Saddest Day In American History
Posted in the Wylie Forum
#1 Jun 6, 2007
Most immigrants still come from a handful of countries; Kennedy simply changed which countries those would be. In 2005, according to the Department of Homeland Security, the overwhelming majority of immigrants came from only 10 countries, none of which had sent a lot of immigrants to America for the country's first 200 years: Mexico (161,445), India (84,681), China (69,967), the Philippines (60,748), Cuba (36,261), Vietnam (32,784), the Dominican Republic (27,504), Korea (26,562), Colombia (25,571) and Ukraine (22,761).
In 1960, whites were 90 percent of the country. The Census Bureau recently estimated that whites already account for less than two-thirds of the population and will be a minority by 2050. Other estimates put that day much sooner.
One may assume the new majority will not be such compassionate overlords as the white majority has been. If this sort of drastic change were legally imposed on any group other than white Americans, it would be called genocide. Yet whites are called racists merely for mentioning the fact current immigration law is intentionally designed to reduce their percentage in the population.
We needed to have "more discussion" about Iraq for nearly two years before finally invading. When will we be allowed to begin discussion of a government policy enacted by stealth 40 years ago specifically intended to decimate one particular ethnic group in our own country?
If liberals think Iraqis are genetically incapable of pulling off even the most rudimentary form of democracy, why do they believe 50 million Mexicans will magically become good Americans, imbued in the nation's history and culture, upon crossing the Rio Grande? Maybe we should dunk Iraqis in the Rio and see what happens.
And as long as we're adopting an open-borders policy for immigration, how about opening the borders for emigration? As it stands, anyone can come in and start plotting terrorist attacks or collecting government services right away. But the rest of us can never escape having to pay for it.
You can leave the country, you can renounce your citizenship but you still owe taxes for 10 years. The government does not allow us to stop supporting welfare recipients in America, millions more of whom it plans to import under Bush's bill. That's not a free market it's a roach motel.
If these free-marketeers at the Wall Street Journal want the free movement of people, how about letting us freely leave after they've wrecked the country?
In Samuel P. Huntington's book "Who Are We? The Challenges to America's National Identity," he asks: "Would America be the America it is today if in the 17th and 18th centuries it had been settled not by British Protestants but by French, Spanish or Portuguese Catholics? The answer is no. It would not be America; it would be Quebec, Mexico or Brazil."
I don't want to live in Mexico, Quebec or Brazil. But now I guess I have no choice, since "open borders" means I can never leave.
#2 Jun 22, 2007
I have a question, has anyone ever read mexicos constitution. To be short it says all jobs go to mexican citizens first, all people who are caught in the mexican country will be immediatly deported no questions asked, we will arm yes i said arm our southern border to prevent the entering of illegals from south america. Now does that sound fair to south americans trying to make a living. No it doesnt, but we cant do the the same without whiny ass george bush and the stinkin ass whiny mexicans throughing a protest.
Add your comments below
|Cooper Junior High ( Coach Adams ) (May '15)||Feb 14||WHS||2|
|Kraft's salad dressing fix: Shake up well (Feb '08)||Jan '17||Toby||54|
|Ex-officer admits several scams (Dec '06)||Jan '17||Victim||175|
|Loan Sharks||Dec '16||wondering||2|
|Sachse Assistant Principal Arrested For DUI.......||Dec '16||CatsEye45||2|
|Garland Soccer (Mar '15)||Dec '16||Soapboxmom||43|
Find what you want!
Search Wylie Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC