Fossils of 'separate species' found

Fossils of 'separate species' found

There are 75 comments on the www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk story from Mar 14, 2012, titled Fossils of 'separate species' found. In it, www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk reports that:

Artist's reconstruction of a mystery extinct human whose fossils were found in two caves in China A separate species of human distinct from our own may have lived in China as recently as 11,500 years ago, scientists believe.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Since: Oct 11

Dover, DE

#64 Mar 16, 2012
Eddie wrote:
<quoted text>So does your arse.
You bumb bloke are the British word for cigarette!
Celtic Bard

Camberwell, Australia

#65 Mar 16, 2012
Australian Bigot wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the out of Africa theory was cooked up to make us think we're all the same, so the governments are free to import huge numbers of monkeys to work for no pay and keep growth on the up so big business gets more money while we have to put up with the ever increasing demanding whinging imports.
Gosh I was hoping for a better comment than this, I was obviously wrong?

Oh here is something for you and Plawawawawa to reconsider fool thinking about "O.O.A." theory. At least the researchers have considerable Kudos.

http://www.livescience.com/17248-arabian-arti...

Since: Apr 11

Roma, QLD

#66 Mar 16, 2012
Celtic Bard wrote:
<quoted text>
Gosh I was hoping for a better comment than this, I was obviously wrong?
Oh here is something for you and Plawawawawa to reconsider fool thinking about "O.O.A." theory. At least the researchers have considerable Kudos.
http://www.livescience.com/17248-arabian-arti...
Meh, we don't know every little detail of history and never can so I'm going to leave my opinion on this flapping like a tit in the breeze.
Celtic Bard

Camberwell, Australia

#67 Mar 17, 2012
Australian Bigot wrote:
<quoted text>
Meh, we don't know every little detail of history and never can so I'm going to leave my opinion on this flapping like a tit in the breeze.
Oh well :(

Happy Pat's :)
Celtic Bard

Camberwell, Australia

#68 Mar 17, 2012
Palawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What a load of crap, every species has a specific DNA association, Kangaroo's have no association with humans and vice versa. The unique qualities of the planet make it logical that DNA would be similar in some circumstances, just like blood and skin is common but differs between species. Crawl back into your Bible or koran wanker, dummy seems to be your middle name.
Dummy without linking DNA, mungo people can't be related to the out of Africa myth.
Problem with Mungo man, Moron (Got a nice ring to it doesn't it?) Is not only what precedes him / her on an evolutionary scale, but what happen after. That is: His DNA has not contributed to any thing...a genetic dead end. Makes it enormously difficult to chase ghosts isn't it idiot?
Secondly, because your call is that it (Mungo Man) has no DNA specific information associated with africa, this does not mean its DNA is not categorically associated with nubian or other material from Arabia..refer to previous links, I have bothered to supply which you haven't read.

You are a FXXXKING BIGOT.
LMR

Moonee Ponds, Australia

#69 Mar 18, 2012
Palawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Lucy a 3 million old hominid. Ardi a more than 4 million year old hominid. So no reason why there were hominids weren't around in Aus or Asia. No one has done much anthropological work in this country, they seem to want to believe it was empty prior to current indigenous. Just as they classed it a an unoccupied continent when the god cult invaded.
In the case of Mungo man didn't the Aboriginal community (or at least that what's his name) prevent further research?

Since: Aug 09

Location hidden

#70 Mar 18, 2012
LMR wrote:
<quoted text>
In the case of Mungo man didn't the Aboriginal community (or at least that what's his name) prevent further research?
Don't know where you got that from, from what I know, they are all for investigating and discovering the dream time. All they ask is for the research to respect the remains of the culture.

I've been to the area and will be there again in the next couple of months, there have been some more discoveries. The archaeologists and anthropologists involved want to talk about the way they should go about their work, so as not the offend anyone living or dead.

In my understanding, indigenous people are all for finding out, all they ask is for proper reverence and care in the investigations. Don't see that as unreasonable, to my mind it should be the first consideration in evolutionary investigation.
ming shing ping

Hornsby, Australia

#71 Mar 18, 2012
chinks ate this fossil people, chinks eat every thing grows and everything moves

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#72 Mar 18, 2012
Eddie - that wasn't very nice. What Steev said is correct.
When I crossed the Mexican border once, I was advised to NOT say American when asked my nationality, because South Americans are also Americans.
Canadians are also NORTH Americans.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#73 Mar 18, 2012
And Mexicans are also NORTH
Americans..........

Since: Apr 11

Roma, QLD

#74 Mar 18, 2012
quilterqueen wrote:
And Mexicans are also NORTH
Americans..........
Central, the Mexica tribe is from central America, the Mexico that was in north America was inheritance from the Spanish Empire
Eddie

Colchester, UK

#75 Mar 18, 2012
quilterqueen wrote:
Eddie - that wasn't very nice.
I don't care. Have you got massive asteroids as well?
Celtic Bard

Camberwell, Australia

#76 Mar 19, 2012
Palawaaanka said:

Absolute bullshit, Mungo people prove that categorically wrong, as does the new red deer people. Do a bit of recent study moron, instead of relying on your primitive ideological claims that keep your head stuck in the sands of the past.

***Celtic Bard repeats again:
Look stop spreading deceit and lies. The mungo man is a genetic DEAD END.
Who cares where it came from? It still may have come from Arabia (LOL)
Australia and Asia does not have very ancient fossils (Primate) like Africa / Arabia...Get over it. If Australia / Asia did, different story.

Refer back to my previous posts and those scientists have much greater kudos than Thorne and the other local 2nd rate "Scientists". Why?
Because the accuracy of Australian methodologies are highly doubted by the english and germans..(I would trust the European scientific methodology more...pretty obvious why).

The red deer people are not considered to be a new or different species of human. Your wrong yet again, dill.

So will you get it right before spreading complete wishful thinking and fairy tales. Humans did not happen from within Australia, unlike Africa / Arabia.
LMR

Moonee Ponds, Australia

#77 Mar 19, 2012
Palawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't know where you got that from, from what I know, they are all for investigating and discovering the dream time. All they ask is for the research to respect the remains of the culture.
"...The bones were unconditionally repatriated to the indigenous tribes of Southeastern Australia (the Paakantji, the Mathi Mathi, and the Ngiyampaa) in 1992. LM1 had become a symbol of the long Aboriginal occupation in Australia, and an important icon for both archaeologists and indigenous Australians. LM1 is now in a locked vault at the Mungo National Park exhibition center. The vault has a double lock and can only be opened if two keys are used. One key is controlled by archaeologists, the other by the local indigenous peoples."
Celtic Bard

Camberwell, Australia

#79 Mar 20, 2012
Palawaaanka said:

Absolute bullshit, Mungo people prove that categorically wrong, as does the new red deer people. Do a bit of recent study moron, instead of relying on your primitive ideological claims that keep your head stuck in the sands of the past.

***Celtic Bard repeats again:
Look stop spreading deceit and lies. The mungo man is a genetic DEAD END.
Who cares where it came from? It still may have come from Arabia (LOL)
Australia and Asia does not have very ancient fossils (Primate) like Africa / Arabia...Get over it. If Australia / Asia did, different story.

Refer back to my previous posts and those scientists have much greater kudos than Thorne and the other local 2nd rate "Scientists". Why?
Because the accuracy of Australian methodologies are highly doubted by the english and germans..(I would trust the European scientific methodology more...pretty obvious why).

The red deer people are not considered to be a new or different species of human. Your wrong yet again, dill.

So will you get it right before spreading complete wishful thinking and fairy tales. Humans did not happen from within Australia, unlike Africa / Arabia.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Yunnan, China Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Female flight attendants forced into overhead b... (Oct '15) Oct '15 DILF 16
News 'Masturbation Will Lead to Homosexuality': Chin... (Apr '15) May '15 Gremlin 18
News China investigating police shooting of man at t... (May '15) May '15 Ferguson 1
News China Travelers Open Emergency Exits to Protest... (Jan '15) Jan '15 Fundiementally ill 8
News Spotlight on ethnic China in Dynamic Yunnan show (Dec '14) Dec '14 Wun Hhung Low 3
News China destroys the ancient Buddhist symbols of ... (Dec '13) Nov '14 Friend of all 16
News Top academic posts are too precious to give up (Oct '14) Oct '14 cheapimport 1
More from around the web