Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane announces $484,000 recovered as...
Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen G. Kane today announced Pennsylvania will receive $484,000 as a result of a settlement her office reached with Google Inc. for circumventing Safari privacy settings.Full Story
#1 Nov 19, 2013
Is that why your not doing anything else with your time Kane? To busy chasing money?
Your worried about alleged privacy yet fail to act on other more important issues.
It's clear what your intention and interests are.
Hope the people can do something about next term.
So how much of the alleged "recovery" money will you recieve???
I'm sure it was worth your "persuing" in that respect.
Do you ever plan on finishing up with the Corbett investigation now that your done with your "recovery" task? Or would that cost to much? Or is it the fact that his term is soon ending? I'm willing to bet he will still get back in the "seat" but who would know it's not like the votes are public. Funny how everything else is "right to know" but when it comes to our own votes for the government you don't have that right. The public when they are serving as a juror doesn't have "privacy" rights so why be hush hush about the important process of putting people in office that the people probably never voted for anyway?
here's a scam to investigate: In order to be a candidate for a person in Kane's position and any elected "seat" one must meet certain assnign requirements to be eligable such as money education ect. This ensures that only a privelaged few have the right to represent and run our country. Why not grant equal opportunity to every person who is willing to do the job. Also Governement officials aside from the other benefits they get (free gas lunch ect) should be paid min. wage if at all.
It is a corrupt system that officials don't want to change because they benefit it.
Judges do not have to rule according to law. It is at their individual discretion how they "interpret" and apply such said laws. So if they rule according to there own interests against the law what's it to them?? Nothing! Even if someone is lucky enough to have the supreme court rule in there favor after the lower courts wouldn't the judge suffers no consequence. There should be a law that states if any judge ignores the law in ruling they are to be held accountable for the litigation of the party seeking justice. It may not prevent it all together but perhaps it would keep some of it from happening. Our system is messed up but most people don't have the guts to change it.
Some things need to be changed. Just like when things were changed for slavery so too must the other inhumane laws and systems be changed.
Add your comments below
|PA Who do you support for Governor in Pennsylvania... (Oct '10)||12 hr||Ed Swindell||51,527|
|PA Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Pennsylva... (Oct '10)||18 hr||Skip Intel - Blam...||4,021|
|PA Who do you support for Lieutenant Governor in P... (Oct '10)||Mon||R Nixon||186|
|Crime Watch for 07/01/2010 (Jul '10)||Aug '14||hpf||2|
|Weis proposes to sell beer in Ephrata store||Jul '14||Ephrata mom||1|
|Moving to Columbia||Jul '14||Information||2|
|Suburban Life: Towns band together to share lov...||Jul '14||Black dude||1|
Find what you want!
Search Wrightsville Forum Now