Call to Arms: Texas a&M law prof says it’s time to repeal Second Amendment

Nov 16, 2013 Full story: Free Republic 44

A full-time professor on the faculty of the newly-minted Texas A&M University School of Law called for the repeal and replacement of the Second Amendment on Friday.

Full Story
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#1 Nov 16, 2013
Good luck with that one, you treasonous sycophant. That's NEVER going to happen. In fact, the amendment is going to be RESTORED to original intent.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#3 Nov 16, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
yep, and jesus is returning riding a dinosaur as well....nice to have morons like you to entertain us...
The mindless troll typed to itself in the mirror...

Since: Oct 10

Valley, AL

#5 Nov 16, 2013
The 2nd Amendment is an absolute, God given right not subject to any secular regulation. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, ever but you anti-gunners are welcome to try.
SatanlivesismyBE ATCH

Hollywood, FL

#6 Nov 16, 2013
Molon Labe Loser......look it up, then weep!
SatanlivesismyBE ATCH

Hollywood, FL

#7 Nov 16, 2013
Let's contemplate for a moment what would happen if this skank got her wish (repeal of 2A).....A few people without guns pass a law saying a bunch of people with guns now have to give them up...... Um....yeah..... and how again would that be enforced?
SatanlivesismyBE ATCH

Hollywood, FL

#8 Nov 16, 2013
...and remember the 2nd Amendment doesn't GIVE us the Right to Bear Arms. It enumerates a natural right. If I violate your Right to a fair trial you still have the Right to a fair trial......but the Right to a fair trial won't shoot you for infringing on it.....the 2A crowd would skin you and your children alive and hang your carcass from a tree. MOLON LABE, checkmate!

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#9 Nov 17, 2013
Gunluvr wrote:
The 2nd Amendment is an absolute, God given right not subject to any secular regulation. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, ever but you anti-gunners are welcome to try.
That's one of most original statements concerning our right I've seen on these or any other boards. Hat-tip to you.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#10 Nov 17, 2013
satanlives wrote:
<quoted text>
your sister, I presume? did you get her pregnant again?
http://imageshack.us/a/img88/720/fatchickpuki...
"The section which declares that no law shall restrict the right of the people to bear arms, whether in defense of themselves or of the State, was read a second time.
"Mr. RARIDEN said he would like to know from the gentlemen who reported this section whether it was the intention to permit or prohibit the wearing of concealed weapons. He preferred the language of the old Constitution. He would move to strike out the section and insert the corresponding section of the old Constitution.
"Mr.[Robert Dale] OWEN* said he would suggest to the gentleman from Wayne that if he wished to prohibit the carrying of weapons it would be necessary to change the language of the old Constitution. For if it were declared by Constitutional provision that the people should have the right to bear arms, no law of the Legislature could take away that right."

- Dec. 31, 1850, Afternoon Session.[REPORT OF THE DEBATES AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONVENTION FOR THE REVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION THE STATE OF INDIANA. 1850. VOLUME II. H. FOWLER, OFFICIAL REPORTER TO THE CONVENTION. A.H. BROWN, PRINTER TO THE CONVENTION. INDIANAPOLIS, IND 1850.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#11 Nov 17, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Dec. 31, 1850
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#12 Nov 17, 2013
Gunluvr wrote:
The 2nd Amendment is an absolute, God given right
God doesn't give rights.

God gives obligations.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#13 Nov 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
God doesn't give rights.
God gives obligations.
INCORRECT, troll:

"...That these are our grievances which we have thus laid before his majesty with that freedom of language and sentiment which becomes a free people, claiming their rights as derived from the laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief magistrate. Let those flatter, who fear: it is not an American art. To give praise where it is not due, might be well from the venal, but would ill beseem those who are asserting the rights of human nature..... The god who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them...."
- Thomas Jefferson, July 1774, "A Summary View of the Rights of British America".[The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Edited by Julian P. Boyd et al. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950.]

"Mr. Henry for it. Says that a preparation for Warr is Necessary to obtain peace--That America is not Now in a State of peace--That all the Bulwarks, of Our Safety, of Our Constitn. are thrown down, That We are Now in a State of Nature--That We ought to ask Ourselves the Question should the planns of Nonim [portatio] n & Nonexp [oratio] n fail of success--in that Case Arms are Necessary, & if then, it is Necessary Now. Arms are a Resource to which We shall be forced, a Resource afforded Us by God & Nature, & why in the Name of both are We to hesitate providing them Now whilst in Our power."

- Silas Deane's Diary,[Oct. 3, 1774].[Letters of Delegates to Congress: Volume 1 AUGUST 1774 - AUGUST 1775.](Presumably referring to Patrick Henry).

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#14 Nov 17, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam...
Back to spam-bot mode, eh loser?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#16 Nov 17, 2013
[QUOTE who="2ndAmRight"Oct. 3, 1774[/QUOTE]

Wife: Have you got anything without spam?

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#17 Nov 19, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wife: Have you got anything without spam?
Top 10 states in murder by numbers w/firearms

1. California 1,220
2. Texas 699
3. Pennsylvania 470
4. Michigan 450
5. New York 445
6. Louisiana 402
7. Illinois 377
8. Georgia 370
9. Ohio 344
10. North Carolina 335
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2011...

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#19 Nov 19, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
Top 10 states in murder by numbers w/firearms
1. California 1,220
I know you are too stupid to understand why a state that has 39 million people in it would have more murders than a state that has 600,000 in it.

I shall remind you every time you post it, Sod0Mite.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#21 Nov 19, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I know you are too stupid to understand why a state that has 39 million people in it would have more murders than a state that has 600,000 in it.
I shall remind you every time you post it, Sod0Mite.
New York?
Chicago?

You aren't that bright, are you troll? The populations equal out to almost exactly 50-50 between north and south. And the north has the higher murder rate.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#23 Nov 20, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<quoted text>
New York?
Chicago?
New Orleans?
Phoenix?
Atlanta?

Why do you suppose cities of different sizes are compared using 'per capita' dumdum?

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#24 Nov 20, 2013
2ndAmRight wrote:
<The populations equal out to almost exactly 50-50
They don't.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#25 Nov 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
They don't.
Yes, in FACT, they do.

“shall NOT be infringed”

Since: Oct 13

Phoenix

#26 Nov 20, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
New Orleans?
Phoenix?
Atlanta?
Why do you suppose cities of different sizes are compared using 'per capita' dumdum?
The FACTS don't lie,(as you do), troll:

Ready for some really ironic humor?
POPULATION BY RANK Firearm Homicides 2009-10
1. New York, N.Y. 8,143,197 NORTH 1,101
2. Los Angeles, Calif. 3,844,829 SOUTH 1,141
3. Chicago, Ill. 2,842,518 NORTH 1,139
4. Houston, Tex. 2,016,582 SOUTH 701
5. Philadelphia, Pa. 1,463,281 NORTH 729
6. Phoenix, Ariz. 1,461,575 SOUTH 331
7. San Antonio, Tex. 1,256,509 SOUTH 155
8. San Diego, Calif. 1,255,540 SOUTH 75
9. Dallas, Tex. 1,213,825 SOUTH 469
10. San Jose, Calif. 912,332 SOUTH(?) 48
http://www.infoplease.com/toptens/largestciti...

Firearm Homicides
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm62...

NORTH = 2969
SOUTH = 2920

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

University of Connecticut Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sierra Tucson Welcomes Dr. Michael V. Genovese ... Aug '14 humanSpirit 1
Canadian tour bus rolls over in NY; 1 dead Jul '14 other news checks 1
Putin Claims 'Gay Nazis' Behind Ukrainian Unrest May '14 Gremlin 2
May 20 - Tick Talk' at Belfast Free Library May '14 Jeff-LAN 1
Hillary Clinton to Talk Faith Instead of Politics Apr '14 Responsibility 3
Bit by bit, macho stereotypes lose ground in US (Feb '14) Feb '14 equalityboy81 3
UConn Student Arrested In Drug Raid On Dorm Room (Feb '14) Feb '14 More Russian Mobs... 1
•••

University of Connecticut People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••