Scientists calculate the carbon footp...

Scientists calculate the carbon footprint of grid-scale battery technologies

There are 1 comment on the ECNmag story from Mar 8, 2013, titled Scientists calculate the carbon footprint of grid-scale battery technologies. In it, ECNmag reports that:

Americans take electrical power for granted whenever they flip on a light switch.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at ECNmag.


Yucca Valley, CA

#1 Mar 9, 2013
"None of the conventional battery technologies featured in the study has reached that level. Lithium-ion is the best at 6,000 cycles, while lead-acid technology is at the bottom, achieving a mere 700 cycles."

Why did they leave out Altairnano's nanosafe nano-titanate battery? Who have supplied batteries for grid energy storage projects who claim a 25,000 cycle battery life at 85% of new capacity. Perhaps they didn't make the good ol' boys list? To make a broad statement of the types of energy storage studied and one was "lithium ion" to leave this technology out is suspecious.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Stanford University Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Northern states taking down vestiges of racism,... May 22 lol 1
News Market Extra: Tim Draper says Theranos founder ... May 15 Double 07 1
News Martin Luther King's speech about Vietnam War c... Apr '18 Savant 76
News Letter: Judge Aaron Persky ignored the victim's... Mar '18 Anna Cumella 1
News Stanford's Zimbardo asks: Is President Trump me... Feb '18 humanspirit 3
News Here's how to spot smartphone addiction and how... Feb '18 humanspirit 1
News This 1967 speech may have helped put a target o... Feb '18 DeDominicis 4