Who are the scientists who don't believe in global warming and why don't they?
Who are the scientist who don't believe in global warming and why don't they? The list is short but illustrious.Full Story
#1 Oct 19, 2012
It's a free planet. I don't care if there are loser scientists as well.
#2 Oct 19, 2012
In the article, 3 scientists are mentioned & not one reason dealing with GHG absorption of infra-red energy.
#3 Oct 20, 2012
Freeman Dyson: Climatology background? None.
“How far do you allow the oceans to rise before you say, This is no good?” she asked Dyson.
“When I see clear evidence of harm,” he said.
“Then it’s too late,” she replied.“Shouldn’t we not add to what nature’s doing?”
“The costs of what Gore tells us to do would be extremely large,” Dyson said.“By restricting CO2 you make life more expensive and hurt the poor. I’m concerned about the Chinese.”
He's blind to the damage (denial) and basing his opposition on a false claim (that fighting global warming will be hard on the economy). A claim that the ECONOMISTS reject. In what way is he credible on THIS topic (no matter his laurels on other issues)?
Richard Lindzen: Climatology background? Yes.
However, his writings for the political scene and his championing of the "Infrared Iris" which was roundly and solidly debunked have shown that he has his own AGENDA driven reasons to oppose AGW science. He is the modern 'Lysenko' looking for political support when the facts go against him.
A scientist that doesn't accept the data when it goes against his 'hypothesis' has lost all credibility.
“Happy, warm and comfortable”
Since: Oct 10
Mountain hideaway, SE Spain
#4 Oct 21, 2012
LessFactMoreHype: Climatology background? None.
NobodyYouEverWantToKnow: Climatology background? None.
Mr Undoubtably Spelt Fourty: Climatology background? None.
#5 Oct 21, 2012
And the dirtling none no just more useless babble. We see you forgot to take your meds today.
“Denying those who deny nature”
Since: Jun 07
#6 Oct 22, 2012
Actually Dr Dyson is just as qualified if not more so to discuss climate change as any of the other "experts". Lets not forget Fair Game's favorite web site is run by someone with a physics degree. Much of the science of climatology is also the science of physics, of mass and energy. I know LHMF and litesong do not like what he is saying but I can see many who use to believe in AGW having the same outlook.
#7 Oct 22, 2012
Maybe but the problem is you aren't qulified to have an opinion on who would be an expert or other. Now go back to school start at Pre K level and pay attention.
Add your comments below
|Korean Air 'nut rage' scandal: 5 things to know...||Dec 17||Ainu||1|
|Reading online reviews? Be careful whose advice...||Nov 26||TekSavvy||1|
|Researchers Propose Application To Bypass Inter...||Oct '14||Gerald Vonberger||1|
|Persistent Drought a Threat to Civilizations - ...||Sep '14||Jim the Hoax Denier||7|
|Guest Viewpoint: What to do about the deer?Gues...||Sep '14||conklincolt||1|
|Pro-Palestinian Students Accused of Exploiting ... (Apr '14)||Aug '14||lavon affair||25|
|Wastewater disposal wells cause destructive ear...||Jul '14||Go Blue Forever||1|
Find what you want!
Search Cornell University Forum Now
Copyright © 2014 Topix LLC