Who do you support for Governor in Oh...
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#22101 Nov 15, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush Sr's New World Order, hand and hand with the United Nations and his Soviet Comrades. Pinko sumpreme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =byxeOG_pZ1oXX
GW's unpaid Medicare expansion...commie time
Besides...NOTHING Obama has done, despite the many proven to be bogus attempts of fake scandals, comes even close to the torture camps and lies to Congress about WMDs at the cost of our American soldiers that you sat silent through under GW Bush. Not a peep from you as he ignored if not trampled on the Constitution with the patriot act. Now we are supposed to buy your sudden concern about hidden commies that no one who isn't signed up for the Tea Bagger newsletters can see? Now, after what you supported for 8 solid years, we are supposed to believe you are so concerned about the constitution? Give it a rest. It's because he's black, although just like all the people who voted for Bush twice, somehow all the racists in our country magically disappeared when Obama got elected. Sure they did.
What torture camps do you speak of here?

What did Bush lie about and please provide proof that he did lie.

Who ruled anything Bush did as unconstitutional besides a bunch of left-wing kooks?

Why do we still have the Patriot Act today as we've had for the last five years of DumBama's presidency? Why do we have an even stronger TSA? NSA?

What your lying politicians fail to tell you is that Bush was right all along.

Yeah, we hate DumBama because he's black and not because he's destroying our country. Ask the hundreds of thousands that already lost their job or the millions that lost their healthcare plan. Ask them if they hate DumBama because he's black.

That old rag doesn't wash anymore. Nobody even pays attention to it. It's like the boy that cried wolf.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#22102 Nov 15, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee, you mean out of the two candidates, the commies chose Obama over Romney? What a surprise. That must mean every Democrat is a communist. Now when you say "gun grab", what planet did this happen on? Go ahead and show us a link where Obama was going to grab all of your guns. Unless of course it never happened and was yet another propaganda based rightwing scare tactic. Are you talking about the common sense notion that maybe everyone doesn't need an AK-47 with a hundred round drum clip for "home defense" or "sporting"? Is THAT what you are calling Obama taking away all our guns? Now when you guys were crying about the end of the world back in Clinton's weapon ban, I legally purchased a Colt A-15. Was THAT the big gun grab? Has "the gun grab" EVER happened like what you guys cry about all the time? Nope. Just like commies in our government that nobody can name...all just Tea Bagger pipe dreams to muddy the waters on corporations taking over our country.
Also, I think if you Google Bush Socialism or Reagan Socialism it will save me the time of explaining documented historical facts to you. I supposed "trickle down" wasn't any form of class warfare in your world...right? It's OK to take from the middle class and give to the rich, but anything else is "class warfare".
Who took from the middle-class and gave it to the rich? How was that accomplished? I'm middle-class and was working during the Reagan administration. I don't recall ever being taxed to give to the rich. Like most working adults during that time, I was in much better shape financially than before Reagan got in.

As far as DumBama is concerned, take note of "attempted" gun grab. Meaning that he knew he had no chance at it. If we had an all Democrat government and a majority in the SC, only the criminals would have guns today. Now, would you like me to post articles on what the Democrats wanted to see happen to guns in America if they had their way? I have plenty of articles I can post.
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#22103 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>If you can't see the constant bigoted, racist and prejudice rants that keep coming from mainly 2 paranoid posters along with 1 that constantly threatens people (ooh, big bad keyboard warrior) was the point that was being poked at. It's in just about every one of their posts. Or, do you just overlook that.
I have to agree with the valid points in this post. There are some mean,'personal attacks only' posters on here.
They are why I have had less to say lately. I understand your explanation.
Canton

Canton, OH

#22104 Nov 15, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
So what's your point with this link? It only proves me correct.
Now lets see what the goal of the TP is and how it relates to fascism:
What are the Objectives of the American Tea Party Movement?
Learn about the core values of the American Tea Party Movement, what its goals are and its philosophy about the proper role of the federal government.
Tea Party Movement Supports Fiscal Responsibility
Tea Party Movement Supports Limited Government
Tea Party Movement Supports Free Markets
Mission of the Tea Party Movement
According to the Tea Party's mission statement page, the movement's core values are based on the United States' Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as explained in the Federalist Papers. The observance by the government of those core values of fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government and free markets are critical to the security and personal and economic liberties of all U.S. citizens.
What appears to lead and inspire participants involved in the American Tea Party Movement is the concept that "there exists an inherent benefit to our country when private property and prosperity are secured by natural law and the rights of the individual."
http://suite101.com/a/what-are-the-objectives...
What a bunch of fascists, huh???
So why is the Tea Party overwhelmingly pro-life and against gay marriage? Why is Sarah Palin standing in front of her church and telling them it's "God's will" to get a pipeline built? Do those things go along with what the Tea Party stands for? Here's what the rightwing Christian Conservative Republicans that call themselves the Tea Party really stand for...

http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#22105 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
GOP ACA amendments;
There were 788 amendments filed to modify Obamacare.
67 were from Democrats-and 721 were from Republicans.
197 amendments were passed-36 from Dems. and 161 from Reps.
Of the 161 Reps. amendments. Senate Reps classified 29 as substansive and 132 as technical.
So much for the claims of not having anything to do with it.
Ah, but the simple fact that they passed had to take a bipartisian vote shows the value & agreement of both parties,
Canton

Canton, OH

#22106 Nov 15, 2013
Dominionism. Theocracy. That's what the Tea Party is really about. Let me guess. The reason they are teaching creationism in the science classes of the rightwing conservative run K12 online learning program is because they just want lower taxes. The reason why they push anti-climate change propaganda in the same rightwing owned online public school, even though it goes directly against what 97% of the scientific world believes, is because they just want to uphold the constitution...right?
Canton

Canton, OH

#22107 Nov 15, 2013
Now when those same "Patriots" were voting in Bush Sr., who was a big boy in the CIA, was THAT your definition of smaller government?
Canton

Canton, OH

#22108 Nov 15, 2013
xxxrayted wrote:
<quoted text>
Who took from the middle-class and gave it to the rich? How was that accomplished? I'm middle-class and was working during the Reagan administration. I don't recall ever being taxed to give to the rich. Like most working adults during that time, I was in much better shape financially than before Reagan got in.
As far as DumBama is concerned, take note of "attempted" gun grab. Meaning that he knew he had no chance at it. If we had an all Democrat government and a majority in the SC, only the criminals would have guns today. Now, would you like me to post articles on what the Democrats wanted to see happen to guns in America if they had their way? I have plenty of articles I can post.
Giving huge tax breaks to the wealthy while the middle class was sinking and then telling us that it will "trickle down" worked out for you under Reagan? Did it all that money "trickle" down? Let's have a look at the CEO flow growing exponentially while the middle class flat lined for the answer to that. I made way more money under Clinton than I did under any GOP president.
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#22109 Nov 15, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Your valiant fight for the Constitution would sound oh so sincere if it wasn't for the fact that your team was waving flags with Bibles in hand when the most unconstitutional act in the history of this country took place. It's called the Patriot Act. It came from the same guy who had secret torture camps. You know, real "only party with morals" kinda stuff.
IF YOU weren't so busy being mean & an idiot,(make that a mean idiot) you would realize that both paties of congress voted for that act. I believe that it passed cleanly & was renewed again later. Name calling Putz.
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#22110 Nov 15, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Your valiant fight for the Constitution would sound oh so sincere if it wasn't for the fact that your team was waving flags with Bibles in hand when the most unconstitutional act in the history of this country took place. It's called the Patriot Act. It came from the same guy who had secret torture camps. You know, real "only party with morals" kinda stuff.
But I do agree that the Patriot Act IS unconstitutional.
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#22111 Nov 15, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I have to agree with the valid points in this post. There are some mean,'personal attacks only' posters on here.
They are why I have had less to say lately. I understand your explanation.
To Canton. You are such a $hit stirrer. You 'judged' this post as, incendiary, racy & clueless & simply provide even more evidence of lower life forms & lower levels of intelligence. Congratulations on that success!
Hey Canton

Delphos, OH

#22112 Nov 15, 2013
Is that your head i see popping up and down from the presidents desk? Awww... it is... just another one drinking his cool-aide...
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#22113 Nov 15, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>I have to agree with the valid points in this post. There are some mean,'personal attacks only' posters on here.
They are why I have had less to say lately. I understand your explanation.
That's why when I see a onesided, hateful, won't even bother to look at the middle and check things out posts, I just have to jerk on their chain.
OLFARTT

Dayton, OH

#22114 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>That's why when I see a onesided, hateful, won't even bother to look at the middle and check things out posts, I just have to jerk on their chain.
YOU'RE JERKIN' TOO MUCH, AND TOO OFTEN THERE, POO POO BOY.
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#22115 Nov 15, 2013
OLFARTT wrote:
<quoted text>YOU'RE JERKIN' TOO MUCH, AND TOO OFTEN THERE, POO POO BOY.
Look out folks, we got a loony toony troll on board. A true racist and bigoted bible thumper that's dumber than a box of rock's. Well, he'll fit right in with some posters.
woo-boy

Van Wert, OH

#22116 Nov 15, 2013
Pops wrote:
<quoted text>Ah, but the simple fact that they passed had to take a bipartisian vote shows the value & agreement of both parties,
But it seems like Congress is filled with psuedo-populist yahoos who wave bibles at $25,000 a year earners while they do the bidding of $25,000 a day earners
Republican Says

Lima, OH

#22117 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>Look out folks, we got a loony toony troll on board. A true racist and bigoted bible thumper that's dumber than a box of rock's. Well, he'll fit right in with some posters.
Maybe OLFARTT and Reality Speaks could get together, complain about invisible commies and uva rings, talk about their favorite pink farm trucks, then dip their ballsacks into each others mouths fer corporate freedom.
O My

Delphos, OH

#22118 Nov 15, 2013
Now that is funny!!
Pops

Fort Thomas, KY

#22119 Nov 15, 2013
woo-boy wrote:
<quoted text>But it seems like Congress is filled with psuedo-populist yahoos who wave bibles at $25,000 a year earners while they do the bidding of $25,000 a day earners
Congress is full of prostitutes that mostly care about 'performing' for the highest bidder(s).
Most forget WHO voted them in & just keep talking the stuff while their hands are doing something else.
I am somewhat amazed that any of them wonder why & how lawyers, politicians & used car salespeople have the reputations that they have & that jokes are made of them. History has proven the reasons for all 3 of them being the butt of jokes.
xxxrayted

Brook Park, OH

#22120 Nov 16, 2013
Canton wrote:
<quoted text>
Giving huge tax breaks to the wealthy while the middle class was sinking and then telling us that it will "trickle down" worked out for you under Reagan? Did it all that money "trickle" down? Let's have a look at the CEO flow growing exponentially while the middle class flat lined for the answer to that. I made way more money under Clinton than I did under any GOP president.
That's because Clinton presided with a Republican led Congress that balanced the budget, cut government and pushed Clinton to cut taxes for those wealthy people. It even led to a so-called surplus...... at least on paper.

Where to you leftists get this notion that when somebody makes a lot of money, they have to get that money from lower wage people? You've been brainwashed, do you even realize that?

Our economy is not a bubble. We are not encapsulated. Tell me, if we increased taxes 20% on rich people, how does that change your life? Does it buy you one more loaf of bread? Do you think that you'll make more money because the wealthy are taxed at a higher rate? Explain how that all works in your mind. OBummer got his tax on the wealthy. How much better have you done since then?

When I go to my employer asking for a raise, and he tells me he'd love to give me one, but he doesn't have the money because the rich have it all, then your theory would make sense. But in my entire life, I've never had an employer tell me that.

This is what I call financial envy. People are not given money. They work hard for it just like anybody else. They take risks opening up their own business, investing in education, or they invest their money in stocks, real estate or the commodities market. Have you ever done any of these things?

Of course you haven't. The other week you were on here bragging about sitting in front of your 70" television. That's not sacrificing much now is it? Well people who are trying to become wealthy don't buy 70" televisions. They make a lot of sacrifices and do without. They would take that television money and save or invest it.

"Liberals believe that if you earn money, you are not entitled to it, but if you want money, you are."
Ken Blackwell

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Xenia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
SUH Dude 3 hr NoWay 2
People Are Saying... 3 hr SuhDude 22
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 18 hr Hipocrit 20,505
"Amish" heaters and EdenPURE heaters--Watch OUT! (Dec '08) 20 hr Eddie 576
Winnie Peacock 22 hr Jenny From The Block 1
News Ridgeville Christian, Dayton Christian merging (Jun '07) Fri Ridgeville Lion 34
Chris Mulcahy Fri Sunny 18

Xenia Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Xenia Mortgages