Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31042 Jul 5, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahhhh tell it to "BoyToy" and "Dumbama". Typical hypocrite right wing Rush Limbaugh flunkie tactics. Hey old clown. Get off your belly. Its Saturday and boss man isn't anywhere to be seen.
One is responsible for my employer discontinuing my healthcare plan and the other who started with the name calling first.

I don't draw first blood. Told you that long ago.

Now go turn on your television set so the Democrat politicians can tell you what to think next.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31043 Jul 5, 2014
Canton wrote:
Before the Koch Brothers bought the Supreme court. After the Koch Brother bought the Supreme Court.
Nobody can buy anybody on the Supreme Court. It's not an elected position.
ino

Ashburn, VA

#31044 Jul 5, 2014
The libs are salty cause their little Zero Care had holes in it. There are many parts of it that are unconstitutional. This will fill the courts for years
. Another one will be Halbig vs Burwell

Let's hope they lose this one too.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#31045 Jul 5, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether or not the Hobby Lobby case was decided on First Amendment grounds is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of fact. And the fact is, it was not. For some reason, the self proclaimed "conservatives" on this forum have a long standing problem discerning between opinion and fact, even when fact is delivered to them.
You & others have made that point a number of times. Some people can't comprehend what they read or hear & others are in denial of what they don't want to read or hear. Sad that too many people are that way.
Pope Che Reagan Christ

Medina, OH

#31046 Jul 5, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody can buy anybody on the Supreme Court. It's not an elected position.
You can't believe that.
Canton

Canton, OH

#31047 Jul 5, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
One is responsible for my employer discontinuing my healthcare plan and the other who started with the name calling first.
I don't draw first blood. Told you that long ago.
Now go turn on your television set so the Democrat politicians can tell you what to think next.
So "he started it" is what you are going with. Ever the high road.

Also, why do you call your boss "Dumbama"? How long do you suggest we listen to you cry about the big raise you never earned or your personal irresponsibility of buying cigarettes instead of easily affordable healthcare?

Finally, why did you guys forget to thank the American hero president who gave you a big tax break? Why didn't Fox News blow trumpets from the roof of the broadcasting center when Obama gave the Tea Baggers EXACTLY what they were crying for, in the form of a tax cut? It just doesn't seem very "fair and balanced". Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Just saying fair and balanced next to Fox News is so absurd it's funny.
Canton

Canton, OH

#31048 Jul 5, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody can buy anybody on the Supreme Court. It's not an elected position.
Such a gullible little man. Drink your kool aid, rubber ducky. Scalia and Thomas only attend those Koch Brother events for the smashing finger foods...right? Pay real close attention to how many times they side with big daddy Koch. Cha-Ching! Bought and sold like a cheap floozie.
Canton

Canton, OH

#31049 Jul 5, 2014
(Also see the Christian Religion)
Canton

Canton, OH

#31050 Jul 5, 2014
Over a year ago, I stated that corporations are wh0ring out religion to push forward their agenda. Let's all thank our American hero president for giving Hobby Lobby the Affordable Healthcare Act and opening their eyes to the fact that they had been providing "baby killing" services for their employees for years before it came along. Obama lead Hobby Lobby to the true path of Christ and it will be added to his very long list of things he accomplished to save us from the Conservative created economic disaster that was looming in our country's future, thanks to the obviously poor political decisions made by people like Reality Speaks and PornTrucker.
Canton

Canton, OH

#31051 Jul 5, 2014
ino wrote:
The libs are salty cause their little Zero Care had holes in it. There are many parts of it that are unconstitutional. This will fill the courts for years
. Another one will be Halbig vs Burwell
Let's hope they lose this one too.
Just another conniving cry baby tactic of the right wing nutballs when they don't get their way. Once it sinks in what a horrible decision it was, we'll look forward to you guys rewriting history to distance yourselves from it.
Canton

Canton, OH

#31052 Jul 5, 2014
Funny how every other company that tried to play religious patty cake games with heir customers all ended up making public apologies after the will of the American people boycotted them into a panic. Dear Hobby Lobby, when you apologize to everyone, be sure to act like you mean it, or it's bankruptcy for you.
Old Guy

Mason, OH

#31053 Jul 5, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I understand just what you are saying but I would like to remind folks that the SCOTUS ruling was 5-4 with a very vocal dissent. This ruling is likely to be passionately 'discussed' for decades. There should be an effort for civility & respect for varying opinions, even tho that is not likely.
Yeah, Pops, we are living in weird times regarding the Supreme Court. It's the result of the long game that Republicans have been playing since the middle of the 20th Century. They have had a program of appointing young justices that are anti-abortion absolutists, and now they finally have a majority - a majority that is composed entirely of male Catholics. And despite all of them stating they would respect past precedents (stare decisis) during their confirmation hearings, once they got in there they started working to overturn those precedents.

This will backfire, as these things always do. The Democrats have also started nominating younger judges, so the power of these individuals will be greatly increased by their longer service. Once the Democrats gain the upper hand again, they will set about reversing all the 5-4 decisions. The real loser will be the prestige of the Supreme Court.

"The very question of partisan voting hardly arose until 1937, as dissents on the Supreme Court were infrequent. When the justices did divide, it was seldom along party lines.

There is room for interpretation in such assessments. But of the 71 cases from 1790 to 1937 deemed important by a standard reference work and in which there were at least two dissenting votes, only one broke by party affiliation.“The dividing line in the court was not a party line,” Zechariah Chafee, a law professor at Harvard, wrote in a classic 1941 book.

Nonpartisan voting patterns held true until 2010, with a brief exception in the early 1940s, when a lone Republican appointee voted to the right of eight Democratic appointees. But the general trend was the same. Of the 311 cases listed as important from 1937 to 2010 with at least two dissents, only one of them, in 1985, even arguably broke along party lines.

That adds up to two cases in more than two centuries. By contrast, in just the last three terms, there were five major decisions that were closely divided along partisan lines: the ones on the Voting Rights Act, campaign finance, arbitration, immigration and strip-searches. In the current term, last month’s campaign finance ruling and Monday’s decision on legislative prayer fit the pattern, too."

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/11/upshot/the-...
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31054 Jul 5, 2014
Canton wrote:
Funny how every other company that tried to play religious patty cake games with heir customers all ended up making public apologies after the will of the American people boycotted them into a panic. Dear Hobby Lobby, when you apologize to everyone, be sure to act like you mean it, or it's bankruptcy for you.
Absolutely. Just ask the owners of Chick-Fil-A and what happened to their sales after the media reported they were against SSM.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31055 Jul 5, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Just another conniving cry baby tactic of the right wing nutballs when they don't get their way. Once it sinks in what a horrible decision it was, we'll look forward to you guys rewriting history to distance yourselves from it.
Absolutely. In fact, our founders designed our system of government so they could force employers to do as they say. In the future, look for our government legislating employers to pay for all our insurances: house insurance, rental insurance, car insurance, life insurance.

These evil employers have been getting away with too much for too long.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31056 Jul 5, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Such a gullible little man. Drink your kool aid, rubber ducky. Scalia and Thomas only attend those Koch Brother events for the smashing finger foods...right? Pay real close attention to how many times they side with big daddy Koch. Cha-Ching! Bought and sold like a cheap floozie.
Oh, I didn't know that. And didn't the Koch brothers buy those $20,000 Obama fundraising dinner tickets when he ran for reelection?

Oh, that's right, it wasn't the Koch brothers, it was those poor and middle-class people that attended those dinners.
xxxrayted

Maple Heights, OH

#31057 Jul 5, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
So "he started it" is what you are going with. Ever the high road.
Also, why do you call your boss "Dumbama"? How long do you suggest we listen to you cry about the big raise you never earned or your personal irresponsibility of buying cigarettes instead of easily affordable healthcare?
Finally, why did you guys forget to thank the American hero president who gave you a big tax break? Why didn't Fox News blow trumpets from the roof of the broadcasting center when Obama gave the Tea Baggers EXACTLY what they were crying for, in the form of a tax cut? It just doesn't seem very "fair and balanced". Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Just saying fair and balanced next to Fox News is so absurd it's funny.
Yeah, a tax break, huh?

You mean lowering our contributions to Social Security which is now broke and will be in the hole real soon? Those tax breaks? Thanks DumBama, we really appreciate you sinking SS even faster than it was sinking before.

Of course if we look at all the expenses cast onto the working citizens and deduct that from what we gained through those temporary tax breaks, we find we are in the hole. In fact, the median family income is down like $7,000 per year than before DumBama took office.
bunch of queers

Mountain View, CA

#31058 Jul 5, 2014
This is over 4 years old so stop posting on it retard.
You are making a idiot out off your self.gov erment retatds if u post on this old thred one more time u r queer and stupid.burn n hell
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Medina, OH

#31059 Jul 5, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
What do you think the Supreme Court is for? They are there TO judge issues based on the Constitution.
You seem to have clammed up on this one, Ray. What's the matter, you can't admit when you were wrong?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#31060 Jul 5, 2014
Pope Che Reagan Christ I wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong? That was a direct quote from the majority opinion. You are so deluded and in love with your media cites, that you have just declared that the media knows more about what a Supreme Court decision is about than the justice who wrote that opinion.
This has been a very interesting exercise.
Wrong and its you that is so delunded and in love with bigtotry that Liberalism advocates and that was the SCOTUS's website I Posted that wrote the majority opinion.
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#31061 Jul 5, 2014
Politics have gotten into SCOTUS nominations when our 'reps' started asking questions at the hearings other than the nominees knowledge of the Constitution & vetting them on their record of such knowledge.
For good or bad, we have to trust that the judges will separate their personal or religious feelings from any & all lawful feelings/knowledge.
Generally, our 'reps' already know their answers to their questions from each judges history.
The hearings are all too often a shameful political circus. But too many of our reps have no shame since they run the circus..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Xenia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 3 hr Postman7 20,984
Anyone know Matt Morrow? (Oct '15) 10 hr Darling girl 47
Leon harrison has been banned from fb 13 hr Waynedale Sucks 1
Dayton's Best Pizza? Really!? (Nov '14) 13 hr bddetro 15
Armageddon Heaven! Fri The Duke Of Hazard 1
President Trump gives us hope for budget cuts. Apr 27 wormwood 7
News Our recommendation: Springboro voters should sa... (Feb '08) Apr 25 Retired teacher 31,984

Xenia Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Xenia Mortgages