The Beaumont City Council rejects an ordinance that would have allowed a medical-marijuana collective to operate in the city.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Inland Empire Weekly.
#1 Sep 10, 2010
Yea- after they got hit with so much negative press!! They had no problems intially approving one for they planned to rake in a $1000 a day charge from the collective, until residents said "what the????" Beaumont brags about having so much money and beating the recession, yada yada yada, yet they can't seem to pave their side of Brookside Ave near Highland Springs Ave, while the Cherry Valley half gets paved every year. I quess the poor congregation of the new church on Brookside who still take services in a tent will have to have to pony up even more donations to pay for paving Beaumont's street, while continuing to read Beaumont constant press comments on how well off they are.
Add your comments below
|Army Research Grant to Explore Communication Th... (Sep '08)||Feb 25||John Doe||12,187|
|Teen 'Burns From Inside Out' After Allergic Rea... (Dec '14)||Feb 14||Phartoom||5|
|Drill, baby, drill? Election reignites offshore...||Nov '16||Dr Wu||8|
|Court says Republican gerrymandering in Wiscons...||Nov '16||GloriusGoodness||4|
|Random citizens can contest your voting right i...||Nov '16||FireyFellow44||19|
|City Criminalizes College Parties (Jul '16)||Sep '16||David F Miller Hemet||2|
|Study: Global Greening Will Stave Off The Bad P... (Aug '16)||Aug '16||tina anne||2|
Find what you want!
Search UC Irvine Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC