xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#15105 Dec 9, 2012
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
My country is a better place today than it was four years ago.
Tell this to your wife and daughters: "Equal pay legislation only forces companies to pay the same money to less productive workers. No advantage to the country there. If anything, it will only make it more likely for a company to leave the states if they are on the fence about it." You prove yourself to be more of an asshole every day you post here.
Do Women Earn Less than Men?

Another contemporary economic myth is that women make 75 cents for every dollar men make because they’re discriminated against in labor markets. Like other myths, this does have a kernel of truth to it. So for example, if you add up all the incomes of women and divide by the number of women in the labor force and then do the same thing for men, what you’ll find is, on average, women do make about 75% of what men do.

What’s happening here is not discrimination in the labor market, but differences in the choices that men and women make (about investing in their knowledge, their education, their skills, and their job experiences) that lead to them getting paid different salaries.

See video at: http://www.learnliberty.org/content/do-women-...

And learn something for a change ASSHOLE!
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#15106 Dec 9, 2012
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>actually they do provide use value retail outlets provides a place to sell the Products that have use value and Commucations have use value because it allow wealth creaters to communicate with supplier, shippers & retail outlets and restaurants provide use value of feeding the masses.
Indy,I know all of that, of course.

Now substitute the word "government", and maybe these dolts on here will figure out why government spending on things like, water ans sewer systems,sanitation services, street repairs, construction and plowing, courts and courthouses, health departments, zoning offices, police, fire, and emergency services, public schools, dog catchers (don't listen Duke), jails, prisons, and detention centers, representative governmental offices, etc, and on, and on...is included in the GDP.

woof

woof
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#15107 Dec 9, 2012
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
here is good example of what type of behavior the UAW favors, supports & promotes but I know I wont drive or buy a FIAT or Chrysler Vehicle beside proof that the UAW is not thinking about workplace or Public safety of their vehicles, just a strike against the UAW who got bailout with taxpayer money besides proves the need for RTW for employees that dont wish to financially support a union that upholds behavior like that at the workplace.
Chrysler Auto Workers fired after Wolchek investigation are back on the job
http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/20292017/ch...
Chrysler workers exposed smoking pot, drinking on lunch breaks return to jobs
http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2...
One of the reasons I drive Japanese today is because of my dozens of experiences delivering to the Auto plants in Ohio. Worthless F's.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#15108 Dec 9, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Think about it this way.
Perhaps your state and local governments aren't charging enough for their snowplowing services.
Perhaps they should raise your taxes so that their revenues generate enough money not only to pay for labor, expenses, and administration, but also to produce a small profit for the government.
Would shaking things up like that make you so happy and pleased...you know, bringing those public employees into your mythical magical world of " capitalism for profit"?
woof
Profit and government are two words that never go together. Profit and private sector? Yes, then we can use the word profit.

And no, I don't drive a box truck. I'm a tractor-trailor driver.
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#15109 Dec 9, 2012
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
here is good example of what type of behavior the UAW favors, supports & promotes but I know I wont drive or buy a FIAT or Chrysler Vehicle beside proof that the UAW is not thinking about workplace or Public safety of their vehicles, just a strike against the UAW who got bailout with taxpayer money besides proves the need for RTW for employees that dont wish to financially support a union that upholds behavior like that at the workplace.
Chrysler Auto Workers fired after Wolchek investigation are back on the job
http://www.myfoxdetroit.com/story/20292017/ch...
Chrysler workers exposed smoking pot, drinking on lunch breaks return to jobs
http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2...
Except, of course, those precious RTW employees would use the same grievance procedure to try to keep their jobs should they be fired.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#15110 Dec 9, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Profit and government are two words that never go together. Profit and private sector? Yes, then we can use the word profit.
And no, I don't drive a box truck. I'm a tractor-trailor driver.
My My My, getting a little highbrow on your box truck brethren, eh?

Can't think outside of the box I see.

My question to you was, if government would simply charge more for the services they provide, so as to generate a profit, would that satisfy you?

Think about it while you're watching Fox News this morning.

woof
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#15111 Dec 9, 2012
Thoughts on the "fiscal cliff":

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/business/ge...

I read "Getting to Yes" in 1998. Takes about two hours to read, a very short, and informative book.

The GOP is gonna lose this showdown, eventually.

woof
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#15112 Dec 9, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Do Women Earn Less than Men?
Another contemporary economic myth is that women make 75 cents for every dollar men make because they’re discriminated against in labor markets. Like other myths, this does have a kernel of truth to it. So for example, if you add up all the incomes of women and divide by the number of women in the labor force and then do the same thing for men, what you’ll find is, on average, women do make about 75% of what men do.
What’s happening here is not discrimination in the labor market, but differences in the choices that men and women make (about investing in their knowledge, their education, their skills, and their job experiences) that lead to them getting paid different salaries.
See video at: http://www.learnliberty.org/content/do-women-...
And learn something for a change ASSHOLE!
I forgot that you have never met Lily Leadbetter personally and the only things that exists in this world are your anecdotal experiences.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#15113 Dec 9, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
One of the reasons I drive Japanese today is because of my dozens of experiences delivering to the Auto plants in Ohio. Worthless F's.
You tried to get hired in in Twinsburg and Brookpark, but they rejected you, didn't they?

woof
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#15114 Dec 9, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
You tried to get hired in in Twinsburg and Brookpark, but they rejected you, didn't they?
woof
Nah. I work outside--not inside. I would never take a job where you have to be inside all day long.

I'm also glad that our company doesn't deliver to auto plants all that much compared to when I used to work for tool and die places where they were our customers, and you had to deal with those idiots several times a week.

When times were slow and they had to layoff those auto workers, they would be on the news crying their eyes out. I would watch, laugh, and yell at my television set "GOOD FOR YOU, YOU WORTHLESS MOTHER......" I can't tell you how many times I had to work late because of those good for nothing union workers.

I could usually get loaded in about a half-hour. When I got to some of these auto plants, I would be there for three or four hours trying to get unloaded. UAW workers are useless, absolutely useless.
xxxrayted

Cleveland, OH

#15115 Dec 9, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
My My My, getting a little highbrow on your box truck brethren, eh?
Can't think outside of the box I see.
My question to you was, if government would simply charge more for the services they provide, so as to generate a profit, would that satisfy you?
Think about it while you're watching Fox News this morning.
woof
The only time I watch Fox is for the Bill O' show. That's about it.

I never said I was dissatisfied with government services. I was only pointing out that there is a difference between profit services and government services; the difference between marketable services and non-marketable services. You seem to think they are all the same.

I don't expect government to make a profit. If they are making some sort of profit and taxing me, then I'm being overtaxed.
Duke for Mayor

Uniontown, OH

#15116 Dec 9, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
The only time I watch Fox is for the Bill O' show. That's about it.
I never said I was dissatisfied with government services. I was only pointing out that there is a difference between profit services and government services; the difference between marketable services and non-marketable services. You seem to think they are all the same.
I don't expect government to make a profit. If they are making some sort of profit and taxing me, then I'm being overtaxed.
And conversely, if they aren't making a profit, then you are not being overtaxed.

Wasn't that fun?

woof

“The One! The Only! RUKiddingme”

Since: Dec 08

Jersey, Baby!

#15117 Dec 9, 2012
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah. I work outside--not inside.
I remember you now! I gave you twenty bucks last week.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#15118 Dec 9, 2012
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Except, of course, those precious RTW employees would use the same grievance procedure to try to keep their jobs should they be fired.
one thing about it if enough employees would be allowed quit financially supporting the unions that supports that behavior I will bet the union's attitude would definitely change protecting Worthless F??cks like that because all those Worthless F??cks do is drag everyone else that acts like an adult & cares down with them.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#15119 Dec 9, 2012
Duke for Mayor wrote:
<quoted text>
Indy,I know all of that, of course.
Now substitute the word "government", and maybe these dolts on here will figure out why government spending on things like, water ans sewer systems,sanitation services, street repairs, construction and plowing, courts and courthouses, health departments, zoning offices, police, fire, and emergency services, public schools, dog catchers (don't listen Duke), jails, prisons, and detention centers, representative governmental offices, etc, and on, and on...is included in the GDP.
woof
woof
government sector jobs are considered Public service jobs that provide service to the public and cost the public, and dont produce items that have use & monetary value like a vehicle which has both and this is where the government makes their money to pay for those government public service jobs through taxes.

What is a public service job?

Best Answer

Any job which supplies a 'service' to the general public. Example: Police - firefighter - sanitation worker - etc - etc.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_a_public_se...
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#15120 Dec 9, 2012
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>one thing about it if enough employees would be allowed quit financially supporting the unions that supports that behavior I will bet the union's attitude would definitely change protecting Worthless F??cks like that because all those Worthless F??cks do is drag everyone else that acts like an adult & cares down with them.
Unions aren't going anywhere. The minute unions lose their clout (if that were to happen) management will immediately begin to take advantage of labor again. They are too greedy not to. When that happens, unions will come back as strong as ever. If management would voluntarily deal with its labor in good faith, labor wouldn't need to organize.

“Larchmont's Leading Citizen”

Since: Dec 12

Hilliard, OH

#15121 Dec 9, 2012
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Unions aren't going anywhere. The minute unions lose their clout (if that were to happen) management will immediately begin to take advantage of labor again. They are too greedy not to. When that happens, unions will come back as strong as ever. If management would voluntarily deal with its labor in good faith, labor wouldn't need to organize.
I'd say a stunning loss of clout was exhibited by the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers at Hostess when they found themselves unemployed right before Christmas.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#15122 Dec 9, 2012
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Unions aren't going anywhere. The minute unions lose their clout (if that were to happen) management will immediately begin to take advantage of labor again. They are too greedy not to. When that happens, unions will come back as strong as ever. If management would voluntarily deal with its labor in good faith, labor wouldn't need to organize.
I am not saying unions are going away unless the Federal Government repeals the Wagner or the National Labor Relations Act but attitudes within the Unions will change which do in RTW states I have worked in both RTW & Non and RTW states the union works harder to maintain dues because they know the employee has the final decision to pay due or not, not the Union. I will tell you right now 70 years ago the unions would have not tolerated that behavior of smoking pot & drinking while during their workshift.

The National Labor Relations Act, NLRA, or Wagner Act

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Labor_R...
Che Reagan Christ

Lodi, OH

#15123 Dec 9, 2012
Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:
<quoted text>I'd say a stunning loss of clout was exhibited by the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers at Hostess when they found themselves unemployed right before Christmas.
Whether that was a loss of clout or not remains to be seen. They chose to not to be management's bitch. There comes a point when getting a new job is better than staying at the lousy job you have.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#15124 Dec 9, 2012
Che Reagan Christ wrote:
<quoted text>
Unions aren't going anywhere. The minute unions lose their clout (if that were to happen) management will immediately begin to take advantage of labor again. They are too greedy not to. When that happens, unions will come back as strong as ever. If management would voluntarily deal with its labor in good faith, labor wouldn't need to organize.
Very Astute statement.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cleveland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 2 hr Go go dancer 19,490
Protests break out in Cleveland over Tamir Rice... 6 hr Gibs Me Dat 2
Hands Up Now Doesn't Matter as the Truth Change... 7 hr Culture Auditor 1
Tamir Rice's father has history of domestic vio... 13 hr mike 1
Columbus' Murder Rate Tops Cincinnati, Clevelan... (Oct '10) Nov 26 Ohian Abroad 82
who enjoys dilaudid as much as i do? Nov 25 Keepitreal9 3
Tamir Rice rally at Cleveland's Public Square s... Nov 24 Lucas Mc Cain 1
Cleveland Dating
Find my Match

Cleveland People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Cleveland News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Cleveland

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:03 pm PST

Bleacher Report 7:03PM
Breaking Down Cleveland's Game Plan vs. Buffalo
NBC Sports12:30 AM
Lions begin crucial homestand with win over Bears - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 2:00 AM
Bold Predictions for Browns' Week 13 Matchup
NFL 5:57 AM
Marc Trestman on loss to Lions: 'I'm looking inside'
NBC Sports 9:12 AM
Glover Quin scoffs at Bears trying to pad stats late in loss