Top MIT Scientist: UN Climate Report ...

Top MIT Scientist: UN Climate Report 'Hilariously' Flawed

There are 10 comments on the KTSM-AM El Paso story from Sep 30, 2013, titled Top MIT Scientist: UN Climate Report 'Hilariously' Flawed. In it, KTSM-AM El Paso reports that:

A top climate scientist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology lambasted a new report by the UN's climate bureaucracy that blamed mankind as the main cause of global warming and whitewashed the fact that there has been a hiatus in warming for the last 15 years.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at KTSM-AM El Paso.

SpaceBlues

Dallas, TX

#1 Sep 30, 2013
He probably tries to deny that he's a top climate scientist. Timing is no good for him or the rest of us.
litesong

Everett, WA

#2 Sep 30, 2013
Dr. Richard Lindzen told Climate Depot........ & nobody else, because no science avenues listen to him, after his numerous papers have been corrected, time & time again..
SpaceBlues

United States

#3 Sep 30, 2013
litesong wrote:
Dr. Richard Lindzen told Climate Depot........ & nobody else, because no science avenues listen to him, after his numerous papers have been corrected, time & time again..
Somebody should advise him to write one that is not a flawed report, LOL.

ASAP, too. He's already late.
LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#4 Sep 30, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
He probably tries to deny that he's a top climate scientist. Timing is no good for him or the rest of us.
I was going to guess Dr. Lindzen despite the claim of 'top climate scientist' but held back too long. He sure gets a lot of press for one noisy guy talking out of his ass, doesn't he?
litesong

Everett, WA

#5 Sep 30, 2013
litesong wrote:
Dr. Richard Lindzen told Climate Depot........ & nobody else, because no science avenues listen to him, after his numerous papers have been corrected, time & time again..
/////////
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
....a lot of press for one noisy guy talking out of his ass?
/////////
litesong wrote:
Is that how he does it? He's got a.......... smart ass!
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#6 Sep 30, 2013
Lindzen and Curry are a new species.. Their behavior is more theatrical than scientific, more unethical than rational, ... Their classes, I'm guessing, must be one of serial whining episodes ...
LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#7 Sep 30, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
Lindzen and Curry are a new species.. Their behavior is more theatrical than scientific, more unethical than rational,... Their classes, I'm guessing, must be one of serial whining episodes ...
Nah, That kind has been around for a long time. Just look into the 'free energy' claims.
Lindsey

Belgium

#8 Oct 1, 2013
I don't believe humans are the greatest reason of global warming. Off course there is so called consensus but it is not because 97 percent of the herd is saying humans are the cause that we don't have to listen what the other 3 percent is saying.
Keep an open mind and don't blame those who are keeping all options open.
http://www.evawaseerst.be/climatechange.htm
LessHypeMoreFact

Etobicoke, Canada

#9 Oct 1, 2013
Lindsey wrote:
I don't believe humans are the greatest reason of global warming.
Ignorance is not an argument. The facts and science say it is.
Lindsey wrote:
Off course there is so called consensus but it is not because 97 percent of the herd is saying humans are the cause that we don't have to listen what the other 3 percent is saying.
97% of the RESEARCH CLIMATE SCIENTISTS means that the theory is very convincing to people that UNDERSTAND the issue. What the 'herd' thinks (or is ignorant of) is of little relevance.
Lindsey wrote:
we don't have to listen what the other 3 percent is saying.
Of course we do. And they are regularly reviewed and rebutted whenever they put their claims to the test of science publication. Off course, the majority will ONLY publish in blogs and other un-moderated or denial friendly media.
Lindsey wrote:
Keep an open mind
An 'open mind' should not mean letting the brains leak out. An 'open mind' or 'skepticism' should be based on GOOD REASONING, which, so far, the denialists cannot come up with.
Lindsey wrote:
don't blame those who are keeping all options open.
http://www.evawaseerst.be/climatechange.htm
What options? All you are poitning to is another denialist tract that says it is based on 'belief' and a faulty comparison of CO2 levels over billions of years (with many other factors also changing). AGW is about the last HUNDRED years and the emission of major amounts of GHG which IS causing Climate Change. Over those billions of years and changes in major forces, the climate changed TOO, but that is irrelevant to the problems we face with AGW over the economic and social costs to MODERN CIVILIZATION.
SpaceBlues

Houston, TX

#10 Oct 1, 2013
LessHypeMoreFact wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah, That kind has been around for a long time. Just look into the 'free energy' claims.
You just look into relevance before you post to me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama during off-the-record speech: 'We ... Mar '18 petergriffin4potus 4
News Students chide Dartmouth for lack of faculty di... (Jun '16) Feb '18 C Kersey 2
News Koch family to open a new kind of private schoo... Feb '18 Real Science 1
News 10 African Americans named Rhodes scholars, mos... (Nov '17) Dec '17 mr gleeble 59
News Experimental defense unit funds new tech but fa... (Aug '17) Aug '17 anonymous 3
News Weather Gets Weird as Record Rainfall Follows R... (Jul '17) Jul '17 Shirvell s Shrivel 2
News Tim Cook tells grads: Tech without values is wo... (Jun '17) Jun '17 Comin round the m... 2