Alzheimer's disease tracking,,,,,,
Posted in the Youngstown Forum
#1 Oct 3, 2012
Proof by assertion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proof by assertion, sometimes informally referred to as proof by repeated assertion, is a logical fallacy in which a proposition is repeatedly restated regardless of contradiction. Sometimes this may be repeated until challenges dry up, at which point it is asserted as fact due to its not being contradicted (argumentum ad nauseam). In other cases its repetition may be cited as evidence of its truth, in a variant of the appeal to authority or appeal to belief fallacies.
A lie told often enough becomes the truth
If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth
This logical fallacy is sometimes used as a form of rhetoric by politicians, or during a debate as a filibuster. In its extreme form, it can also be a form of brainwashing. Modern politics contains many examples of proof by assertions. This practice can be observed in the use of political slogans, and the distribution of "talking points", which are collections of short phrases that are issued to members of modern political parties for recitation to achieve maximum message repetition. The technique is also sometimes used in advertising.[3
#2 Oct 3, 2012
Communal reinforcement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Communal reinforcement is a social phenomenon in which a concept or idea is repeatedly asserted in a community, regardless of whether sufficient empirical ...
#3 Oct 3, 2012
Community - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The term community has two distinct commutive meanings: 1) Community usually refers to a social unit larger than a small village that shares common values.
#4 Oct 3, 2012
In informal logic and rhetoric, a fallacy is usually an error in reasoning often due to a misconception or a presumption. Some so-called fallacies are not rhetorically intended to appeal to reason but rather to emotion, or a more nuanced disposition. An informal analysis of rhetorical patterns in fallacies should not be confused with rigorously formal arguments in logic, because rationally persuasive arguments require neither to be successful.
Though often used unintentionally, so-called fallacies can be used purposefully to win arguments. Such rhetorical devices, discussed in more detail below, are: "ignoring the question" to divert argument to unrelated issues using a red herring; making the argument personal (argumentum ad hominem) and discrediting the opposition's character, "begging the question" (petitio principi), the use of the non-sequitur, false cause and effect (post hoc ergo propter hoc), bandwagoning (everyone says so), the "false dilemma" or "either-or fallacy" in which the situation is oversimplified, "card-stacking" or selective use of facts, "false equivalence", and "false analogy". Another common device is the "false generalization", an abstraction of the argument that shifts discussion to platitudes where the facts of the matter are lost. There are many, many more tricks to divert attention from careful exploration of a subject.
A well defined formal fallacy, logical fallacy or deductive fallacy, is typically called an invalid argument. An informal fallacy is argument that may fail to be rationally persuasive.
#5 Oct 3, 2012
alot of people have asked me what is wrong with labor union people that come in their stores and shops,,,,,,,,, all these parts fit
Add your comments below
|Nut jobs||Feb 25||Lord have Mercy||1|
|Reminiscing of 60s and 70s Youngstown (Dec '09)||Feb 16||Troll master Willie||21|
|Sound Advice: What to do when little sound come...||Feb 9||radio hack||1|
|Looking for biological brother||Feb 1||BLACK MILITARY FA...||1|
|General Motors||Jan '15||Troll master Willie||2|
|Hourly rate for temp at General Motors||Jan '15||Troll master Willie||2|
|Man draws 27 months prison in drug case||Jan '15||Hannibal||1|
Find what you want!
Search Youngstown Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC