Our recommendation: Springboro voters...

Our recommendation: Springboro voters should say 'yes' the first time to school levies

There are 31964 comments on the Dayton Daily News story from Feb 5, 2008, titled Our recommendation: Springboro voters should say 'yes' the first time to school levies. In it, Dayton Daily News reports that:

Recommended local sites More... UD sports info, pictures and discussions Are you a UD sports fan? Whether you like basketball, volleyball, soccer, men's or women's teams -- Doesn't matter -- this site is for ... via Dayton Daily News

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Dayton Daily News.

And There Is More

Springfield, OH

#31165 Apr 11, 2014
suckers wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I'm certainly not denying that.
However, last November 5th, who in this community could've made a prediction that six months later, Boro's students might be manipulated / used by the board's president in order to bolster internet exposure for their business?
In casting a ballot for Anderson, I'm willing to admit that I made a mistake.
How about YOU?
Who in this community could have predicted that just three months after Anderson was sworn into office, swearing to protect our Constitution, that he would lead our school district to reward a teacher that broke student privacy laws? But that's exactly what happened in the board room, under the leadership of Anderson/Petrey on April 3, 2014, when union classroom teacher (and family member of the politically-influential CC Township Trustee Wade) was awarded a supplemental teaching contract as mentor to our students!

Guess Anderson was so focused on counting the Likes for his funeral home website that Petrey forget to mention that Molly Wray used protected private student information for personal use last August. Favorite union classroom teacher, Molly Wray got a letter of understanding placed in her file, and instead of being suspended for her actions, she is protected by the union employment security plan, and rewarded for bad behavior?
And There Is More

Springfield, OH

#31166 Apr 11, 2014
Check out the Board of Education Meeting on the school webstie for the record of File Attachments Personnel.pdf

Subject
5.3 Approval of Personnel Items
Meeting
Apr 3, 2014 - SPRINGBORO BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING
Category
5. Director of Human Resources Report
Type
Action
Recommended Action
Request: Approval of Personnel Items
File Attachments
Personnel.pdf (95 KB)
Motion & Voting
Request: Approval of Personnel Items

Motion by David F Petroni, second by Ron Malone.
Final Resolution: Motion Carries
Yea: Charles Anderson, Ron Malone, David F Petroni, Jim N Rigano, Dave Stuckey
truth to power

Springfield, OH

#31167 Apr 12, 2014
And There Is More wrote:
<quoted text>
Who in this community could have predicted that just three months after Anderson was sworn into office, swearing to protect our Constitution, that he would lead our school district to reward a teacher that broke student privacy laws? But that's exactly what happened in the board room, under the leadership of Anderson/Petrey on April 3, 2014, when union classroom teacher (and family member of the politically-influential CC Township Trustee Wade) was awarded a supplemental teaching contract as mentor to our students!
Guess Anderson was so focused on counting the Likes for his funeral home website that Petrey forget to mention that Molly Wray used protected private student information for personal use last August. Favorite union classroom teacher, Molly Wray got a letter of understanding placed in her file, and instead of being suspended for her actions, she is protected by the union employment security plan, and rewarded for bad behavior?
What's the reason Ron Malone is next to useless on this BOE?
Because Malone was selected not because of his platform, but rather because Ron's everybody's best pal; he's "insanely popular". But how effective can such a popuality contest winner be if Malone continues to insist on wearing blinders as to our students' educational priorities?

Why is Charles Anderson ineffective on the BOE?
Because his actions over the last six months have proven Anderson's there not so much to support Boro's schools and our students. On the contrary, evidence of the past few months has added creedence to Charles Anderson, himself, being the primary reason Charles Anderson pursued candidacy for the Springboro school board.

This community should demand a recall of these two!
You Betcha

Springfield, OH

#31168 Apr 12, 2014
truth to power wrote:
<quoted text>
What's the reason Ron Malone is next to useless on this BOE?
Because Malone was selected not because of his platform, but rather because Ron's everybody's best pal; he's "insanely popular". But how effective can such a popuality contest winner be if Malone continues to insist on wearing blinders as to our students' educational priorities?
Why is Charles Anderson ineffective on the BOE?
Because his actions over the last six months have proven Anderson's there not so much to support Boro's schools and our students. On the contrary, evidence of the past few months has added creedence to Charles Anderson, himself, being the primary reason Charles Anderson pursued candidacy for the Springboro school board.
This community should demand a recall of these two!
Wouldn't it be great IF elected officials could be "recalled" just like our automobiles are recalled, once the public learns their "services" are doing harm to others, in best interest only of financial gain for their "business" profits?

Our Public Schools are Springboro's biggest business; but under the leadership of community business man, Charles Anderson, only he and the SEA staff appear to be making a Profit, on the backs of Springboro Taxpayers, and to the detriment of our Springboro students.
Doug Wiedeman

Cleveland, OH

#31169 Apr 14, 2014
Answer wrote:
<quoted text>
Previous post
"There has been 2 crimes committed in connection to Mollygate...
1) Molly Wray's violation of state and Federal student privacy laws
2) Springboro Schools administration not suspending Molly Wray
__________
The following is a slice of a Springboro schools document which is available to the general public...
"...Ms. Wray unfortunately decided to use protected student information under R.C.ยง3319.321 and FERPA 20 USC 1232g for personal use. The Administration of the Springboro Community City School District discussed this matter with Ms. Wray and disciplined Ms. Wray in the matter they believed was appropriate..."
Terrah Floyd, Treasurer
Springboro Community City Schools
______
So what was the manner of discipline Todd Petrey and Lee Vincent believed was "appropriate" for Molly Wray's violation of state and federal student privacy laws? A verbal lecture and a "letter of understanding" in Molly Wray's personnel file, to be removed after six months? For a flagrant offense involving a health teacher who lured recent Boro alumni to go to her personal website by informing them about a.... "really important election for the school board".... only to have web-browsers discover her personal endorsement of Malone Stuckey & Anderson....... UNBELIEVABLE!
I requested a copy of Ms Wray's personnel file, as well as all other files pertaining to her employment with the district, and found nothing in its content regarding this incident.
white washed

Springfield, OH

#31170 Apr 14, 2014
Doug Wiedeman wrote:
<quoted text>
I requested a copy of Ms Wray's personnel file, as well as all other files pertaining to her employment with the district, and found nothing in its content regarding this incident.
So Doug, if I may ask, which of the following emotions did you experience when you saw a copy of Molly Wray personnel file ...minus the "letter of understanding" ?

A) Surprise
B) Anger
C) Disgust
D) All of the above
sherlock

Fairborn, OH

#31171 Apr 14, 2014
Doug Wiedeman wrote:
<quoted text>
I requested a copy of Ms Wray's personnel file, as well as all other files pertaining to her employment with the district, and found nothing in its content regarding this incident.
how do you spell cover-up ?
pub record

Springboro, OH

#31172 Apr 14, 2014
Doug Wiedeman wrote:
<quoted text>
I requested a copy of Ms Wray's personnel file, as well as all other files pertaining to her employment with the district, and found nothing in its content regarding this incident.
Aren't you one of the ones on this blog that was bemoaning all the public record requests from the MSA supporters previous to January 1 and now you are doing the same?

Let the hypocrisy continue....
pub record

Springboro, OH

#31173 Apr 14, 2014
sherlock wrote:
<quoted text>
how do you spell cover-up ?
Its difficult to cover something up when it has already been made public...Sherlock.
Water un Troubled Bridges

Springfield, OH

#31175 Apr 14, 2014
pub record wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you one of the ones on this blog that was bemoaning all the public record requests from the MSA supporters previous to January 1 and now you are doing the same?
Let the hypocrisy continue....
Between these separate scenarios, what factor makes the key difference? Springboro Community City Schools' administration is dominated by former educators who predominately lean extemely hard to the Left. Malone and Stuckey, especially, lean extremely hard to the Left. If liberals are really good at one thing they're really good at covering the backs of their fellow liberals.

I've got a bridge to sell you if you honestly believe Boro's superintendent and HR mgr, in any effective way, imposed discipline on Molly Wray for her violation of student privacy laws.

I've got a 2nd bridge to sell you if you believe Boro's superintendent & HR mgr's letter of understanding (which apparently no longer exists in Wray's file) set any sort of effective precedent for helping to curtail student information privacy breaches in the future.
hopeful

Fairborn, OH

#31177 Apr 15, 2014
Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
And I have a bridge to sell you, if you think anyone gives a rats behind what you think and post.
sounds like Jobe is at it again..LOL, right Sarah ?
right back atcha

Springfield, OH

#31178 Apr 15, 2014
Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
And I have a bridge to sell you, if you think anyone gives a rats behind what you think and post.
don't need a bridge; and why does anyone think that wasting $12,000 of taxpayers money for Petrey's community engagement program can "sell" the values of beliefs in this school district that "we need a new levy tax increase" just because our community of unionism thinks our professional educators are wonderful?
Water un Troubled Bridges

Springfield, OH

#31179 Apr 15, 2014
Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
And I have a bridge to sell you, if you think anyone gives a rats behind what you think and post.
PRICELESS !!

Ad hominem attacks like this are what many pro-union liberals lower themselves to when they lack an ability to conjur a debate counterpoint.
Just Asking

Springfield, OH

#31182 Apr 16, 2014
Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you just can't HANDLE the truth
Are those Bridges comments for S-U-R-E?
Just Asking

Springfield, OH

#31183 Apr 16, 2014
Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
And I have a bridge to sell you, if you think anyone gives a rats behind what you think and post.
Are these Bridges comments for S-U-R-E?
hopeful

Fairborn, OH

#31184 Apr 16, 2014
Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you just can't HANDLE the truth
no...can't handle rudeness that you, Jobe, are so well known for.
Precisely Watson

Dayton, OH

#31185 Apr 16, 2014
Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you just can't HANDLE the truth
Oh, please enlighten us poor idiots. What is the truth??
Just Asking

Springfield, OH

#31186 Apr 16, 2014
Precisely Watson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, please enlighten us poor idiots. What is the truth??
Isn't it proven that for S-U-R-E, Truth is nothing more than the collective argument of False Evidence Appearing Real?
Did You Know

Springfield, OH

#31187 Apr 16, 2014
Water un Troubled Bridges wrote:
<quoted text>
PRICELESS !!
Ad hominem attacks like this are what many pro-union liberals lower themselves to when they lack an ability to conjur a debate counterpoint.
Did you know that lots of people have thought for several years that this politics of personal destruction against good Springboro citizens, launched by the community of unionism, was all about the money? Now we know there is much greater harm intended than just controlling our money.........

Now we know that it is really all about union POWER to discredit, distort, and intimidate all citizens who exercise our constitution rights of free speech and individual beliefs, into collective silence, for fear of retaliation from the mighty machine of Ohio's forced unionism party of politics.
truth to power

Springfield, OH

#31188 Apr 16, 2014
Did You Know wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you know that lots of people have thought for several years that this politics of personal destruction against good Springboro citizens, launched by the community of unionism, was all about the money? Now we know there is much greater harm intended than just controlling our money.........
Now we know that it is really all about union POWER to discredit, distort, and intimidate all citizens who exercise our constitution rights of free speech and individual beliefs, into collective silence, for fear of retaliation from the mighty machine of Ohio's forced unionism party of politics.
Sure, it's always been about money. However, the stakes have since been raised. Now it's about mind control too. Our new board majority fully understands that if they can successfully program Boro's young minds, the SEA will achieve financial stability for decades to come.

Liberals in Springboro want to win in the long term by trying to steer the future direction of BOE elections. They know that the more young minds they "win over" to self-serving liberal- socialist beliefs, the more likely that more liberals will be elected to the BOE in the future.

Indoctrination of the next generation of Boro voters began with our former high school principal using his popularity as a proverbial foot-in-the-door in order to twist and distort high school students' minds in believing Obama's style of liberal-socialism has something to do with the American Way. What's the sad part? Many students are likely to follow in-step with our former high school principal,.not because of anything he believes or says regarding theirs or the district's future, but merely because he has been and remains "INSANELY POPULAR".

Unfortunately, students aren't the only ones who are being led up a creek without a paddle. Last November, approximately 80% of adult voters in Springboro were fooled out of their shoes.

Like now, more liberals on the BOE in the future will mean continued pilfering of hard earned tax dollars because of spending orgies over anything and everything that will be presented in Jeff Stec's "10-year vision". To get an update regarding progress of district liberals' indoctrination of Boro students, contact S. Bindemann. Re: "Student Mentor" program.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Xenia Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Will CBS cancel "Madame Secretary" now? 35 min Fan of Leon The Man 1
Donald Trump NEVER gave a blank check to a cont... 1 hr Fan of Leon The Man 1
"Trump-hating deranged will not change" 1 hr The Old Cold Warrior 4
My friends, we and President Tump... 1 hr The Old Cold Warrior 3
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 13 hr Wheelz 20,703
why do white people smell like wet dogs? (Oct '14) 22 hr GrowUp 54
Ladies, here is your romantic chance! Dec 2 Literature Lover 7

Xenia Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Xenia Mortgages