Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#26200 Feb 28, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
Mutt, for a person with no formal training in science, you seem very certain of your beliefs. Does it trouble you that, among those that ARE trained scientists, belief in evolution is overwhelming?
"...the scientific community considers intelligent design, a neo-creationist offshoot, to be unscientific, pseudoscience, or junk science. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences has stated that intelligent design "and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life" are not science because they cannot be tested by experiment, do not generate any predictions, and propose no new hypotheses of their own. In September 2005, 38 Nobel laureates issued a statement saying "Intelligent design is fundamentally unscientific; it cannot be tested as scientific theory because its central conclusion is based on belief in the intervention of a supernatural agent."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support...
science experiment.

take a tall drinking glass and fill with ice cubes. Then fill with water to brim of glass.

when the ice melts does the glass overflow?

Your scientists said global warming will melt ice and flood all coastlines globally.

secondly.....what did water evolve from? and if you say air, then what did air evolve from?

creation is difficult to grasp, but science has not been around long enough for a valid determination of anything.

EX: you go to doctor because you are ill, but at appointment doctor winks at you when passing by due to time constraints.

you better now?
mutt

Van Wert, OH

#26201 Feb 28, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
science experiment.
take a tall drinking glass and fill with ice cubes. Then fill with water to brim of glass.
when the ice melts does the glass overflow?
Your scientists said global warming will melt ice and flood all coastlines globally.
secondly.....what did water evolve from? and if you say air, then what did air evolve from?
creation is difficult to grasp, but science has not been around long enough for a valid determination of anything.
EX: you go to doctor because you are ill, but at appointment doctor winks at you when passing by due to time constraints.
you better now?
Congratulations, you chemically imbalanced psychopath. None of that was even REMOTELY relevant to the conversation at hand.
Jesus is safe now. Amen...
Canton

Canton, OH

#26202 Feb 28, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
science experiment.
take a tall drinking glass and fill with ice cubes. Then fill with water to brim of glass.
when the ice melts does the glass overflow?
Your scientists said global warming will melt ice and flood all coastlines globally.
secondly.....what did water evolve from? and if you say air, then what did air evolve from?
creation is difficult to grasp, but science has not been around long enough for a valid determination of anything.
EX: you go to doctor because you are ill, but at appointment doctor winks at you when passing by due to time constraints.
you better now?
Here's a science experiment for you. Take a hot cup of water and dump 3 or 4 ice cubes in it. Now put your hand about an inch from the mouth of the cup. Feel the cold energy being released from the ice as it melts? Now return to laughing at cold days in the winter as if it proves all climate science wrong.

Here's another "science" experiment for you. The next time you or someone you love is involved with a serious medical condition, put your faith over science again and pray them better instead of taking them to the doctors or a hospital.

You know it claims in the Bible that "God" told people to wipe out whole cities and to kill every woman and child. Go kill someone, and in this mostly Christian nation, tell the jury that "God" told you to kill. Then take a good, hard look at exactly how much faith people really have in "God's word", as they not only lock you up but deem you crazy. Who are they to question "God's" word? Good enough for the Bible you would put your hand on when they swore you in, why not good enough for the mostly Christian jury to celebrate you as doing "God's" will?
Canton

Canton, OH

#26203 Feb 28, 2014
It's because just like in the Bible, we know that anyone who would kill woman and children and then claim "God" told them to do it, is buck nutty out of their mind crazy. Now tell us some more science stories about walking on water, the dead coming back to life and talking snakes in the garden Eden...coo coo...coo coo...
Canton

Canton, OH

#26204 Feb 28, 2014
Keyboard Cat knows Jesus loves him...

mutt

Van Wert, OH

#26205 Feb 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
Keyboard Cat knows Jesus loves him...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =zfAuKF6jTqEXX
Behold, for Keyboard Cat did say unto me: "Go forth, and spread His Word across public schools nationwide. Have faith, and force it upon thine unwitting schoolchildren under the banner of science."
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#26206 Feb 28, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
Mutt, for a person with no formal training in science, you seem very certain of your beliefs. Does it trouble you that, among those that ARE trained scientists, belief in evolution is overwhelming?
Does it bother you that your theory can't be tested? Adaptability within a species isn't proof that one species morphed into another. And the typical answer of the evolutionist -- "It takes billions of years" -- is code for "This is completely unprovable, so just take our word for it".

Does it bother you that your theory defies scientific laws? Below is the link to an article written by Ker Thompson, who is a former director of the Air Force Terrestrial Sciences Laboratory. He holds a B.A. in physics and geology from the University of British Columbia and a D.Sc. in geophysics from the Colorado School of Mines. He talks about the impossibility of life beginning on the planet a la the evolutionary theory.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/isd/...
mutt

Van Wert, OH

#26207 Feb 28, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>
Does it bother you that your theory can't be tested? Adaptability within a species isn't proof that one species morphed into another. And the typical answer of the evolutionist -- "It takes billions of years" -- is code for "This is completely unprovable, so just take our word for it".
Does it bother you that your theory defies scientific laws? Below is the link to an article written by Ker Thompson, who is a former director of the Air Force Terrestrial Sciences Laboratory. He holds a B.A. in physics and geology from the University of British Columbia and a D.Sc. in geophysics from the Colorado School of Mines. He talks about the impossibility of life beginning on the planet a la the evolutionary theory.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/isd/...
Aww, lil poochie can't answer a simple question, so in typical conniving fundie teabagger fashion, he avoids it completely.
Jesus would be proud...
kjhretybbngf

Cincinnati, OH

#26208 Feb 28, 2014
boo hooooo
Canton

Canton, OH

#26209 Feb 28, 2014
mutt wrote:
<quoted text>Behold, for Keyboard Cat did say unto me: "Go forth, and spread His Word across public schools nationwide. Have faith, and force it upon thine unwitting schoolchildren under the banner of science."
So sayeth the Keyboard, thus sayeth the Cat.
mutt

Van Wert, OH

#26211 Feb 28, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet when a teacher does the exact same with global warming, that's okay.
That would be a great response, except for the simple FACT that a teacher's opinions on climate change and the idea that people should have the "religious freedom" to force their faith into taxpayer funded science classes are two completely separate issues.
Keep trying though, little trucker buddy...
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#26212 Feb 28, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
Your scientists said global warming will melt ice and flood all coastlines globally.
More than just saying it, they have been measuring it. There's no disagreement that the oceans are rising. Here's the National Geographic explaining it:

"Core samples, tide gauge readings, and, most recently, satellite measurements tell us that over the past century, the Global Mean Sea Level (GMSL) has risen by 4 to 8 inches (10 to 20 centimeters). However, the annual rate of rise over the past 20 years has been 0.13 inches (3.2 millimeters) a year, roughly twice the average speed of the preceding 80 years."

http://ocean.nationalgeographic.com/ocean/cri...
half-breed

Chillicothe, OH

#26213 Feb 28, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
More than just saying it, they have been measuring it. There's no disagreement that the oceans are rising.
It's all in your head. Obama is making the oceans recede.
Springfield er

United States

#26214 Feb 28, 2014
Who cares start a new post
Lefty

Newark, OH

#26217 Feb 28, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously the name is all you looked at and not the article which has several hyper-links in the event you doubt the source.
Typical lib: attack the messenger and not the message.
Typical lib = attack the messenger

HYPOCRITE
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#26218 Feb 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
What is the difference between Creationism and Intelligent Design? Oh that's right, the right wing Christians who try to sneak their religion into our public schools changed the word "Creator" to "Designer"..
About the same as the Dems/Progressives changing 'tax increases' to 'Revenue enhancement'
Pops

Cincinnati, OH

#26219 Feb 28, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>

Here's another "science" experiment for you. The next time you or someone you love is involved with a serious medical condition, put your faith over science again and pray them better instead of taking them to the doctors or a hospital.
As an agnostic, I couldn't agree more. Someone can handle all of the poisonous serpents that they want. WHEN one of them dies without medical aid, they must assume that that person is/was a sinner according to their own doctrine. PUTZ's
Who me

Mansfield, OH

#26221 Feb 28, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text> As an agnostic, I couldn't agree more. Someone can handle all of the poisonous serpents that they want. WHEN one of them dies without medical aid, they must assume that that person is/was a sinner according to their own doctrine. PUTZ's
Say what?

Since: Jan 13

Nicholasville, KY

#26222 Feb 28, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text> As an agnostic, I couldn't agree more. Someone can handle all of the poisonous serpents that they want. WHEN one of them dies without medical aid, they must assume that that person is/was a sinner according to their own doctrine. PUTZ's
Speaking of which that just happened recently to a preacher here in Ky, see what happens when you take a book of fairy tales literally.

Since: Jan 13

Nicholasville, KY

#26223 Feb 28, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore tells US Senate there is "no proof" humans cause climate change
Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore has angered environmentalist groups after saying climate change is "not caused by humans" and there is "no scientific proof" to back global warming alarmism.
The Canadian ecologist told US lawmakers there is "little correlation" to support a "direct causal relationship" between CO2 emissions and rising global temperatures.
"There is no scientific proof that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the dominant cause of the minor warming of the Earth's atmosphere over the past 100 years," he told a US Senate Committee "If there were such a proof, it would be written down for all to see. No actual proof, as it is understood in science, exists."
He also criticised the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for claiming "it is extremely likely" that human activity is the "dominant cause" for global warning, noting that "extremely likely" is not a scientific term.
Moore warned the statistics presented by the IPCC are not the result of mathematical calculations or statistical analysis, and may have been "invented" to support the IPCC's "expert judgement".
The Greenpeace co-founder argued the increase in atmospheric temperature on the earth's surface goes back the Ice Age when C02 was "10 times higher than today, yet human life flourished" at this time.
He added: "I realise that my comments are contrary to much of the speculation about our climate that is bandied about today.
"However, I am confident that history will bear me out, both in terms of the futility of relying on computer models to predict the future, and the fact that warmer temperatures are better than colder temperatures for most species."
Moore co-founded the environmental activist group as a PhD student in ecology in 1971. He left Greenpeace in 1986 after the group became more interested in "politics" than science.
"After 15 years in the top committee I had to leave as Greenpeace took a sharp turn to the political left, and began to adopt policies that I could not accept from my scientific perspective," he said. "Climate change was not an issue when I abandoned Greenpeace, but it certainly is now."
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/clim...
Patrick Moore is a talking head for a right wing think tank who's funding comes from Exxon mobile so I don't really take to much stock in what a sell out has to say about global warming.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Xenia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
"Amish" heaters and EdenPURE heaters--Watch OUT! (Dec '08) 20 hr Tantor 574
why do white people smell like wet dogs? (Oct '14) Thu Hey 26
"More reading than breeding would be great for ... Thu Mr Pibb 2
Does "15 Items or Less" only apply to whites? Thu Mr Pibb 5
News Our recommendation: Springboro voters should sa... (Feb '08) Feb 10 how is Babb like ... 31,903
congratulations to jamie and family! (Jun '10) Feb 10 bigdaddy 3
Our liberals ought to go over there! Feb 9 The Duke of Hazard 3
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Xenia Mortgages