Aung San Suu Kyi Meets With Ban Ki-Mo...

Aung San Suu Kyi Meets With Ban Ki-Moon, College Students In New York

There are 3 comments on the International Business Times story from Sep 22, 2012, titled Aung San Suu Kyi Meets With Ban Ki-Moon, College Students In New York. In it, International Business Times reports that:

Aung San Suu Kyi was in New York on Saturday. On Saturday morning she met with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon and then spoke at Queens College.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at International Business Times.



#1 Sep 22, 2012
Yeah, keep up the pretences, Mrs. Michael Aris. You have met toothless non-entity Ban Ki-Moon before.
Everyone knows your hollow rhetorics. So far you have managed to fool the whole world. Your elder son Alexander wouldn't speak to you as you refused to be with your dying husband, his father.
You know, Mrs. Aris, in a dark recess of your heart you are a liar, opportunist and traitor, without any principles. You said ' If you want to leave Burma, we will give you a passport.' There was no guarantee you could come back to Burma. You know jolly Burmese junta openly said that as a daughter of Burma you could come back freely
Of course you feared you would not be let in again. That is your fear, not a fact. How you think and feel is your jurisdiction. But that is not the truth. Two different things.
BBC whitewash program accuses Senior General SawMaung of killing over 3000 people in 1988. What white lie! It was Fargaung ShuMaung who ordered butcher SeinLwin to keep the armed femonstrators. The young students of 1988 were indeed very brave.
You exploited them, having said previously that you were not interested in politics but you were fthere only to look after your dying mother Daw Khin
GHfor AungSan Oo to lrad Burma.You got to revenge AungSanOo because he disowned you for marrying Michael Aris, s man of England, the establishment of which killed your father. Watch ' Who Killed Aung San'.

Many Burmese were so ashamed of you when they heard you had married an Englishman.
Your husband worked so hard to keep you in the conciousness of the world. He was a great media strategist.
You can do nothing good for Burma.
Please make way for Aung San Oo's leadership.

Since: Aug 12

Kagoshima, Japan

#2 Sep 29, 2012
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is Japanese.

The colonial control of Korean peninsula is much more intense after World War II.

Japan's dominating strategy is very artful and insidious.


#3 Sep 30, 2012
ecatka wrote:
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is Japanese.
The colonial control of Korean peninsula is much more intense after World War II.
Japan's dominating strategy is very artful and insidious.
Maybe. But no Korean woman had betrayed Korea by marrying a Japanese man and tries to rule Korea. Get the point?
SuuKyi ARIS is doing this to Burma. Get the point?
Coloniser England had stipulated that 10 years after independence ethnic minorities could secede. What a legacy. SuuKyi's father and a few ethnic leaders signed the Panglong agreement, without plebicite. Panglong dictated that Burma must brrak up. Imagine. AungSan was 32 years old whereas Clement Attlee was 64 in 1947. Burmese had become slaves and keep their slave mentality. So some stupid Burmese started talking about self determination without inderdtanding that Panglong was meant to lead to Burma's disintegration. Unbelievable. If AungSan was alive, disintegration would not take place. So the English killed him.
Google ' Who killed Aung San?'
The English coloniser had also imported East Bengalis into Burma. They call themselves Rohingyas. The Rohingyas established a colony in s Burmese buddhist town, terrorised the Buddhist natives, raped Buddhist native women and destroyed Buddhist houses. Rohingyas are muslim. Now they are claiming Burmese citizenship.
Traitor SuuKyi, set up by English neovolonialists keep quiet about it, betraying Burmese people.
She does not want to upset her puppet masters English and Americans lest she loses their support.
She really is a traitor. Her Burmesesupporters understand only two things. Burmese army had abused the people. Burmese army had made Burma poor. They completely failed to understand it was not the army but the communist ideology, Panglong and the top leaders of the army were the roots of all Burma's problem. So they hate the army and support the traitor SuuKyi.
Is that clear?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

City University of New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News CCNY-UTEP partner to produce next generation La... May 26 Food farts 4
News Discrimination linked to greater probability of... Apr '17 Spotted Girl 2
News Gay Men Less Likely to Have Safe Sex Now: Survey Mar '17 Dandy Randy 18
News Few poor or minority patients in New York City'... Feb '17 lol 1
News Free tuition doesn't mean free college, student... Feb '17 lol 1
News new Trump Cabinet pick paid by a cult-likea Ira... Feb '17 gwww 4
News Governor calls for free tuition at New York pub... Jan '17 Let Freedom Ring 4
More from around the web