Sensing victory, Romney turns attenti...

Sensing victory, Romney turns attention to Obama fight

There are 41 comments on the Reuters story from Mar 30, 2012, titled Sensing victory, Romney turns attention to Obama fight. In it, Reuters reports that:

Essential tax and accounting reading: Obama wants Romney tax returns, battling over big oil breaks, Japan's mega sales tax, and more U.S. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney addresses supporters at Lawrence University during a campaign stop in Appleton, Wisconsin, March 30, 2012.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Reuters.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#1 Mar 30, 2012
I bet Romney sensed that his dog was fine on the top of his car too! LOL

Why doesn't Romney, as the Tea Party candidate, repudiate ROMNEYCARE, the mistake that led to NATIONAL ROMNEYCARE?????

“"I'm A Great American!"”

Since: Sep 08

Obama Nation! USA! USA!

#2 Mar 30, 2012
Mitt senses victory??? LOL!!! He's clinched nothing against Ron Paul, Newt, & Ricky Sanatorium.

And if he get's nominated, the Democrats will SEVERELY kick his ass...
Oboogger Must Be Crushed

Philadelphia, PA

#3 Mar 30, 2012
and caged

“Happiness comes through giving”

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#4 Mar 30, 2012
Does Mitt the visionary also sense his ultimate defeat?
Ex-GOP Con

Lyndhurst, NJ

#5 Mar 30, 2012
Obamacare vs Romneycare. Oh this should be fun!

All I know is that the economy is improving, stocks are up, and jobs are coming back.

All I know is that President Obama took an oath to the American people; Romney however signed Grover Norquist's pledge.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#6 Mar 30, 2012
Should people advocate that most every matter is by military solution?

US technology has been transferred to many countries worldwide. And in addition, the people on the planet also have well-trained technologists. So this world could have propelling effects of some serious weaponry and more than what you can think of, which could cause USA much damages and losses if USA is not careful.

However, this is not the point of subject of discussion about military technology.

Here is just to talk about the focus more on the politics and the ways for problem solving matters.
There is no question about the unaceptability of these radical Muslims and Arabs. And it is not just about the Muslims, for there are Chinese Communists going around the world and into the United States too.

What Santorum wants to do is basically using the emotions of those too extreme Christians, to come up with warfares, just like Bush calling god to do so, and so is Obama, for both are walking the path of Bush to do wars.

What this all about is, other than-from Santorum and Obama ways and positions about Iran, China, North Korea, etc., there are other ways and approach , to get things done-without going for wars if not needed , and to enlarge the focus to put Communists under review and watch (where Bush and Obama flourish and do them Chinese Communists good and favor), and to change the way of doing things, which would be completely different from standpoint of Bush acts in the past (As of Now Obama and Santorum are the same ways like Bush.)

Then there must be no more same Bush left-over businesses ---failing agenda of the past at all, so there will be NO MORE OBAMA and SANTORUM AS WELL, since they are unlikeable doing the past gone Bush's agenda (too old already) people don't want , and would be making everything very bad, and therefore they should be all gone away.

Since: Dec 07

Spring, TX

#7 Mar 30, 2012
Ex-GOP Con wrote:
Obamacare vs Romneycare. Oh this should be fun!
All I know is that the economy is improving, stocks are up, and jobs are coming back.
All I know is that President Obama took an oath to the American people; Romney however signed Grover Norquist's pledge.
Jobs are coming back mostly in the red states as we have proven to you many times, yet you repeat your garbage that it's nobama doing it. You're funny as hell and just as predictable!

Six of the ten to job creating states in the last 10 years (Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming) have been conservative strongholds for decades. Montana, though its governor and two senators are currently Democrats, has been a red state in all but one presidential election since 1972. The final three highlighted above — Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin — were previously governed by Democrats who were replaced with GOP governors this year. All three are in the early stages of what may be remarkable turnarounds.

These support good economic reports help the fed give better asset prices if those reports disappoint, 2) Mechanical reasons – performance chasing and expected fund flows into equities rather than bonds, and 3) Technical reasons that favor price momentum upwards.

You're messiah has NOTHING to do with it. Again, your not a very good liar.
Ex-GOP Con

San Jose, CA

#8 Mar 30, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
Jobs are coming back mostly in the red states as we have proven to you many times, yet you repeat your garbage that it's nobama doing it. You're funny as hell and just as predictable!
Six of the ten to job creating states in the last 10 years (Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming) have been conservative strongholds for decades. Montana, though its governor and two senators are currently Democrats, has been a red state in all but one presidential election since 1972. The final three highlighted above — Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin — were previously governed by Democrats who were replaced with GOP governors this year. All three are in the early stages of what may be remarkable turnarounds.
These support good economic reports help the fed give better asset prices if those reports disappoint, 2) Mechanical reasons – performance chasing and expected fund flows into equities rather than bonds, and 3) Technical reasons that favor price momentum upwards.
You're messiah has NOTHING to do with it. Again, your not a very good liar.
President Obama's policies are applied on a national level. Not state by state. The economic improvements should be looked at a national level which I have to keep pointing out to you. Statistics was not your strong point in school huh?
imaginaryfriend

Sterling Heights, MI

#9 Mar 30, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
Jobs are coming back mostly in the red states as we have proven to you many times, yet you repeat your garbage that it's nobama doing it. You're funny as hell and just as predictable!
Six of the ten to job creating states in the last 10 years (Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming) have been conservative strongholds for decades. Montana, though its governor and two senators are currently Democrats, has been a red state in all but one presidential election since 1972. The final three highlighted above — Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin — were previously governed by Democrats who were replaced with GOP governors this year. All three are in the early stages of what may be remarkable turnarounds.
These support good economic reports help the fed give better asset prices if those reports disappoint, 2) Mechanical reasons – performance chasing and expected fund flows into equities rather than bonds, and 3) Technical reasons that favor price momentum upwards.
You're messiah has NOTHING to do with it. Again, your not a very good liar.
Wisconsin and Michigan are recalling their horrible Koch addicted govs. Ohio put a big stop sign in front of theirs. Michigan is doing much better because Willard's advice to let Detroit's Big 3 go bankrupt was not taken, thanks to Governor Granholm and President Obama. Your gov, Perry is a retard. You probably voted for him, so, so are you.

“Kiss Me You Fool!”

Since: Jan 08

Atlanta via Brooklyn NY

#10 Mar 30, 2012
By "sensing victory" do they mean he thanks the previous primaries for shifting delegates whenever they could so the GOP powers make sure Romney is the Rom-iniee

“Kiss Me You Fool!”

Since: Jan 08

Atlanta via Brooklyn NY

#11 Mar 30, 2012
Bluebonnets-Thistle wrote:
<quoted text>
Jobs are coming back mostly in the red states as we have proven to you many times, yet you repeat your garbage that it's nobama doing it. You're funny as hell and just as predictable!
Six of the ten to job creating states in the last 10 years (Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming) have been conservative strongholds for decades. Montana, though its governor and two senators are currently Democrats, has been a red state in all but one presidential election since 1972. The final three highlighted above — Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin — were previously governed by Democrats who were replaced with GOP governors this year. All three are in the early stages of what may be remarkable turnarounds.
These support good economic reports help the fed give better asset prices if those reports disappoint, 2) Mechanical reasons – performance chasing and expected fund flows into equities rather than bonds, and 3) Technical reasons that favor price momentum upwards.
You're messiah has NOTHING to do with it. Again, your not a very good liar.
blah blah blah....fun times ahead when your Romney who was just recently PRO-CHOICE, PRO CAP and TRADE, and PRO HEALTHCARE MANDATE tries to defend his new "severely conservative" stances.

Romney's been for a pullout from Afghan and he's been for staying in Afghan.

Same flip flopping with Libya.

The Obama campaign can't wait to push the once very moderate Romney on his flips.

Even you know in your heart, Romney is just the best of the clown show we've been seeing.

Lets push for Angry Rick to win the nominee....is that your man?
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#12 Mar 30, 2012
Because the Democrats will run against Republicans by
SAYING ====>>Democrats will use everything and all as issues--- by concentrating naming and connecting Bush to point to , from WAR-MONGERING, ECONOMY, ETC.

THEN____::::::

==Republicans >>>ARGUMENT---> >>YOU DEMOCRATS (OF YOUR OWN WAR-MONGERING) ARE DOING BUSH WAR BUSINESS (for example, going by more of same Bush extension In Afghanistan, and now wanting to Iran for war or not, etc.,), so the connection and matching are you Democrats doing Bush things INSTEAD.)

==And Now Romney is a new MAN WITH new business and clean with new direction and more agenda AS BEING VERY DIFFERENT for freedom-telling saying radical ideology invading the world to destruct freedom rights, and would do supporting and enhancing rights of women, choices for all ,consumer rights, industrial production, housing ,energy formula, and more,

====Economy, they Democrats will say they save the mess from Bush period.
>>>>ARGUMENT--Demo cRats are same acts of the Bush building debts of unacceptable degree more than Bush debts , as Auto -industry profits are equal to public money giving to them (gave more than enough to get them back on their feet- equal to profits of industry.
Stock market is not the argument of economy, but the big debts, as far as the employment picture, there is net loss of jobs since Bush time, and not bad enough for so much money spent. Therefore it saved nothing, but has done further mess with large debts making with future economic uncertainty.

====So have to distance and stay away from past Bush agenda , and show nothing to do with Bush , of the past by using god to make war, etc.

====Instead, all matters finger-pointing by DemocRats to Bush, it is about BACK -TO -THEM talking about themselves instead, as they are the Bush Democrats doing Bush way, including the relationship with China, and North Korea , UN, etc., as same and adding more the same direction, and so on. Romney will tell to do things differently from Bush, while Obama is the same as Bush.

====So Romney must show new ways and positions in many issues, including illegal and border management, and cannot be doing old parts of Bush in public agenda, and let Bush stay away in private too, to make the message clear-all they say about Bush as very unpopular is all that unpopular Obama enforcing and doing them.

====So Romney should play clean image , with innovation and new sets of policies, of fresh and interesting direction, including freedom importance and foreign policy, from China under wath (different from Obama as same as Bush) to Russia, Asia, Japan, Australia, Syria, Europe, Mexico, South America, and so on, including comparing the health care of Romneycare to Obamacare dictatorship(if they don't pass Obama budget, why would they pass Obamacare?)
Responsibility

Redwood City, CA

#13 Mar 31, 2012
Ex-GOP Con wrote:
Obamacare vs Romneycare. Oh this should be fun!All I know is that the economy is improving, stocks are up, and jobs are coming back.
All I know is that President Obama took an oath to the American people; Romney however signed Grover Norquist's pledge.
Has he flipflopped on the Norquist Pledge yet?! LOLL
Makes sense

Dearborn, MI

#14 Mar 31, 2012
Responsibility wrote:
<quoted text>
Has he flipflopped on the Norquist Pledge yet?! LOLL
You must be confusing Willard "the Flip-Flopper" Romney of "NATIONAL ROMNEYCARE" with "Read my lips" Bush who is proudly endorsing him. LOL
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#15 Mar 31, 2012
==========

The anti-missile technology is now not limited to USA.

It was heard that the Russians are also getting to this sort of system of technology and this may complicate the matters.

The negotiations with the Russians about the past strategic warheads (Inter-continental ballistic missles) may even proceed to the negotiation of this sort of systems in the future , which amounts to a neutralized standpoint (a draw as even)---in other words, no one is at advantage, like being equal.) However, the Russians can get into the long range AMDS (ANTI-MISSLE DEFENSE SYSTEM), compared to the short range Patriot system.

It then becomes a political situation if the Russians can really do it in the long run, because the Russians can defend anybody on the planet they choose to, if they can make it.

And that simply says any war of USA so making would be useless if Russians so choose to defend such countries in Russia's association and linkage of its interests.

Although Russia does not have such system right now, its position and stand with other military supplies to the world, do pose for consideration aspects , in case USA wants to make war.

Through so many years of exchange and letting the Chinese Communists getting close under Bush and Obama administrations, it has resulted the ongoing space program of China, having some sort of satellite technology as well. USA should be careful about this sort of system , whether will be spied on and pirated by China (this loose logo Obama might as well give to them, and then it will be all over.)

Then it is useless to talk about Nuke,(of Iran or North Korea, or others in the every very long run ) if some world countries can also do so IN THE VERY LONG RANGE OF TIME , since modern technology is being delivered around the world and gaining ground.

Would US military and weapon technologists think that they are the only ones who are on the upper advantage as of now, when technology is being spread around the world, which can lead to the long term future as unknown?

There is just to give some indication for people to think about and ponder, as why politics and problem solving have to do about what are best ways of interests and position to partake.
There is no need to pose questions about this subject if people do not understand.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#16 Mar 31, 2012
The question will have to narrow down to :

' Who do you trust and believe in the HANDLING of national security matters, foreign policy, freedom and free choices for all, health care, and management of debts, illegals and borders, and economic and domestic policy and people rights issues '

Obama has let Communist China visitor into the Pentagon in February 2012, as the first time ever happened since his history of time----but look it was a <<<<Chinese Communist FROM A COMMUNIST COUNTRY---DO YOU KNOW THE HUGE DIFFERENCE?>>>> > into US military building of A freedom democratic country USA , and was Obama beyond crazy?

Just by looking at Obama going with Russian president and China president, on this VERY question ALONE, IT would be posed to the free world people:______

"Who would you believe and trust, Romney or Obama, to make you feel more secure and safe?"

Even a kindergarten kid can figure IT out, AS SIMPLE AS THAT !
Gravediggers

United States

#17 Mar 31, 2012
Makes sense wrote:
I bet Romney sensed that his dog was fine on the top of his car too! LOL
Why doesn't Romney, as the Tea Party candidate, repudiate ROMNEYCARE, the mistake that led to NATIONAL ROMNEYCARE?????
And good ole, Bo Obama, gets a private jet ride to meet up with the Obamas in Martha's Vineyard.

Private jets for everyone and everything!
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#18 Mar 31, 2012
It is a constitution democracy.

That is a democracy- if people have doubts of Obama's birth-place , they can throw him out of the presidency.

On matter where Obama was born, if they have doubts of him, that is good enough that he should not be president, to choose someone whom they believe born in USA with firm belief, while casting doubts of Obama's birth-place.

People don't have to see Obama's birth-certificate to do so with the conviction of such belief .

That could be also an issue in the election.
Hussian Bohemiam

Germany

#19 Mar 31, 2012
PooPoo Platter wrote:
Mitt senses victory??? LOL!!! He's clinched nothing against Ron Paul, Newt, & Ricky Sanatorium.
And if he get's nominated, the Democrats will SEVERELY kick his ass...
Actually the Democrats are kicking their own asses since realizing they confirmed an illegal who is now running the USA as a full blown dictatorship. The upcoming election is fixed but added insurance is necessary so Obama jumped on the Trayvon pity party train along with his Muslim bro's Sharpton, Jackson. and Farrakhan. Other insurance was secured via the 'green weenies' by shutting down the coal industry will will have a huge adverse effect upon electric utilities, etc. Add to this the recent executive orders put into effect eliminating the bill of rights, and ordering mandatory civil service or off to prison. Yes I'm a birther right there with bill and Hillary Clinton!!!!

“Sustainability Now!”

Since: May 08

Vadnais Heights

#22 Mar 31, 2012
Hussian Bohemiam wrote:
<quoted text>... the recent executive orders put into effect eliminating the bill of rights, and ordering mandatory civil service or off to prison....
Oh, really? Why do you suppose the Lamestream Media has ignored these rather shocking executive orders? Can you provide the dates and/or order numbers for verification?

Enquiring minds need to know!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Lawrence University Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bernie Sanders tops Hillary Clinton in Wisconsi... Apr '16 Gerald 27
News Think Trump was crude? The Founding Fathers wer... Mar '16 Go Blue Forever 1
News DMV denies drivers license to man with no hands (Aug '15) Aug '15 Joe Balls 1
News Some US colleges calling students back from Israel (Aug '14) Aug '14 ACME Rock Sales 2
News Harvard to co-create US-like competitive body i... (Feb '14) Feb '14 Hind e Ganndo 2
News White House blames 'polar vortex' on global war... (Jan '14) Jan '14 B as in B S as in S 6
News Norwood brothers help save woman's life (Aug '13) Aug '13 Buddy 3
More from around the web