I know you think you are being cute with this whole "it's over your head" crap, but the fact of the matter is this. Any one of us on this board could give you a 5 year head start of any of these topics and still whoop your ass.
Believe that if you want to, but like I stated earlier, The NERD is not giving any free handouts here, you have yet to refute that dent The NERD has put in your belief.<quoted text>
You simply aren't equipped to participate in a discussion about science because you believe in a world view that revolves around make believe concepts and not reality.
That's why you haven't presented any evidence. There can be no evidence for your imagination.
The initial URL I gave you was the link to the scientific document from a very reputable science and medicine publishing site ( NATURE.COM ). You stated it was the homepage as if you couldn't search the site and find the document yourself. Keywords like "Gorilla", "Genomics","Gen etics", "Evolution" "March 8" could take you far if you wasn't so lazy. You could easily just reference the URL I gave you and take the article number from the URL [n7388] and put it in the search field on the website and viola!<quoted text>
All you have is your misunderstanding of articles from the popular press (not even the actual scientific papers),
I know why they are doing it, I'm asking if you know why.<quoted text>
So, let's look at your premise for your argument.
You think that you know more than we do about genetics.
Therefore you are asking us why the researchers are doing the study they way they are doing it.
Then I would suggest you try and figure it out.<quoted text>
Me, I don't know why the researchers are choosing one method over another.
Once again, there is no evidence that our solar system is a good fit to host any form of life.