Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains...

Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times

There are 1 comment on the Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph story from Sep 16, 2013, titled Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times. In it, Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph reports that:

University of Maryland professor of geography and environmental systems Erle Ellis published a splendidly lucid op/ed, " Overpopulation Is Not The Problem ," in Saturday's New York Times .

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph.

Frank Abernathy

Cincinnati, OH

#1 Sep 16, 2013
Overpopulation is not the problem? So we can just keep this up indefinitely? From 6 billion to 12 billion, 24, 48, 96, over 100 billion people? What planet is this guy talking about, anyway?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Stanford University Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Deputies: Gator drags toddler into water near D... Jun 16 TerriB1 1
News Despite High Taxes, millionaires not fleeing Ny May 30 josephbarkley 28
News 7 Epic Moments When Fossil Fuel Divestment Crus... May '16 Earthling-1 2
News Vaccines contain DNA fragments from aborted hum... Apr '16 friend 7
News That controversial retracted study on gender an... Apr '16 Christshariahns 1
News Expert says renewable energy in reach Mar '16 Solarman 1
News From Little Village to Stanford: Chicago teen h... Mar '16 wild child 1
More from around the web