based on their peculiar speech inside a church.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#603
Jul 11, 2013
 
Johnny Smoke wrote:
<quoted text>
The 1st amendment is a restriction on the fedgov, not the people.
I'm aware of that and didn't say or imply anything to the contrary. It was the person I replied to who claimed that government will punish him ("by law") for disagreeing. I was just explaining why they're not.

You are confused.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#604
Jul 12, 2013
 
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me guess.......you so full of semen, you're like a fat tick, ready to pop.
LMFAO
What a crass low brow thing to say...

I bet you are a redneck.

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#606
Jul 12, 2013
 
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>But True none the less
True that you're a dumbass?

Absolutely.
Mikey

Fullerton, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#608
Jul 12, 2013
 
Lefty Lehman wrote:
<quoted text>
I am not a religious person, peabrain.
That's obvious..and you're perverted with bigotry...

“Bullsh*% Detector Enabled”

Since: Dec 08

Brooklyn, New York

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#610
Jul 12, 2013
 
Pepper wrote:
<quoted text>Says the tick about to pop.
LMFAO
Says the dumbass.
Lefty Lehman

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#611
Jul 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
That's obvious..and you're perverted with bigotry...
It's apparent your idea of perversion is very different from that of a normal person.

That is to be expected with LGBTQ thought processes.

If more healthy prejudice were in force, many RCC altar boys could have been saved from closeted male homosexual sodomy attacks.

Cancer research would be more advanced if not for AIDS activist sucking down most of the taxpayer funded research dollars. The queer and druggie people's disease called AIDS is the only peculiar disease that gets it's own dedicated fedgov political website...

http://aids.gov/

Only AIDS disease gets special attention from the people in power. No other serious killer disease gets a similar level of fedgov politcal concern or funding. For example, there is no fedgov website dedicated to diabetes or heart disease.

That is just one of many indications of who hold the power strings.
Johnny Smoke

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#612
Jul 13, 2013
 
TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm aware of that and didn't say or imply anything to the contrary. It was the person I replied to who claimed that government will punish him ("by law") for disagreeing. I was just explaining why they're not.
You are confused.
Your previous reference to "free speech" can be assumed to be within the context of the contemporary fedgov definition of free speech.

Currently, the fedgov assumes it is the primary arbiter of what is legitimate speech, which is a contradiction of the letter and spirit of the 1st amendment.

The fedgov does in fact selectively punish non-diverse people for hate speech, and it selectively punishes people for revealing so-called state secrets, so your former reply is false.

“Ludibrium est onus genio”

Since: Dec 11

Planet Earth

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#613
Jul 13, 2013
 
Johnny Smoke wrote:
<quoted text>
Your previous reference to "free speech" can be assumed to be within the context of the contemporary fedgov definition of free speech.
Currently, the fedgov assumes it is the primary arbiter of what is legitimate speech, which is a contradiction of the letter and spirit of the 1st amendment.
The fedgov does in fact selectively punish non-diverse people for hate speech, and it selectively punishes people for revealing so-called state secrets, so your former reply is false.
What the Federal government does has nothing to do with what I believe. I support Snowden. I also support free speech except for the obvious... libel, slander, threats of harm, creating undue alarm, etc.
Johnny Smoke

Dayton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#614
Jul 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

TonyD2 wrote:
<quoted text>
What the Federal government does has nothing to do with what I believe. I support Snowden. I also support free speech except for the obvious... libel, slander, threats of harm, creating undue alarm, etc.
The question is not what you believe is legitimate speech.

The question is who or what has the constitutional authority to police what is legitimate speech.

Most people will say the fedgov, and they are obviously wrong.

Libertarians typically can't say who should police speech because they don't recognize the legitimacy of local government, the people's government.

Who or what do you recognize as the rightful policing force of legitimate speech? Don't claim yourself, because that would be a joke on you.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Columbus News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Columbus
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••