xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30987 Jul 3, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is the GOP blocking any effort that President Obama makes to improve our infrastructure? Because of the scary foreigners? Because they are trying to get people off of welfare? Because they are trying to increase the workforce? What is it, Taliban Ray?
Let me introduce you to a new word liberals are unfamiliar with: Broke.

Okay, what does broke mean?

Broke means no money. Broke likely means in debt. Broke means failure.

So why would Republicans object to spending money we don't have? Because what idiot would vote for failure? Well...... a Democrat of course.

But besides that, we have evidence that spending tax dollars on infrastructure has no impact on our financial situation. Check out the Pork Bill, or as DumBama called it, the Stimulus Bill.

You see, the financial success of our country is a simple calculation that the private sector supports the public sector. In other words, people in the private industry create wealth. Some of that wealth is extracted via taxes to support the public sector.

One of the reasons DumBama and the Democrats are such failures at this is because they tried (and are still trying) to do the exact opposite: the public sector supporting the private sector.

Why doesn't this work? Quite simple, because the public sectors has no money. The public sector produces no sellable goods or services. Therefore, the public sector makes no profit.
The public sector depends on profit making entities like the private sector to survive. Is this information privy to Republicans only? Of course not. Even Democrat politicians are not that dumb, but their constituents are.

So once again, Rush is right when he said "Liberals don't measure success by results, liberals measure success by intent." Let me give you an example:

The Golden Gate Bridge is not only a model of American ingenuity, but a landmark as well. It's a beautiful bridge that millions from all over the world come to see. The problem with the bridge? Kooks jump off of it to commit suicide.

Now they want to use 76 million of our dollars to erect a safety net to stop people from jumping off of the bridge. Will that stop people from committing suicides? Of course not, and even the Democrats in charge understand this. But it's a dog and pony show liberal constituents like to see. As Rush said, it doesn't matter if it solves anything, as long as it looks like they care.

So the liberal solution to this problem is to take a beautiful bridge and make it ugly. Invite all kinds of daredevils to jump off into the steel safety net; some of which will become paralyzed or otherwise die in the process, and will place all kinds of liability on the taxpayers of San Francisco. Not to mention all the rescue personnel needed for these clowns plus the maintenance of the safety nets. Will all this money and resources stop one suicide? No, but again, it looks good.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#30989 Jul 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me introduce you to a new word liberals are unfamiliar with: Broke.
Okay, what does broke mean?
Broke means no money. Broke likely means in debt. Broke means failure.
So why would Republicans object to spending money we don't have? Because what idiot would vote for failure? Well...... a Democrat of course.
But besides that, we have evidence that spending tax dollars on infrastructure has no impact on our financial situation. Check out the Pork Bill, or as DumBama called it, the Stimulus Bill.
You see, the financial success of our country is a simple calculation that the private sector supports the public sector. In other words, people in the private industry create wealth. Some of that wealth is extracted via taxes to support the public sector.
One of the reasons DumBama and the Democrats are such failures at this is because they tried (and are still trying) to do the exact opposite: the public sector supporting the private sector.
Why doesn't this work? Quite simple, because the public sectors has no money. The public sector produces no sellable goods or services. Therefore, the public sector makes no profit.
The public sector depends on profit making entities like the private sector to survive. Is this information privy to Republicans only? Of course not. Even Democrat politicians are not that dumb, but their constituents are.
So once again, Rush is right when he said "Liberals don't measure success by results, liberals measure success by intent." Let me give you an example:
The Golden Gate Bridge is not only a model of American ingenuity, but a landmark as well. It's a beautiful bridge that millions from all over the world come to see. The problem with the bridge? Kooks jump off of it to commit suicide.
Now they want to use 76 million of our dollars to erect a safety net to stop people from jumping off of the bridge. Will that stop people from committing suicides? Of course not, and even the Democrats in charge understand this. But it's a dog and pony show liberal constituents like to see. As Rush said, it doesn't matter if it solves anything, as long as it looks like they care.
So the liberal solution to this problem is to take a beautiful bridge and make it ugly. Invite all kinds of daredevils to jump off into the steel safety net; some of which will become paralyzed or otherwise die in the process, and will place all kinds of liability on the taxpayers of San Francisco. Not to mention all the rescue personnel needed for these clowns plus the maintenance of the safety nets. Will all this money and resources stop one suicide? No, but again, it looks good.
And the glorified, hi-cube box van driving delivery boy proves once again that he drives around with one grubby fat hand on the steering wheel and the other one between his legs drooling over every idiotic thing that Rush Limpbaugh Limpdick tells him. Brings back the good old days when Clinton was in office for you doesn't it?
Believer

Gallipolis, OH

#30990 Jul 4, 2014
Previous comment made absolutely no sense at all!
Poop Chit

United States

#30991 Jul 4, 2014
Your religious freedom ends where my demand for you to pay for my chit begins!
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#30992 Jul 4, 2014
Believer wrote:
Previous comment made absolutely no sense at all!
Correct, but trolls really don't care about staying on topic or making sense.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Lodi, OH

#30993 Jul 4, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>No because the US Constitution is always involved with any Federal Law that is passed by Congress.
To the point that congress exists because of the constitution, I suppose you are correct. The interpretation of federal statute, unless the constitutionality of the statute is directly questioned, does not require application of any constitutional principles. The Hobby Lobby case was decided on the interplay between two competing statutes, not the constitution. You should take some time to contemplate that and appreciate that you have learned something.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Lodi, OH

#30994 Jul 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me introduce you to a new word liberals are unfamiliar with: Broke.
Okay, what does broke mean?
Broke means no money. Broke likely means in debt. Broke means failure.
So why would Republicans object to spending money we don't have? Because what idiot would vote for failure? Well...... a Democrat of course.
But besides that, we have evidence that spending tax dollars on infrastructure has no impact on our financial situation. Check out the Pork Bill, or as DumBama called it, the Stimulus Bill.
You see, the financial success of our country is a simple calculation that the private sector supports the public sector. In other words, people in the private industry create wealth. Some of that wealth is extracted via taxes to support the public sector.
One of the reasons DumBama and the Democrats are such failures at this is because they tried (and are still trying) to do the exact opposite: the public sector supporting the private sector.
Why doesn't this work? Quite simple, because the public sectors has no money. The public sector produces no sellable goods or services. Therefore, the public sector makes no profit.
The public sector depends on profit making entities like the private sector to survive. Is this information privy to Republicans only? Of course not. Even Democrat politicians are not that dumb, but their constituents are.
So once again, Rush is right when he said "Liberals don't measure success by results, liberals measure success by intent." Let me give you an example:
The Golden Gate Bridge is not only a model of American ingenuity, but a landmark as well. It's a beautiful bridge that millions from all over the world come to see. The problem with the bridge? Kooks jump off of it to commit suicide.
Now they want to use 76 million of our dollars to erect a safety net to stop people from jumping off of the bridge. Will that stop people from committing suicides? Of course not, and even the Democrats in charge understand this. But it's a dog and pony show liberal constituents like to see. As Rush said, it doesn't matter if it solves anything, as long as it looks like they care.
So the liberal solution to this problem is to take a beautiful bridge and make it ugly. Invite all kinds of daredevils to jump off into the steel safety net; some of which will become paralyzed or otherwise die in the process, and will place all kinds of liability on the taxpayers of San Francisco. Not to mention all the rescue personnel needed for these clowns plus the maintenance of the safety nets. Will all this money and resources stop one suicide? No, but again, it looks good.
I hope you are on the next bridge that collapses. When you get to the ER without any insurance someone can meet you with one simple word. Broke.
Canton

Canton, OH

#30995 Jul 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me introduce you to a new word liberals are unfamiliar with: Broke.
Okay, what does broke mean?
Broke means no money. Broke likely means in debt. Broke means failure.
So why would Republicans object to spending money we don't have? Because what idiot would vote for failure? Well...... a Democrat of course.
But besides that, we have evidence that spending tax dollars on infrastructure has no impact on our financial situation. Check out the Pork Bill, or as DumBama called it, the Stimulus Bill.
You see, the financial success of our country is a simple calculation that the private sector supports the public sector. In other words, people in the private industry create wealth. Some of that wealth is extracted via taxes to support the public sector.
One of the reasons DumBama and the Democrats are such failures at this is because they tried (and are still trying) to do the exact opposite: the public sector supporting the private sector.
Why doesn't this work? Quite simple, because the public sectors has no money. The public sector produces no sellable goods or services. Therefore, the public sector makes no profit.
The public sector depends on profit making entities like the private sector to survive. Is this information privy to Republicans only? Of course not. Even Democrat politicians are not that dumb, but their constituents are.
So once again, Rush is right when he said "Liberals don't measure success by results, liberals measure success by intent." Let me give you an example:
The Golden Gate Bridge is not only a model of American ingenuity, but a landmark as well. It's a beautiful bridge that millions from all over the world come to see. The problem with the bridge? Kooks jump off of it to commit suicide.
Now they want to use 76 million of our dollars to erect a safety net to stop people from jumping off of the bridge. Will that stop people from committing suicides? Of course not, and even the Democrats in charge understand this. But it's a dog and pony show liberal constituents like to see. As Rush said, it doesn't matter if it solves anything, as long as it looks like they care.
So the liberal solution to this problem is to take a beautiful bridge and make it ugly. Invite all kinds of daredevils to jump off into the steel safety net; some of which will become paralyzed or otherwise die in the process, and will place all kinds of liability on the taxpayers of San Francisco. Not to mention all the rescue personnel needed for these clowns plus the maintenance of the safety nets. Will all this money and resources stop one suicide? No, but again, it looks good.
Let me introduce you to a notion that you Tea Bagging Bible voters live in denial about. Halliburton made billions in no-bid contracts rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure. Seems we weren't "broke" then.
Canton

Canton, OH

#30996 Jul 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
They get upset every time their left-wing blogs tell them otherwise, like "It's the Republicans who are obstructionists."
They elected a joker that not only doesn't know his job, but refuses to deal with anybody. Then when things don't get done, it has nothing to do with the Democrats, NO, it has to do with the Republicans only.
It doesn't take two to Tango as long as liberals think they can use it for their side. Did you see or hear how DumBama acted after the SC ruling? Like a brat that was told by his mother he couldn't have an item in the store that he wanted. I was actually waiting for him to say "Now I have three pens and three cell phones."
Yah, you know us. Always slopping around links to bogus propaganda blogs. No...wait. That's you. You're the one who posts links to proven bogus propaganda blogs and calls them facts. You're the one who we have to constantly remind about posting garbage for proof of you claims. Typical lazy right winger welfare queens. Get up off your belly. Do you think that men fought and died for this nation just so you can crawl on your belly like a cowardly dog for the big boss man?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#30997 Jul 4, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
To the point that congress exists because of the constitution, I suppose you are correct. The interpretation of federal statute, unless the constitutionality of the statute is directly questioned, does not require application of any constitutional principles. The Hobby Lobby case was decided on the interplay between two competing statutes, not the constitution. You should take some time to contemplate that and appreciate that you have learned something.
Those statutes had to do with the 1st amendment of the US Constitution is the point and like I said the SCOTUS went about it a different way and the Liberals are in arms because of it.
Canton

Canton, OH

#30998 Jul 4, 2014
I think a certain trucking company needs to start taking 10% of every driver's pay who doesn't attend church, as a tithe. This corporate religious thing has all kind of neat possibilities. I wonder if a Muslim owned Hobby Lobby and they were trying to block women having birth control due to the religion of Islam, how the Supreme Court would have ruled? I think we all know the answer to that one. Also, I wonder why the founders of this nation made no mention about money being speech or corporations being people?
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Lodi, OH

#30999 Jul 4, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Those statutes had to do with the 1st amendment of the US Constitution is the point and like I said the SCOTUS went about it a different way and the Liberals are in arms because of it.
I think you should stick to copying and pasting Wikipedia links. You are out of your element on this one, Donnie.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31000 Jul 4, 2014
Canton wrote:
I think a certain trucking company needs to start taking 10% of every driver's pay who doesn't attend church, as a tithe. This corporate religious thing has all kind of neat possibilities. I wonder if a Muslim owned Hobby Lobby and they were trying to block women having birth control due to the religion of Islam, how the Supreme Court would have ruled? I think we all know the answer to that one. Also, I wonder why the founders of this nation made no mention about money being speech or corporations being people?
Its right in the US Constitution plain as day. It's between Church and State and Abortion Rights about six paragraphs past Hate Crimes
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31001 Jul 4, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Yah, you know us. Always slopping around links to bogus propaganda blogs. No...wait. That's you. You're the one who posts links to proven bogus propaganda blogs and calls them facts. You're the one who we have to constantly remind about posting garbage for proof of you claims. Typical lazy right winger welfare queens. Get up off your belly. Do you think that men fought and died for this nation just so you can crawl on your belly like a cowardly dog for the big boss man?
You've never proven any of my evidence wrong. You do the same thing all liberals do which is criticize the source instead of the evidence. You liberals think you've won the debate when all you're really done is prove you can't defend what you wrote.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31002 Jul 4, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me introduce you to a notion that you Tea Bagging Bible voters live in denial about. Halliburton made billions in no-bid contracts rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure. Seems we weren't "broke" then.
Haliburton built the Iraqi infrastructure so who better to call for a repair than them? Not to mention Haliburton has been involved with every rebuilding project of the US since Vietnam, and that's besides the fact no other corporation was large enough to take on such a massive project like Iraq.

How much stock did you have in Haliburton after the Iraq war?
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31003 Jul 4, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
I hope you are on the next bridge that collapses. When you get to the ER without any insurance someone can meet you with one simple word. Broke.
And who's fault is that? He wouldn't happen to have a (D) next to his name, now would he?
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#31004 Jul 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Let me introduce you to a new word liberals are unfamiliar with: Broke.
Well, you are right about that. I haven't been broke for many years. I've always planned for the future, and financial security was high on my list. Liberals believe that the future can be better than the past, and that was how I planned.
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, what does broke mean?
Among other things, being broke means that you can't afford to buy health insurance, and that you will depend on the charity of other people when you get sick.

Meanwhile, those of us that are invested in the stock market are feeling rather flush right now. My personal net worth has never been higher.

"The Dow Jones industrial average continued its heady climb into uncharted territory on the eve of the Fourth of July, eclipsing the 17,000 milestone for the first time in its 118-year history and building on the bullish start to the second half of 2014.

After coming within 2 points of 17,000 Tuesday, the Dow finally cracked what Wall Street is dubbing “Dow 17K” after the government reported that a better-than-expected 288,000 jobs were created last month and the unemployment rate dipped to 6.1%, its lowest level since September 2008."

http://americasmarkets.usatoday.com/2014/07/0...
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Lodi, OH

#31005 Jul 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
And who's fault is that? He wouldn't happen to have a (D) next to his name, now would he?
It's your fault Ray. Man up.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31006 Jul 4, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, you are right about that. I haven't been broke for many years. I've always planned for the future, and financial security was high on my list. Liberals believe that the future can be better than the past, and that was how I planned.
<quoted text>
Among other things, being broke means that you can't afford to buy health insurance, and that you will depend on the charity of other people when you get sick.
Meanwhile, those of us that are invested in the stock market are feeling rather flush right now. My personal net worth has never been higher.
"The Dow Jones industrial average continued its heady climb into uncharted territory on the eve of the Fourth of July, eclipsing the 17,000 milestone for the first time in its 118-year history and building on the bullish start to the second half of 2014.
After coming within 2 points of 17,000 Tuesday, the Dow finally cracked what Wall Street is dubbing “Dow 17K” after the government reported that a better-than-expected 288,000 jobs were created last month and the unemployment rate dipped to 6.1%, its lowest level since September 2008."
http://americasmarkets.usatoday.com/2014/07/0...
That's good Old Guy. Take advantage of all the phony money being poured into the market because it can't last forever. Also, make sure you pull out in time because the bubble being created in the stock market right now will make the housing bubble seem like a pikers loss.

And BTW, I've had health insurance my entire life until the Commie took over the White House. As I explained repeatedly, I made sure that I only accepted jobs with health insurance even though it meant working for less money. But since Democrats attack responsible people because responsible people don't need government, I now have no insurance at all. My insurance went to irresponsible people that never had it. You know, the Obama voter type.
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Lodi, OH

#31007 Jul 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
That's good Old Guy. Take advantage of all the phony money being poured into the market because it can't last forever. Also, make sure you pull out in time because the bubble being created in the stock market right now will make the housing bubble seem like a pikers loss.
And BTW, I've had health insurance my entire life until the Commie took over the White House. As I explained repeatedly, I made sure that I only accepted jobs with health insurance even though it meant working for less money. But since Democrats attack responsible people because responsible people don't need government, I now have no insurance at all. My insurance went to irresponsible people that never had it. You know, the Obama voter type.
There is nothing, other than your desire to wallow in your ill conceived martyrdom, stopping you from getting a job that provides health insurance, Ray.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Cleveland Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Kristy Capel makes me sick 9 hr maestro64 1
The Enduring Mystery Of Beverly Jarosz (Feb '08) 10 hr linda 1,068
CASTRO CLAN and its JEHOVAH'S WITNESS Connection (May '13) Wed Idiot Reproofer 19
Kristi Capel uses racial slur on air; Cleveland... Feb 24 Try 2
The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) Feb 24 mjjcpa 19,631
looking for paulina smith, danny jr smith, jenn... Feb 23 jgoines 1
Trayvon Martin's mother brings her message of i... Feb 22 mike 1
Cleveland Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Cleveland People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:05 pm PST

Bleacher Report 8:05PM
Broncos' Ultimate Free-Agency To-Do List
Bleacher Report 3:30 AM
Browns' Ultimate Free Agency to-Do List
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Revisiting the Cleveland Browns' 2014 Draft
Yahoo! Sports 8:12 AM
AP source: Bills negotiating to sign quarterback McCown
NFL 9:44 AM
Ready to ride the Theo Riddick hype train?