US won’t be returning to moon, NASA chief says (Obama Strikes Again)

Posted in the Columbus Forum

Comments (Page 4)

Showing posts 61 - 80 of106
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
Apr 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Another bad joke. See, Carrot Top, I'm catching on.
That one wasn't a joke. Brian Terry's family will tell you that.
You're a backwards specimen, little girl.

“Old Right”

Since: Jan 13

State-Run Media

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Apr 8, 2013
 

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
Apr 8, 2013
 
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't a previous NASA head get ripped for AGW comments?
Would explain why they want to shrink it, not to mention that it's in red states.(Canaveral-FL, Houston-TX I refuse to call it by its actual name, Redstone-AL)
Only NASA facility I can think of in a blue state is Vandenburg and JPL in CA.
Wallops Island and Langley in VA, Goddard Center in MD, Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ames and Dryden in CA, White Sands, NM.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Apr 8, 2013
 
If NASA wants to heavy launch from a true Blue State, they have only one real choice...Hawaii. CA can only support heavy launches for polar orbits.

Since: Jan 12

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Apr 8, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Navy's New Laser Weapon Blasts Bad Guys From Air, Sea
No longer the fantasy weapon of tomorrow, the U.S. Navy is set to field a powerful laser that can protect its ships by blasting targets with high-intensity light beams.
Early next year the Navy will place a laser weapon aboard a ship in the Persian Gulf where it could be used to fend off approaching unmanned aerial vehicles or speedboats.
The Navy calls its futuristic weapon LAWS, which stands for the Laser Weapon System. What looks like a small telescope is actually a weapon that can track a moving target and fire a steady laser beam strong enough to burn a hole through steel.

A Navy video of testing conducted last summer off the coast of California shows how a laser beam fired from a Navy destroyer was able to set aflame an approaching UAV or drone, sending it crashing into the ocean.
"There was not a single miss" during the testing, said Rear Admiral Matthew Klunder, chief of Naval Research. The laser was three for three in bringing down an approaching unmanned aerial vehicle and 12 for 12 when previous tests are factored in.

Soooo, we need to walk on the moon again for what reason? With this kind of technology, I don't see the any reason to fund NASA other than having a payroll for a bunch of scientists and astronauts.

I think the moon landing was a hoax anyway. We've had several craft explode in mid air before breaking earth's gravity, yet they claim the technology we had in 1969 successfully put a human on the moon, and then returned them in a 'pod' that had no jet propulsion powerful enough that would get it off the moon's surface and back into our atmosphere!

That Hollywood studio stunt was done to fool the Russians. The insiders know it was a fake set up.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>That one wasn't a joke. Brian Terry's family will tell you that.
You're a backwards specimen, little girl.
Oh. That one was just another of your non sequiturs designed to divert attention away from an argument you were losing. I got it.
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
Didn't a previous NASA head get ripped for AGW comments?
Would explain why they want to shrink it, not to mention that it's in red states.(Canaveral-FL, Houston-TX I refuse to call it by its actual name, Redstone-AL)
Only NASA facility I can think of in a blue state is Vandenburg and JPL in CA.
Ohio.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Apr 9, 2013
 

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Apr 9, 2013
 
WISE AMERICAN wrote:
Soooo, we need to walk on the moon again for what reason? With this kind of technology, I don't see the any reason to fund NASA other than having a payroll for a bunch of scientists and astronauts.
I think the moon landing was a hoax anyway. We've had several craft explode in mid air before breaking earth's gravity, yet they claim the technology we had in 1969 successfully put a human on the moon, and then returned them in a 'pod' that had no jet propulsion powerful enough that would get it off the moon's surface and back into our atmosphere!
That Hollywood studio stunt was done to fool the Russians. The insiders know it was a fake set up.
Sometimes, WA, you're a smart guy. This isn't one of those times.

First, how do you fake and keep a secret when millions of people are involved? SIX TIMES, no less.
Second, do you really think the Soviets weren't watching and tracking every second, including the communications direction and time lag?
Third, why would we fake Apollo 13?
Fourth, how can you discount the evidence?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evid...

Now, a quick refresher on the Apollo spacecraft and its modules:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_%28spacec...

Please note the difference and functions of each module.

“Old Right”

Since: Jan 13

State-Run Media

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Apr 9, 2013
 
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>
Sometimes, WA, you're a smart guy. This isn't one of those times.
First, how do you fake and keep a secret when millions of people are involved? SIX TIMES, no less.
Second, do you really think the Soviets weren't watching and tracking every second, including the communications direction and time lag?
Third, why would we fake Apollo 13?
Fourth, how can you discount the evidence?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evid...
Now, a quick refresher on the Apollo spacecraft and its modules:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_%28spacec...
Please note the difference and functions of each module.
I could see the USSR faking a landing.

I've heard theories that when people died, they just didn't report it.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#75
Apr 9, 2013
 
-The-Artist- wrote:
<quoted text>
I could see the USSR faking a landing.
I've heard theories that when people died, they just didn't report it.
Several unreported deaths of Russian cosmonauts occurred prior to the end of the Cold War. The last was apparently in the fall of 1988 and the US offered to send a shuttle (already on the pad, a few days away from scheduled launch) in an attempt to rescue the crew but Moscow declined.
As far as faking a manned lunar mission, the Russians didn't try that because they knew it would be easily exposed, as I explained above.
Thats right

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Uh...don't you think a satellite could do that for about 1% of the cost? Oh, wait...
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-...
The aliens would'nt pay to much attention to an asteroid,but they would a satellite.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Thats right wrote:
<quoted text>The aliens would'nt pay to much attention to an asteroid,but they would a satellite.
Soooo...they won't notice us placing a previously undetected asteroid in lunar orbit, huh?
Thats right

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

1

They know we are stupid okay.It's so ridiculous..they would never suspect it.Astroids orbit planets all the time.They are going to throw a small asteroid into the moons orbit.I still think we are to stupid to pull it off.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Apr 9, 2013
 
Thats right wrote:
They know we are stupid okay.It's so ridiculous..they would never suspect it.Astroids orbit planets all the time.They are going to throw a small asteroid into the moons orbit.I still think we are to stupid to pull it off.
We're going to have to use a power source and an engine to move the asteroid. You think the aliens won't detect:
a) A power signature
b) Engine thrust
c) A change in trajectory?

I have news for you...50 nations on Earth can detect those things.
Big Johnson

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>We're going to have to use a power source and an engine to move the asteroid. You think the aliens won't detect:
a) A power signature
b) Engine thrust
c) A change in trajectory?
I have news for you...50 nations on Earth can detect those things.
I do not think it is wise to disclose your top secret classified information like that.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

Big Johnson wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not think it is wise to disclose your top secret classified information like that.
Only you would think that was even amusing.
You know Johnson, you're truly witty sometimes, but lately you're like Shaq at the line. Is it a side effect of your NNRTI?
Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Apr 9, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Only you would think that was even amusing.
You know Johnson, you're truly witty sometimes, but lately you're like Shaq at the line. Is it a side effect of your NNRTI?
You are in no position to be giving anyone comedy advice, Carrot Top.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#83
Apr 9, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You are in no position to be giving anyone comedy advice, Carrot Top.
Au contraire, little girl...you simply have no concept of humor.
Duke for Mayor

Akron, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Apr 9, 2013
 
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>Au contraire, little girl...you simply have no concept of humor.
I thought it was funny when you tried to tell me that Timmy was an atheist.

That was really funny.

woof

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 61 - 80 of106
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

32 Users are viewing the Columbus Forum right now

Search the Columbus Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
What kind of God drowns 300 kids? 4 min d pantz 6
Congress Cost FYI 7 min They cannot kill a Spook 92
Happy Easter 15 min They cannot kill a Spook 1
why is chelsea clinton so ugly? 45 min xyz 28
Hillary For P R I S O N 48 min xyz 24
Hillary for President 55 min Neutral Party 15
google hates GOD 1 hr xyz 1
Bennett Smith gate stories from the victims poi... (May '13) 8 hr Oops 1,980
•••
•••
•••
Columbus Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Columbus Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Columbus People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••