Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201862 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

phaines

Big Bear Lake, CA

#141057 May 13, 2012
lol..

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#141058 May 13, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>Yes and when Lincoln went to bat for the slaves it caused a civil war, in the end slavery was abolished. Golly it seems right does win out.
and when the b

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#141059 May 13, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>Yes and when Lincoln went to bat for the slaves it caused a civil war, in the end slavery was abolished. Golly it seems right does win out.
majority of Americans votes you back to the closet you will wish you had any civil rights

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#141060 May 13, 2012
The Great Sly_Clyde wrote:
<quoted text>I find that hard to believe. You see Mr Bigot in six states it very much law that Gay people can marry. Thus we have the exact problem that this thread pertains to. Once a right is granted to remove it based on sexuality( Homosexual vs Heterosexual) is called discrimination.
Oh and BTW shove yer bible up your love canal.
and the tide is changing against you

Just a few years ago we had one state with a ban and now we ha over 30

Yup........Times are a changing

“Facts”

Since: May 08

Mexico

#141061 May 13, 2012
Dowid_L_Bronschtayn wrote:
<quoted text>That's silly: the legal existence of a right to free speech is not contradicted by the fact that some people can't talk (or write or gesture meaningfully). Rights still exist even if in potentia, because they are statements about State power, either as limits to State power (what the State may or may not with/for/to you) or as requirements of it (what the State must do for you); Heinlein's character's argument that the isolated man drowning in the middle of the ocean has no 'right to life' is categorically inept in the same way, as he is (presumably) beyond State power to effect his rescue.
As a matter of settled law, heterosexual couples, with very few exceptions (where 'few' refers to the fraction of people in the U.S. who are your parents or siblings) have a right to marry even if (e.g.) one of them were incarcerated.
they gay community turned down equal rights to pursue the changing of the word marriage and that has back fired

The vast majority can and will vote them back to the closet
Whack a Troll

Condon, OR

#141062 May 13, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
majority of Americans votes you back to the closet you will wish you had any civil rights
Mr. nOne promotes the Building of Nazi Style Concentration Camps for those who disobey him. The Crematorium are under construction.

Don't doubt it.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#141063 May 13, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I doubt you can find too many killings here in the US that are the result of killing in the name of God. But plz try. Muslims have been killing each other since the beginning, Sunni vs shia. Who will win? Those dictators are the only ones that know how to control them, look at results, taking them out brings more chaos, are u crzy? Obama's huge mistake is taking out dictators. Now the Muslim brotherhood and other radical groups are taking control.
Excuse me? BUSH took out Sadam.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#141064 May 13, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
they gay community turned down equal rights to pursue the changing of the word marriage and that has back fired
The vast majority can and will vote them back to the closet
Yeah..... right after we vote YOU nutjob of the century.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#141065 May 13, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text> That same sex marriage makes either a man or woman is disposable and the differences between man and woman aren't emotional arguments, they are based on the definition of same sex marriage and human nature.
Please try to keep up.
Honestly, Brian! How does same sex marriage make ANYONE disposable?? Don't you think that is an emotional argument? It certainly isn't factual. Do you have ANY idea how ridiculous you sound?

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#141066 May 13, 2012
WHY VOTE wrote:
Ok, I don't really care if same sex people get married or are together in any capacity. I am for equal rights BUT.......... I am very annoyed that peoples votes don't mean anything anymore. What happened to a majority vote rules? What happened to the peoples voice?
My stance on this has nothing to do with same sex couples. This is just the latest thing a court has overturned or blocked that THE PEOPLE voted for. Look at AZ., look back at prop. 187 which would have saved is billions in illegal immigrant funding. The people of the USA are trying to make changes to better our country and the few judges are effectively disenfranchising us.
Again this is not directed at same sex couples it is major frustration over the majority loosing there voice.
WHY VOTE????
Their votes DID count. Their voices were heard. They were simply told that they voted for something that violates civil rights.

What about the times when the anti-gay industry tries to over-ride the will of the people by overturning laws passed by the people who were elected to represent the people?

We're a REPRESENTATIVE Democracy. With a Constitution.

I just addressed someone who opposes equality for gays and lesbians on another thread who said, "The family is...the 'first form of government'... marriage is a fundamental constitutional right & international human right precious because it comes before government and cannot be manipulated, re-defined, or ripped from its foundations....As old as Pericles humanity has noted the family as a bulwark against state tyranny.”- Fitz

I responded, "What is ironic is that we are both saying the same thing."

Gays and lesbians aren't opposing the heterosexual idea of family. We aren't asking the government to manipulate, re-define or rip it apart. As Fitz pointed out,“family” can not be re-defined.

Yet some want to manipulate, re-define it or rip apart the families we create.(Ron Paul, Santorum, Mitt Romney, Tony Perkins, NOM etc.). These groups and people don’t seem to see that not only are they trying to re-define and rip apart gays and lesbians, they are in fact attacking the families we came from and the families of those heterosexuals who support our cause.
Rand Paul mocked Obama for citing the Golden Rule in what I consider to be a very crude gay joke about gay sex.“"It did kind of bother me though that he used the justification for it in a biblical reference," Paul continued.”He said the biblical golden rule caused him to be for gay marriage. And I'm like what version of the Bible is he reading… I don't know what version he's getting it from.” He got a big laugh from the audience. They all knew he wasn’t really talking about the Golden Rule but was using it to mock oral and anal sex. We all know that heterosexuals also engage in those two things and no one bats an eye.

So now we add the Golden Rule to the terms being claimed the exclusive property of anti-gay heterosexuals; 'moral values',‘marriage’,'family’?

Well I’m not going to consent to that anymore than I will submit to the idea that Fundamentalists have a patent on the word “marriage” or that blacks are the only group who can use the term “civil rights” or that only Hispanics can use the word “Tacos”.

Who's the real tyrant here? The people who are following the Golden Rule and supporting our rights or the ones like Rand Paul and the rest of the fundamentalists who want to ignore what they preach? Another poster,‘RevKen’ referred to this “do as I say not as I do” behavior as “Institutionalized Hypocrisy”. I couldn’t phrase it any better.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#141067 May 13, 2012
Here Is One wrote:
<quoted text>
they gay community turned down equal rights to pursue the changing of the word marriage and that has back fired
The vast majority can and will vote them back to the closet
I just addressed someone who opposes equality for gays and lesbians on another thread who said, "The family is...the 'first form of government'... marriage is a fundamental constitutional right & international human right precious because it comes before government and cannot be manipulated, re-defined, or ripped from its foundations....As old as Pericles humanity has noted the family as a bulwark against state tyranny.”- Fitz

I responded, "What is ironic is that we are both saying the same thing."

Gays and lesbians aren't opposing the heterosexual idea of family. We aren't asking the government to manipulate, re-define or rip it apart. As Fitz pointed out,“family” can not be re-defined.

Yet some want to manipulate, re-define it or rip apart the families we create.(Ron Paul, Santorum, Mitt Romney, Tony Perkins, NOM etc.). These groups and people don’t seem to see that not only are they trying to re-define and rip apart gays and lesbians, they are in fact attacking the families we came from and the families of those heterosexuals who support our cause.
Rand Paul mocked Obama for citing the Golden Rule in what I consider to be a very crude gay joke about gay sex.“"It did kind of bother me though that he used the justification for it in a biblical reference," Paul continued.”He said the biblical golden rule caused him to be for gay marriage. And I'm like what version of the Bible is he reading… I don't know what version he's getting it from.” He got a big laugh from the audience. They all knew he wasn’t really talking about the Golden Rule but was using it to mock oral and anal sex. We all know that heterosexuals also engage in those two things and no one bats an eye.

So now we add the Golden Rule to the terms being claimed the exclusive property of anti-gay heterosexuals; 'moral values',‘marriage’,'family’?

Well I’m not going to consent to that anymore than I will submit to the idea that Fundamentalists have a patent on the word “marriage” or that blacks are the only group who can use the term “civil rights” or that only Hispanics can use the word “Tacos”.

Who's the real tyrant here? The people who are following the Golden Rule and supporting our rights or the ones like Rand Paul and the rest of the fundamentalists who want to ignore what they preach? Another poster,‘RevKen’ referred to this “do as I say not as I do” behavior as “Institutionalized Hypocrisy”. I couldn’t phrase it any better.
RiccardoFire

Elk Grove, CA

#141068 May 13, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuse me? BUSH took out Sadam.
No shyte ellis. Did u just find that out? Huge mistake. and Obama took out the others from Egypt to Libya helping the Islamics u freaking retard.
Joe Fortuna

Happy Valley, OR

#141070 May 13, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>but we are not a Christian nation, we don't fight as a Christian nation we are not fighting with a cross. we don't kill and shout Praise Jesus.
I think a lot of christian would disagree with you about the US not being a christian nation.
I'm pretty sure they would agree we aren't fight for jesus.
Elder Perry

Oakland, CA

#141071 May 13, 2012
Shortly after Willard Mitt Romney is sworn in as president, he will, in accordance with his church's policy, issue executive orders that effect the following laws:

1. The prohibition of all same-sex relationships including co-habitation, civil unions and marriage.

2. In accordance with the Mormon Scripture, Doctrine & Covenants, Section 89. All possession, sales, production and use of tobacco products will be prohibited through the nation and all territories. The same nation-wide prohibition will be applied to all alcoholic and caffeinated beverages.

3. The Celestial practice to plural marriage will be restored throughout the nation and territories and will consist of one husband and 2 or more wives.

4. And finally, the administration will revise Amendment I to the Bill of Rights to the wording that the United States recognizes only one true church on the face of this earth, the Church that, with the help of the 3 personages of the Godhead, had its authority with the help of an intelligent farm boy in Upstate New York in 1830. That Church is, of course, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormon).

Help restore the United States back to its Celestial glory as a true Christian nation by VOTING MITT ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT in November!

In the name of Jesus Christ, Amen!
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#141073 May 13, 2012
Elder Perry wrote:
Shortly after Willard Mitt Romney is sworn in as president, he will, in accordance with his church's policy, issue executive orders that effect the following laws:
1. The prohibition of all same-sex relationships including co-habitation, civil unions and marriage.
2. In accordance with the Mormon Scripture, Doctrine & Covenants, Section 89. All possession, sales, production and use of tobacco products will be prohibited through the nation and all territories. The same nation-wide prohibition will be applied to all alcoholic and caffeinated beverages.
3. The Celestial practice to plural marriage will be restored throughout the nation and territories and will consist of one husband and 2 or more wives.
4. And finally, the administration will revise Amendment I to the Bill of Rights to the wording that the United States recognizes only one true church on the face of this earth, the Church that, with the help of the 3 personages of the Godhead, had its authority with the help of an intelligent farm boy in Upstate New York in 1830. That Church is, of course, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormon).
Help restore the United States back to its Celestial glory as a true Christian nation by VOTING MITT ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT in November!
In the name of Jesus Christ, Amen!
The Presidency isn't a dictatorship.... oh wait.... you were being sarcastic.....
Winston Smith

Kansas City, MO

#141074 May 13, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
oh wait.... you were being sarcastic.....
If not then they're nuts.

I can just see the tobacco lobby's reaction and we've already done prohibition once.
Joe Fortuna

Happy Valley, OR

#141075 May 13, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>I doubt you can find too many killings here in the US that are the result of killing in the name of God. But plz try. Muslims have been killing each other since the beginning, Sunni vs shia. Who will win? Those dictators are the only ones that know how to control them, look at results, taking them out brings more chaos, are u crzy? Obama's huge mistake is taking out dictators. Now the Muslim brotherhood and other radical groups are taking control.
I have no need to post how many people in the US kill in the name of the christian god, you agree there are some, thats good enough for me. I don't believe the main stream christians would.
I think thats what I just said, as terrible as those dictators were on their own population, they were no worse than those who will replace them. There is no doudt with them in place it was better for non muslim countries.
Yes our policies in the middle east has harmed our chances at staying out of a all out war with muslim nations, mainly because they are unifing their control over those nations. What really gets me is we are suppling them with the weapons, and technical support that they will use against us.
I don't support any government that takes personal freedoms from others, or ones that want to force their morality on others.
Winston Smith

Kansas City, MO

#141076 May 13, 2012
The Word of Wisdom was given "in consequence of evils and designs which do and will exist in the hearts of conspiring men in the last days" (verse 4). As some of these designs pertain to what people eat and drink, the Word of Wisdom gives basic directions on what is good and not good, and posits a strong relationship between what individuals take into their bodies and their physical and spiritual well-being. The revelation prohibits three things: tobacco, strong drinks, and hot drinks (verses 5-9). "Strong drinks" were understood as alcoholic beverages; "hot drinks" were defined by early Church leaders as tea and coffee. Church leaders have traditionally confined relevant worthiness requirements to the prohibited items. The revelation also recommends the prudent use of herbs and fruits, the sparing consumption of meat, and the use of "all grain," but especially "wheat for man" (verses 10-17). Saints who obey the admonitions are promised health and strength, wisdom and knowledge, and protection from the destroying angel (verses 18-21).

http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Doctrine_and_Cov...

No coffee or tea either!
Joe Fortuna

Happy Valley, OR

#141077 May 13, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Another un-fair and not balanced hypocrite. How can I be off topic when I am responding to Joe and why did you not say the same to Joe? You freaking hypocrite. As if we all need to stay on topic here like this topix will decide if u can marry your brother...lol....Why don't you tell the families of those brave soldiers that it was a waste, that it didn't matter killing all those evil bastards that want to slit throats of gays.
I agree, that we can discuss what ever we choose to. If everyone stay on the frame work of this forum, this forum would be just a repeat of the first few thousand posts.
Joe Fortuna

Happy Valley, OR

#141078 May 13, 2012
Happy mothers day to all you mothers out there.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Yorba Linda Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Cathy Torrez murder in 1994 (Jul '07) 5 hr Dixie Rose 20
News Maternity tourism websites target pregnant Chin... 10 hr No White Chix 4
News CoronaCORONA: Father, son arrested in fatal fam... Thu family always 3
News Three Stabbed in Possibly Gang-Related Violence Wed Tampon Testers 1
CVUSD In the News Wed Jane 10
News Los Alamitos bucks O.C. trend, votes to keep re... Wed jcwconsult 1
18m looking for snapchat girls Jul '15 vic 4
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Yorba Linda Mortgages