Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times
There are 1 comment on the Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph story from Sep 16, 2013, titled Overpopulation is Sooo Over, Explains Biologist in New York Times. In it, Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph reports that:
University of Maryland professor of geography and environmental systems Erle Ellis published a splendidly lucid op/ed, " Overpopulation Is Not The Problem ," in Saturday's New York Times .
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Quebec Chronicle-Telegraph.
#1 Sep 16, 2013
Overpopulation is not the problem? So we can just keep this up indefinitely? From 6 billion to 12 billion, 24, 48, 96, over 100 billion people? What planet is this guy talking about, anyway?
Add your comments below
|Deputies: Gator drags toddler into water near D...||Jun 16||TerriB1||1|
|Despite High Taxes, millionaires not fleeing Ny||May 30||josephbarkley||28|
|7 Epic Moments When Fossil Fuel Divestment Crus...||May '16||Earthling-1||2|
|Vaccines contain DNA fragments from aborted hum...||Apr '16||friend||7|
|That controversial retracted study on gender an...||Apr '16||Christshariahns||1|
|Expert says renewable energy in reach||Mar '16||Solarman||1|
|From Little Village to Stanford: Chicago teen h...||Mar '16||wild child||1|
Find what you want!
Search Stanford University Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC