Obama Seeks To Define Romney As Out Of Touch

When President Barack Obama criticized Mitt Romney by name this week for embracing a controversial Republican budget proposal, he worded his attack carefully and with bite. Full Story

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#1 Apr 8, 2012
Ok .... Now let's define Barack Obama.

BARACK OBAMA defined as: The Unknown Islamic Presidential Puppet ( http://www.cross.tv/66175 ) who has allowed Islamic Extremists to infiltrate our US Government ( http://www.cross.tv/61506 ) in order to promote policies conducive for making America Sharia Law Compliant ( http://www.cross.tv/45820 ), and who has allowed Socialists to Bankrupt and Destroy the US Economy to weaken America in every way ( http://youtu.be/AGTuHf9c_8M ) while making the American so distracted and divided that the US voters are not even aware when he wages Black Genocide in America ( http://www.cross.tv/80501 ), or when he gives 1.5 Billion Dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood without congressional Approval ( http://youtu.be/l2S1mJAxMzA ), or when he sets the stage to rig the US Elections in November by using foreign companies outside America to count all our votes ( http://youtu.be/dmJtaOO2etc ).

Today, Obama Says His Woman Voters are Too "Stupid and Weak" to Fend for Themselves
http://youtu.be/9Cai3Go7Xu4

“Work hard at work worth doing.”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#2 Apr 8, 2012
This coming from the king of foodstamps, and redistribution of wealth. He wants people to be dependant upon the government in order to more easily manipulate them, allowing the government to dictate when they eat, what they should eat, how many kids they should have and so on. If he's elected again, the personal freedoms that we all enjoyed, will be fewer and fewer. People need to open their eyes instead of their hands looking for hand-outs, to wake up out of their entitlement induced comas...America is going down the tubes, and the wolves are in place, ready to pick our bones.
Really

Kansas City, MO

#3 Apr 8, 2012
Obama much prefers to give away the farm and push us into bankruptcy. No thanks!
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#4 Apr 8, 2012
Obama is the person who is really out of touch of the reality and dioes not know what is all that about most everything..

Do people think the election is all or in part about the economy?
How do you come up with that? What you are saying is that the job situations are good, then there is nothing else that matters at all. The election is in part about economic matters , not as exactly by using the label --the economy

The following are fundamental matters that are main issues in the election.

Obama had let the VP visitor (from whoever initiation is not known) from Communist China into the Pentagon---that means it is all over for Obama regardless the conditions of the economy. It means that there are many other matters, not just about foreign policy (it is another problem concerning what was heard about what he told the Russian president in South Korea), other matters such as womenís issues, health care, freedom rights, privacy , immigration , borders---all are in problematic messes . Does that mean that people will have to forget the messes by looking at just the economy?

But Obama ran the economy in the wrong direction because he increased too huge debts.
Unlike Bush, the economy should have been focused on not escalating debts, not keeping on borrowing and printing money, and cutting trade debts to China instead (too large and stunning), created by Bush, which is shocking.

WHEN SOME PARTS OF ELECTION ARE ABOUT the economy, they are the economic issues and matters which are stated as above, not based on employment picture and stock market for reviewing and assessing purpose..

It is not all that just about economy issues, for national security, the safety of freedom, and US stage around the world, immigration policy and many other matters are vitally important.

Since the world is moving up with people gaining technology,, USA needs to face the competition, and come up with a set of crucial policy---such as Communists ( like from China) cannot come to USA for schooling---and there needs not ask why---simply Communists are Communists and that is the basic rule-of-thumb doctrine of stand.
If people want students, the whole world has more than enough people you need as proper students, but not Communists. That is all to it---because USA is a FREEDOM country as FREEDOM CULTURE PEOPLE, whereas must stand to deter and reject Communists, to stand for freedom cultures positions all the way---would have to do that from now on, as not according to the ways of Obama and Bush at all.

How does Obama come up with this scheme that his Obamacare is Mass. Care?
Does he mean he can admire and praise Romney handling the health care business that he has to use it? Obama, you donít have to do that from your admiration, Romney is going to run the whole country , including you and the health care, which is not the way as you think.
But pointing to Romney ís health care issue ( when saying molding into it, and yet criticizing the-it, but it is not really it of Romney way as a fact), does pose serious problems of Obamaís mind.

Obama people have serious problems in their thinking---that means these are non-talented people with no ability around, who cannot distinguish and figure out the basics and natures. Then they will pull down US and general society, making US not being able to compete. US needs bright and talented people to shape up the middle class and bring up the country and with better education. Instead of giving opportunities to Communists ( e.g., China), try to give your people a chance, including better Universities to be reserved for your own people.

US does have to shape up and get in shape to move on without Obama as A-MUST anymore .
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#5 Apr 8, 2012
Obama is the person who is really out of touch with the reality and does not know what is all that about most everything.

Do people think the election is all or in part about the economy?
How do you come up with that? What you are saying is that the job situations are good, then there is nothing else that matters at all. The election is in part about economic matters , not as exactly by using the label --the economy

The following are fundamental matters that are main issues in the election.

Obama had let the VP visitor (from whoever initiation is not known) from Communist China into the Pentagon---that means it is all over for Obama regardless the conditions of the economy. It means that there are many other matters, not just about foreign policy (it is another problem concerning what was heard about what he told the Russian president in South Korea), other matters such as womenís issues, health care, freedom rights, privacy , immigration , borders---all are in problematic messes . Does that mean that people will have to forget the messes by looking at just the economy?

But Obama ran the economy in the wrong direction because he increased too huge debts.
Unlike Bush, the economy should have been focused on not escalating debts, not keeping on borrowing and printing money, and cutting trade debts to China instead (too large and stunning), created by Bush, which is shocking.

WHEN SOME PARTS OF ELECTION ARE ABOUT the economy, they are the economic issues and matters which are stated as above, not based on employment picture and stock market for reviewing and assessing purpose..

It is not all that just about economy issues, for national security, the safety of freedom, and US stage around the world, immigration policy and many other matters are vitally important.

Since the world is moving up with people gaining technology,, USA needs to face the competition, and come up with a set of crucial policy---such as Communists ( like from China) cannot come to USA for schooling---and there needs not ask why---simply Communists are Communists and that is the basic rule-of-thumb doctrine of stand.
If people want students, the whole world has more than enough people you need as proper students, but not Communists. That is all to it---because USA is a FREEDOM country as FREEDOM CULTURE PEOPLE, whereas must stand to deter and reject Communists, to stand for freedom cultures positions all the way---would have to do that from now on, as not according to the ways of Obama and Bush at all.

How does Obama come up with this scheme that his Obamacare is Mass. Care?
Does he mean he can admire and praise Romney handling the health care business that he has to use it? Obama, you donít have to do that from your admiration, Romney is going to run the whole country , including you and the health care, which is not the way as you think.
But pointing to Romney ís health care issue ( when saying molding into it, and yet criticizing the-it, but it is not really it of Romney way as a fact), does pose serious problems of Obamaís mind.

Obama people have serious problems in their thinking---that means these are non-talented people with no ability around, who cannot distinguish and figure out the basics and natures. Then they will pull down US and general society, making US not being able to compete. US needs bright and talented people to shape up the middle class and bring up the country and with better education. Instead of giving opportunities to Communists ( e.g., China), try to give your people a chance, including better Universities to be reserved for your own people.

US does have to shape up and get in shape to move on without Obama as A-MUST anymore .

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#6 Apr 8, 2012
teddyr4me wrote:
This coming from the king of foodstamps, and redistribution of wealth. He wants people to be dependant upon the government in order to more easily manipulate them, allowing the government to dictate when they eat, what they should eat, how many kids they should have and so on. If he's elected again, the personal freedoms that we all enjoyed, will be fewer and fewer. People need to open their eyes instead of their hands looking for hand-outs, to wake up out of their entitlement induced comas...America is going down the tubes, and the wolves are in place, ready to pick our bones.
Yep but hey we'll all be one happy world under the New World Order...

“Work hard at work worth doing.”

Since: Apr 11

Location hidden

#7 Apr 8, 2012
Publius51 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep but hey we'll all be one happy world under the New World Order...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jq_W1DvnJ_oXX
Human nature dictates that the happiness would be fleeting as people covet what their neighbors have and do.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

City University of New York Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Sen. Warren: The economy works for billionaires Sep 8 Lawrence Wolf 14
Immigrants hope President Obama will end deport... Sep 4 wild child 12
Drug war critics take in state of Santa Cruz po... Aug '14 ANON 1
Justifying wartime atrocities alters memories May '14 humanSpirit 1
ELECTION 2014: Liberty Grove Town Board: Three ... Mar '14 Bob Gorevan 1
Some question Sheryl Sandberg's Ban Bossy campaign (Mar '14) Mar '14 Fundies R Mentall... 1
Jewish Latin American Writers Featured in Sympo... (Mar '14) Mar '14 WE JUST DONT CARE 3
•••

City University of New York People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••