science experiment.<quoted text>
Mutt, for a person with no formal training in science, you seem very certain of your beliefs. Does it trouble you that, among those that ARE trained scientists, belief in evolution is overwhelming?
"...the scientific community considers intelligent design, a neo-creationist offshoot, to be unscientific, pseudoscience, or junk science. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences has stated that intelligent design "and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life" are not science because they cannot be tested by experiment, do not generate any predictions, and propose no new hypotheses of their own. In September 2005, 38 Nobel laureates issued a statement saying "Intelligent design is fundamentally unscientific; it cannot be tested as scientific theory because its central conclusion is based on belief in the intervention of a supernatural agent."
take a tall drinking glass and fill with ice cubes. Then fill with water to brim of glass.
when the ice melts does the glass overflow?
Your scientists said global warming will melt ice and flood all coastlines globally.
secondly.....what did water evolve from? and if you say air, then what did air evolve from?
creation is difficult to grasp, but science has not been around long enough for a valid determination of anything.
EX: you go to doctor because you are ill, but at appointment doctor winks at you when passing by due to time constraints.
you better now?