Who do you support for Governor in Oh...

Since: Feb 14

Bangalore, India

#25021 Feb 4, 2014
Bangalore5 is the first exclusive Bangalore property portal dedicated to serve the apartments and gated community people in Bangalore. bangalore5, 2bhk apartment for sale in Bangalore, 2bhk apartment in Bangalore, Bangalore property.
For more:http://www.bangalore5. com
Canton

Canton, OH

#25022 Feb 4, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah right we were really doing good under Clinton when sleeze was in and do you realize Clinton is the one that laid the groundwork for the housing crisis and the mess on Wall Street and the only ones that don't notice it are the members of the entitlement society dependent on Liberalism's Wealth Redistribution and you should take a drive to Detroit and see how well it has worked out.
Do you mean "Wealth Redistribution" like this...?



At what point do you guys realize that your beliefs don't match up with the hard core numbers? You scared, paranoid visions are the agenda of a group of wealthy people who want nothing to do with people like you? You can cry all day about Obama did this or Socialist that but the facts tell us you guys are idiots and tools.
Reality Check

Van Wert, OH

#25023 Feb 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Makes you wonder how any of our ancestors survived in this country without government.
Your ancestors survived here because they used "commie wealth redistribution" and "government" to take America from the Indians. Then they told themselves that they "earned" that.
Apparently, a firm grasp on American history isn't a requirement for a career as a filthy slumlord truck driving teabagger...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#25024 Feb 4, 2014
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you mean "Wealth Redistribution" like this...?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =QPKKQnijnsMXX
At what point do you guys realize that your beliefs don't match up with the hard core numbers? You scared, paranoid visions are the agenda of a group of wealthy people who want nothing to do with people like you? You can cry all day about Obama did this or Socialist that but the facts tell us you guys are idiots and tools.
no I am talking about how the Liberals uses Government to confiscate and take from people who are working to provide for people who choose not to work and provide for themselves and those are the ones that are for wealth redistribuition.

Cartoon - Ronald Reagan on Big Government Programs

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Old Guy

Cincinnati, OH

#25025 Feb 4, 2014
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>And when Obama became pres, he had a majority in both houses.
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know. Did he? I would Google it but I don't care.
It's a complicated story. He had a Democratic "super majority" (which is what you need to get things done) for only about 6 months. He used that time to pass healthcare reform.

"Depending upon which metric is used, Democrats had a super majority for roughly six months which includes the seven weeks between Frankenís swearing-in on July 8 to Ted Kennedyís death on August 25 and the four months and nine days between Paul Kirkís swearing-in on September 25, 2009 to his replacement by Scott Brown on February 4, 2010. This was just barely enough time to pass the biggest and most difficult health care legislation in generations; an event that would likely never have happened under any other circumstances. This also happened under the onslaught of every procedural obstruction the Republicans could put in its path."

http://538refugees.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/t...
Reality Check

Van Wert, OH

#25026 Feb 4, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Roflmao, government doesn't give Wal-Mart any handout. All government can do is take less from Wal-Mart. But I'm sure you have no idea WTF I'm talking about. LOL!
Right, they just beg for huge tax breaks (handouts?) and profit by making sure that their employees stay on gubment assistance...
Face it, you're ALL for "wealth redistribution", as long as your boss and his cronies are the ones lining their pockets... LOL!
Skipper

Waverly, OH

#25027 Feb 5, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
It's a complicated story. He had a Democratic "super majority" (which is what you need to get things done) for only about 6 months. He used that time to pass healthcare reform.
"Depending upon which metric is used, Democrats had a super majority for roughly six months which includes the seven weeks between Frankenís swearing-in on July 8 to Ted Kennedyís death on August 25 and the four months and nine days between Paul Kirkís swearing-in on September 25, 2009 to his replacement by Scott Brown on February 4, 2010. This was just barely enough time to pass the biggest and most difficult health care legislation in generations; an event that would likely never have happened under any other circumstances. This also happened under the onslaught of every procedural obstruction the Republicans could put in its path."
http://538refugees.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/t...
AND THIS IS WHY THE DEMOCRATS CAN NEVER BE TRUSTED AGAIN BECAUSE THEY PUSHED THE OBMANOCARE THROUGH ON ALL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT TO HOLD ANY OFFICE.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25028 Feb 5, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>no I am talking about how the Liberals uses Government to confiscate and take from people who are working to provide for people who choose not to work and provide for themselves and those are the ones that are for wealth redistribuition.
Cartoon - Ronald Reagan on Big Government Programs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =zAFCAWNFJPgXX
If only the numbers backed up your wealthy 1% propaganda claims. You are a traitor to your own existence. There is a world of difference between the reality of 1% making 40% of all the earned income in this nation and the "socialist" nightmare you seem to fear. The wealth is most certainly being redistributed. Just the exact opposite way from what you and the corporations that provide the propaganda you repeat are telling us. The numbers are right there. Now tell us your fear driven "commie" fantasies again, but us smart Americans have already seen through it.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25029 Feb 5, 2014
Skipper wrote:
<quoted text>
AND THIS IS WHY THE DEMOCRATS CAN NEVER BE TRUSTED AGAIN BECAUSE THEY PUSHED THE OBMANOCARE THROUGH ON ALL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT TO HOLD ANY OFFICE.
Strange, because I bet you voted for the guy who helped write it. Ooops...I meant....YOU ARE A DELUSIONAL GOP LIAR WHO SHOULD BE WATER BOARDED FOR TREASON.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25030 Feb 5, 2014
Reality Check wrote:
<quoted text>Right, they just beg for huge tax breaks (handouts?) and profit by making sure that their employees stay on gubment assistance...
Face it, you're ALL for "wealth redistribution", as long as your boss and his cronies are the ones lining their pockets... LOL!
I actually know someone who works at Wal-Mart, just for the health insurance. I wonder what people would be telling Wal-Mart to go do if they had affordable health insurance elsewhere? Probably something a lot like "Shove your under paid job up your @ss". THAT is the REAL reason they don't want affordable health care for all Americans.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25031 Feb 5, 2014
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Yeah right we were really doing good under Clinton when sleeze was in and do you realize Clinton is the one that laid the groundwork for the housing crisis and the mess on Wall Street and the only ones that don't notice it are the members of the entitlement society dependent on Liberalism's Wealth Redistribution and you should take a drive to Detroit and see how well it has worked out.
That was nice of the housing market that "Clinton" destroyed, to wait until the end of Bush's 2nd term to kick in. oopsie. There's those facts again, making you look like a liar. I think the key word we should be getting from your post is the word "sleeze". A religious based moral objection in the face of the fact that Americans were better off during Clinton.
Canton

Canton, OH

#25032 Feb 5, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
It's a complicated story. He had a Democratic "super majority" (which is what you need to get things done) for only about 6 months. He used that time to pass healthcare reform.
"Depending upon which metric is used, Democrats had a super majority for roughly six months which includes the seven weeks between Frankenís swearing-in on July 8 to Ted Kennedyís death on August 25 and the four months and nine days between Paul Kirkís swearing-in on September 25, 2009 to his replacement by Scott Brown on February 4, 2010. This was just barely enough time to pass the biggest and most difficult health care legislation in generations; an event that would likely never have happened under any other circumstances. This also happened under the onslaught of every procedural obstruction the Republicans could put in its path."
http://538refugees.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/t...
Thanks Old Guy. Wouldn't want their "outrage" based on false propaganda...again.
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#25034 Feb 5, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
And how likely would it seem to you that every single dinosaur, after being the dominant life form for 135 million years, would also be dead? There are many extinct animals and plants.
Yes, there are extinct animals and plants. But like you said, every single dinosaur is gone, both large and small. Not just a few types. Was every single species incapable of surviving, or did something wipe them out?

Was every single species of hominid incapable of surviving, after having lived and multiplied for millions of years? Or was there also a catastrophic occurrence that wiped every one of them out, but miraculously avoided wiping out primates and modern man? I wonder what the odds of that would be.
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#25035 Feb 5, 2014
Old Guy wrote:
It's a complicated story. He had a Democratic "super majority" (which is what you need to get things done) for only about 6 months. He used that time to pass healthcare reform.
What the democrats actually did was gut a non-healthcare-related spending bill that had passed the House (because all spending bills must originate in the House), then they filled it with the ObamaCare legislation. It was illegal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obamacare#Legisl...

"The Senate began work on its own proposals while the House was still working on the Affordable Health Care for America Act. Instead, the Senate took up H.R. 3590, a bill regarding housing tax breaks for service members.[89] As the United States Constitution requires all revenue-related bills to originate in the House,[90] the Senate took up this bill since it was first passed by the House as a revenue-related modification to the Internal Revenue Code. The bill was then used as the Senate's vehicle for their healthcare reform proposal, completely revising the content of the bill."
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#25036 Feb 5, 2014
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Let me explain commie wealth distribution:
You and I are discussing matters on this board, and in our exchange, you tell me that you have a car for sale. By chance, I am looking for a car just like yours, and we agree to meet for a possible sale.
When we meet, you tell me that you are asking $15,000 for your car. I think the price is not only acceptable, but a great price. So I give you my $15,000, and you give me the title and car.
About three months later, you get a knock at your door. It's a Democrat politician. He tells you that he heard about our transaction, and the conversation goes like this:
Demorat politician: Ray gave you $15,000 of his money, and now he has none. We are here to take 1/3 of that money away to give back to Ray.
Van Wert: Well if Ray's not happy with the car, by all means, tell him to bring it back and I'll return his $15,000!
Democrat politician: No,no,no. You don't understand. Ray gets to keep the car, and you have to give us $5,000 so we can give that money back to Ray. You see, he concentrated his wealth to you in exchange for something he wanted. As a Democrat politician, I think it's totally unfair. So hand it over!!!!
If we are to demand wealth redistribution whereas our money that we begged the wealthy to take from us for their product or service, would it not be fair to give them their product or service back? Because what the liberals want to do to the wealthy is no different than what they wanted to do to you after my car purchase.
That's what wealth redistribution is.
Nice bag of lies, copy and pasted from a far right wing,teabag paid for with dark money foundation. There is no way that you came up with that load of crap on your own.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25037 Feb 5, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>Nice bag of lies, copy and pasted from a far right wing,teabag paid for with dark money foundation. There is no way that you came up with that load of crap on your own.
you are a joke

calling the post you responded to as a bag of lies is proof of your drunken stupor of liberal kook aide.

enjoy your buzz....it is going to be short lived and erased.
woo-boy

Waverly, OH

#25038 Feb 5, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
you are a joke
calling the post you responded to as a bag of lies is proof of your drunken stupor of liberal kook aide.
enjoy your buzz....it is going to be short lived and erased.
I'm a joke? I'm not the one who admitted to sleeping with mommy. That's just sick. Well geez, look at the source. Looks like the way you reply to everything points at you being in a constant drunken stupor. Or is it drugs?
mutt

Chillicothe, OH

#25039 Feb 5, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
Oh yeah mutt:
New SCIENTIFIC findings just released in the past few days show that the DNA in Neanderthals exist in today's modern mans DNA. Disprove them with a real argument and facts.
What, exactly, are the differences between "modern" man and Neanderthals? Take a look at this article:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/modern-humans-mor...

The opinions about so-called Neanderthals appear to be fabricated.

And as for dating methods, those are completely unreliable. Here's an interesting article about dating:
http://www.examiner.com/article/radiometric-d...

".... not only is the nature of Java Man unsettled, but so is its age. All that anyone can say for certain is that it is no older than the earth itself. Such discrepancies are, furthermore, much more common than supposed, and illustrate the folly of trying to date a past event without the testimony of unimpeachable witnesses."

That confirms what I told Old Guy about the ice core samples. Without documentation at the time, it's impossible to say how old anything is. There are too many variables that may have affected the samples, plus we don't know how accurate our methods are.
Reality Speaks

Columbus, OH

#25040 Feb 5, 2014
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>I'm a joke? I'm not the one who admitted to sleeping with mommy. That's just sick. Well geez, look at the source. Looks like the way you reply to everything points at you being in a constant drunken stupor. Or is it drugs?
your stupidity and total lack of substance is showing again.

if you aren't spinning, you aren't typing
Pope Che Reagan Christ I

Lodi, OH

#25041 Feb 5, 2014
Reality Speaks wrote:
<quoted text>
your stupidity and total lack of substance is showing again.
if you aren't spinning, you aren't typing
You've been so boring the last couple days. Tell us more about how Obama had less votes in 2012 than McCain had in 2008 or something equally silly again. That's when you are fun.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Xenia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 1 hr Oh well 20,085
Why did white liberals let the Salem Mall die? 4 hr The Duke of Hazard 1
Dayton's Best Pizza? Really!? (Nov '14) 7 hr Mama larosa 14
Va girl 11 hr Blu sky 1
We hope Republicans are not serious! Sun The Old Cold Warrior 2
sexting Sun Sma 6
Anyone know John Vlahos? Aug 1 Sos 3
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Xenia Mortgages