Fingerprint Test Tells What a Person ...

Fingerprint Test Tells What a Person Has Touched

There are 3 comments on the www.nytimes.com story from Aug 8, 2008, titled Fingerprint Test Tells What a Person Has Touched. In it, www.nytimes.com reports that:

With a new analytical technique, a fingerprint can now reveal much more than the identity of a person.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.nytimes.com.

truthist

United States

#1 Aug 8, 2008
Have a finger in the pie?? They won't let this slip through their fingers.

“Women (and cats) of WoW unite!”

Since: Jul 07

San Diego, but now: The Woods

#2 Aug 8, 2008
"Smaller, cheaper, portable versions of such analyzers are probably only a couple of years away."

When they get cheap enough, parents can use them and say, "Aha! I knew you got into those cookies before dinner."

Just kidding. It sounds like a great ap.

The ethical considerations may be a mute point. If an employee has not given permission, I don't believe that any evidence of illegal drug use obtained from their personal work surfaces could be used to take action against them. However, a company that tested equipment owned by the company (same difference) and found such evidence should be able to request that employees that had access to said equipment undergo drug testing without revealing why they ordered the testing.

What really interests me are the future medical diagnostic possibilities.

“i hope we can change this!”

Since: Aug 08

usa

#3 Aug 9, 2008
TrilbyKat wrote:
"Smaller, cheaper, portable versions of such analyzers are probably only a couple of years away."
When they get cheap enough, parents can use them and say, "Aha! I knew you got into those cookies before dinner."
Just kidding. It sounds like a great ap.
The ethical considerations may be a mute point. If an employee has not given permission, I don't believe that any evidence of illegal drug use obtained from their personal work surfaces could be used to take action against them. However, a company that tested equipment owned by the company (same difference) and found such evidence should be able to request that employees that had access to said equipment undergo drug testing without revealing why they ordered the testing.
What really interests me are the future medical diagnostic possibilities.
"What really interests me are the future medical diagnostic possibilities."

I suppose they could check to see if you touched "cooties" before getting ill.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Purdue University Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Study: undocumented immigrants vs violent crime May 18 Cordwainer Trout 4
News Purdue: - Avoid' Words with - Man' in Them Mar '18 jguest 2
The word "man" Feb '18 What Did YOu Say 1
News Waterdown woman to receive national award for c... Dec '17 will USA buy pot ... 1
News Kersey joins RJL Solutions team (Nov '17) Nov '17 proofneeded 5
News Former UF provost Betty Capaldi Phillips dies (Sep '17) Sep '17 Roddy Roediger 1
News Indiana tries to help teaches meet new requirem... (Sep '17) Sep '17 proofneeded 2