Comments
15,621 - 15,640 of 30,456 Comments Last updated 22 min ago
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17051
Jan 1, 2013
 
This one is just for you KKK, I mean XXX.

http://blackskiclubs.com/

http://nbs.org/

Simply incredible.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17052
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got to be kidding me. Snow skis? Racist? You really believe that black people don't ski? What about swimming pools? Can they swim? You may be the single most racist person I have run into and I knew the Grand Dragon of Ohio's KKK.
And I thank you for making my point.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17053
Jan 1, 2013
 
tranpsosition wrote:
Am I the only person here who actually goes to salons?
How does everyone think tanning is only for white folks?!
Why not ask the better question which is out of all the things to tax, why tanning salons? Can any liberal come up with the logic behind that?
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17054
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
It's very difficult for liberals to answer that question honestly. If they did, they would realize how absurd their support for the Democrat party really is. So I'll answer for them.
Although there are many differences, in short, the conservatives believe in treating all people the same whereas liberals are more divide and conquer. Liberals believe in dividing Americans and make one group the enemy and the other their friends: gay vs straight, black vs white, rich vs poor, smokers vs non-smokers, women vs men and so on.
Conservaties believe if we need a federal tax rate of 10%, then the poor should pay 10%, the middle-class pay 10% and the wealthy pay 10%. We know that will never happen, but it's the philosophy that I'm pointing out.
If a murderer kills somebody in your family, then it doesn't matter if they lost their life because they were gay, Mexican or black. Murder is murder, and all murderers get the same trial.
Conservatives believe the solution to our social inequity is to bring the people at the bottom-up whereas liberals believe the solution is bringing the people at the top-down. We believe hard work and responsibility should be rewarded. They believe no work and irresponsibility be rewarded. Hard work and responsibility should be penalized.
Conservatives believe we are all free individuals with the right to go as far or as short as you desire. Liberals believe our country is one big commune and that some go out and get food and some don't,but no matter what, it all gets thrown in a pot and then divided equally.
That's the difference between conservatives and liberals.
You would be much better served worrying about the twisted thoughts in your head than trying to explain what you think is going on in other's heads.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17055
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not ask the better question which is out of all the things to tax, why tanning salons? Can any liberal come up with the logic behind that?
maybe a 40% tax on high top sneakers is in order?
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17056
Jan 1, 2013
 
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Uh, Pops. You brought it up. It is strange to bring things up and then declare they have no relevance.
What I brought up has Relavence, your response does not. It ignores the point & the facts.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17057
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
maybe a 40% tax on high top sneakers is in order?
Exactly. Far leftists like Che Che only see the world in one way--the liberal way. They can't put the shoe on the other foot and then ask how they feel about something. It's impossible when you're that far gone.

So lets say that we had a white President with a suspected racist in a key position who placed a tax on basketballs. Che Che would be the first here to scream racism. And if we pointed out that white people play basketball too, it would fall on deaf ears and he would continue to scream racism.

This is the party that includes members who frequently hinted or openly said that if you disagree with DumBama, it's because of race. The very same people who claim that harsher prison sentences for crack users than cocaine users is racist. What? White people don't use crack?

See what I mean? But a tax on tanning salons or skis racist? How could anybody think that way? LOL!
titonton divaunte pants

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17058
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you have a conspiracy to expose?
Check the ceiling fixture in the kitchen.
woof
yeah. But its been in the news for almost a year. 7trillion given out in secret loans uncovered by an audit on the fed and using FOIA. At zero percent interest.
" To place $7 trillion into perspective, remember that GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion. The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is "only" $14.5 trillion. The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is "only" $3.5 trillion. Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill: There was no debate about whether $7,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world."

"This is a clear case of socialism for the ri
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17059
Jan 1, 2013
 
titonton divaunte pants

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17061
Jan 1, 2013
 
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't you have a conspiracy to expose?
Check the ceiling fixture in the kitchen.
woof
I told you your light bulb is probably out. Check that first and if that's not it , post back to me.
Narcissism amoung males until 1970 huh? Nice to see you cows at least find it liberating. George cloony still isn't going to come along though, so don't get your hopes up.
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17062
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not ask the better question which is out of all the things to tax, why tanning salons? Can any liberal come up with the logic behind that?
A. Using one is not a necessity, its an activity driven by vanity.

B. Using one is is unhealthy, and raises health care costs over time with increasing use.

C. Because its not a necessity, its an activity almost exclusively engaged in by those with expendable income.

D. The people who would oppose the tax are not likely to effectively organize to achieve defeating its passage in the legislature.

See how easy that is?

woof
titonton divaunte pants

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17063
Jan 1, 2013
 
tranpsosition wrote:
Am I the only person here who actually goes to salons?
How does everyone think tanning is only for white folks?!
LOL! At least you have a sense of humor..

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17064
Jan 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not ask the better question which is out of all the things to tax, why tanning salons? Can any liberal come up with the logic behind that?
It seems to have been placed as a deterrent to consuming a dangerous product while working to offset some of the healthcare costs associated with it. It's a fairly common practice with items like alcohol, tobacco, recreational drugs where legal and etc.

The two stated goals of the tax are to reduce the use of tanning services due to the associated rise in cancer risks and to offset some of the costs of the affordable care act.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17065
Jan 1, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Far leftists like Che Che only see the world in one way--the liberal way. They can't put the shoe on the other foot and then ask how they feel about something. It's impossible when you're that far gone.
So lets say that we had a white President with a suspected racist in a key position who placed a tax on basketballs. Che Che would be the first here to scream racism. And if we pointed out that white people play basketball too, it would fall on deaf ears and he would continue to scream racism.
This is the party that includes members who frequently hinted or openly said that if you disagree with DumBama, it's because of race. The very same people who claim that harsher prison sentences for crack users than cocaine users is racist. What? White people don't use crack?
See what I mean? But a tax on tanning salons or skis racist? How could anybody think that way? LOL!
It is amazing that you believe you have the ability to speak for other people.
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17066
Jan 1, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly. Far leftists like Che Che only see the world in one way--the liberal way. They can't put the shoe on the other foot and then ask how they feel about something. It's impossible when you're that far gone.
So lets say that we had a white President with a suspected racist in a key position who placed a tax on basketballs. Che Che would be the first here to scream racism. And if we pointed out that white people play basketball too, it would fall on deaf ears and he would continue to scream racism.
This is the party that includes members who frequently hinted or openly said that if you disagree with DumBama, it's because of race. The very same people who claim that harsher prison sentences for crack users than cocaine users is racist. What? White people don't use crack?
See what I mean? But a tax on tanning salons or skis racist? How could anybody think that way? LOL!
Ummmm..yes Virginia...since its invention, crack cocaine has always been more popular in urban areas, specifically because of its low cost. The disparities in sentencing impacted those using crack rather than powder: mostly poor, minorities in urban areas. This isn't mere speculation...its fact.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows...

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows...

woof
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17067
Jan 1, 2013
 
tranpsosition wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems to have been placed as a deterrent to consuming a dangerous product while working to offset some of the healthcare costs associated with it. It's a fairly common practice with items like alcohol, tobacco, recreational drugs where legal and etc.
The two stated goals of the tax are to reduce the use of tanning services due to the associated rise in cancer risks and to offset some of the costs of the affordable care act.
Sounds like a lot of bull to me. It may cause skin cancer, but so can the natural sun. Why didn't they put a tax on beaches?

WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?

Long-term exposure to artificial sources of ultraviolet rays like tanning beds (or to the sun's natural rays) increases both men and women's risk of developing skin cancer. In addition, exposure to tanning salon rays increases damage caused by sunlight because ultraviolet light actually thins the skin, making it less able to heal. Women who use tanning beds more than once a month are 55 percent more likely to develop malignant melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.

According to the National Cancer Institute, more than one million people are diagnosed with non-melanoma skin cancer in the United States every year. In fact, non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the country. Forty to 50 percent of Americans who live to age 65 will have this form of skin cancer at least once. These are startling statistics for a cancer that can, for the most part, be prevented.

WHO IS AT RISK?

Almost everyone who frequents a tanning salon or exposes themselves to the sun is putting themselves at risk for skin cancer. The risk is greatest for people with fair skin; blonde, red, or light hair; and blue, green, or gray eyes. Artificial tanning can also be more dangerous for those who burn easily, have already been treated for skin cancer, or have a family member who has had skin cancer. In addition, women have a higher risk of contracting skin cancer on their legs, and men have a higher risk of getting it on their backs.

http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/entertainmen...
Duke for Mayor

Canton, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17068
Jan 1, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like a lot of bull to me. It may cause skin cancer, but so can the natural sun. Why didn't they put a tax on beaches?
WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
Long-term exposure to artificial sources of ultraviolet rays like tanning beds (or to the sun's natural rays) increases both men and women's risk of developing skin cancer. In addition, exposure to tanning salon rays increases damage caused by sunlight because ultraviolet light actually thins the skin, making it less able to heal. Women who use tanning beds more than once a month are 55 percent more likely to develop malignant melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.
According to the National Cancer Institute, more than one million people are diagnosed with non-melanoma skin cancer in the United States every year. In fact, non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the country. Forty to 50 percent of Americans who live to age 65 will have this form of skin cancer at least once. These are startling statistics for a cancer that can, for the most part, be prevented.
WHO IS AT RISK?
Almost everyone who frequents a tanning salon or exposes themselves to the sun is putting themselves at risk for skin cancer. The risk is greatest for people with fair skin; blonde, red, or light hair; and blue, green, or gray eyes. Artificial tanning can also be more dangerous for those who burn easily, have already been treated for skin cancer, or have a family member who has had skin cancer. In addition, women have a higher risk of contracting skin cancer on their legs, and men have a higher risk of getting it on their backs.
http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/entertainmen...
You really are dense, aren't you?

woof

“Meh.”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17069
Jan 1, 2013
 
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like a lot of bull to me. It may cause skin cancer, but so can the natural sun. Why didn't they put a tax on beaches?
WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?
Long-term exposure to artificial sources of ultraviolet rays like tanning beds (or to the sun's natural rays) increases both men and women's risk of developing skin cancer. In addition, exposure to tanning salon rays increases damage caused by sunlight because ultraviolet light actually thins the skin, making it less able to heal. Women who use tanning beds more than once a month are 55 percent more likely to develop malignant melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer.
According to the National Cancer Institute, more than one million people are diagnosed with non-melanoma skin cancer in the United States every year. In fact, non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the country. Forty to 50 percent of Americans who live to age 65 will have this form of skin cancer at least once. These are startling statistics for a cancer that can, for the most part, be prevented.
WHO IS AT RISK?
Almost everyone who frequents a tanning salon or exposes themselves to the sun is putting themselves at risk for skin cancer. The risk is greatest for people with fair skin; blonde, red, or light hair; and blue, green, or gray eyes. Artificial tanning can also be more dangerous for those who burn easily, have already been treated for skin cancer, or have a family member who has had skin cancer. In addition, women have a higher risk of contracting skin cancer on their legs, and men have a higher risk of getting it on their backs.
http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/entertainmen...
Because beaches aren't a pay per use, consumable vanity product?

This seems fairly easy to understand.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17071
Jan 1, 2013
 
Go Away Che wrote:
BTW, you can get your own Mensa card. Just do the following:
"Membership of Mensa is open to persons who have attained a score within the upper two percent of the general population on an approved intelligence test that has been properly administered and supervised."
You forgot "Pay the money"
They only require a 140 IQ, XX. That is not a genius. Oh, and pay the money. ;-)

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17072
Jan 1, 2013
 
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
A. Using one is not a necessity, its an activity driven by vanity.
B. Using one is is unhealthy, and raises health care costs over time with increasing use.
C. Because its not a necessity, its an activity almost exclusively engaged in by those with expendable income.
D. The people who would oppose the tax are not likely to effectively organize to achieve defeating its passage in the legislature.
See how easy that is?
woof
Yep. Like Smoking, XX.
Woof, woof.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cleveland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 1 hr Aryan Barbarian 18,831
The Enduring Mystery Of Beverly Jarosz (Feb '08) 5 hr PRIVATE 1,004
news Tue admirer 1
Was Dumb fired from Rovers Morning Glory Mon No End 18
where can u find dog food in cleveland? Aug 25 type username here 2
Creationism coming to Ohio classrooms? Not with... Aug 24 TedHOhio 6
Review: Amarico Fence Aug 22 Jimmy jones 1
•••
•••
•••

Cleveland Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Cleveland People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Cleveland News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Cleveland
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••