Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane announces $484,000 recovered as...

Nov 18, 2013 Full story: Bradford Today

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane today announced Pennsylvania will receive $484,000 as a result of a settlement her office reached with Google Inc. for circumventing Safari privacy settings.

Full Story
lady

Columbia, PA

#1 Nov 19, 2013
Is that why your not doing anything else with your time Kane? To busy chasing money?
Your worried about alleged privacy yet fail to act on other more important issues.
It's clear what your intention and interests are.
Hope the people can do something about next term.
So how much of the alleged "recovery" money will you recieve???
I'm sure it was worth your "persuing" in that respect.
Do you ever plan on finishing up with the Corbett investigation now that your done with your "recovery" task? Or would that cost to much? Or is it the fact that his term is soon ending? I'm willing to bet he will still get back in the "seat" but who would know it's not like the votes are public. Funny how everything else is "right to know" but when it comes to our own votes for the government you don't have that right. The public when they are serving as a juror doesn't have "privacy" rights so why be hush hush about the important process of putting people in office that the people probably never voted for anyway?
here's a scam to investigate: In order to be a candidate for a person in Kane's position and any elected "seat" one must meet certain assnign requirements to be eligable such as money education ect. This ensures that only a privelaged few have the right to represent and run our country. Why not grant equal opportunity to every person who is willing to do the job. Also Governement officials aside from the other benefits they get (free gas lunch ect) should be paid min. wage if at all.
It is a corrupt system that officials don't want to change because they benefit it.
Judges do not have to rule according to law. It is at their individual discretion how they "interpret" and apply such said laws. So if they rule according to there own interests against the law what's it to them?? Nothing! Even if someone is lucky enough to have the supreme court rule in there favor after the lower courts wouldn't the judge suffers no consequence. There should be a law that states if any judge ignores the law in ruling they are to be held accountable for the litigation of the party seeking justice. It may not prevent it all together but perhaps it would keep some of it from happening. Our system is messed up but most people don't have the guts to change it.
Some things need to be changed. Just like when things were changed for slavery so too must the other inhumane laws and systems be changed.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wrightsville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
PA Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania... (Oct '10) 12 hr Ed Swindell 51,527
PA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Pennsylva... (Oct '10) 18 hr Skip Intel - Blam... 4,021
PA Who do you support for Lieutenant Governor in P... (Oct '10) Mon R Nixon 186
Crime Watch for 07/01/2010 (Jul '10) Aug '14 hpf 2
Weis proposes to sell beer in Ephrata store Jul '14 Ephrata mom 1
Moving to Columbia Jul '14 Information 2
Suburban Life: Towns band together to share lov... Jul '14 Black dude 1
Wrightsville Dating

more search filters

less search filters

Wrightsville Jobs

Wrightsville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Wrightsville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Wrightsville

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]