A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.Full Story
#163230 Oct 15, 2012
Glenn Beck, like Hannity and the FoxNews people realize that hate sells and is at the core of Republicaqn tea bagger racists extremism.
They are just marketing themselves to a crowd and Limbaugh (the most vulgar human on the planet) understood this years ago.
#163233 Oct 15, 2012
Id like for you to explain to us how Obama undermined the US in libya??
mabey you could add a commentary on the arab spring, to show me how silly and simple your veiws on the middle east really are.
things that are safe to say
1>much of (but not all) of the people in the middle east hate the US government.
2> MOST people over there realize the Us is there only for the resources.
3> the ground invasions of iraq and afghanistan were HUGE mistakes...
#3 can be backed up by polls.
ps: I dont expect you to repond to this post with anything new.
I have already proven you are WAYYYYYY short on real knowledge beyond what talking points come off the faux tube.
#163234 Oct 15, 2012
Thank God we live in a country where free speech is acceptable. This is what keeps us safe from the Government media complex that other countries have. Why do you think websites are banned in Iran and other countries? I'm glad we can hear all sides of the argument. I want to hear what al sharpton and rev wright and jesse jackson have to say. At times they all can make a point we should think about, be critical of the content, not the source. Educate yourself to think outside of the Liberal box.
#163235 Oct 15, 2012
We can stop at your #3: polls don't decide everything as has been demonstrated in this topic.
#163236 Oct 15, 2012
this week i call them, the bengazi's!!
because of thier coriagraphed feined outrage.
Id have only have taken them seriously if this WAsNT an election season. and they were expressing JUST condolences instead of making this a talking point.
since those guys have been raking this one over the coals??
id say THE right side is the side that is being in INconsiderate of the families, just by politicizing it.
shame on you right wingers...
I wonder what the families thinK??
#163237 Oct 15, 2012
You dumb tranny, you are an uninformed chongo; gays have the same rights to marry as anyone else so stop with your crying go have a banana. Oh Isaw your picture and it's exactly how I pictured you!
Hurry and pull out your worn out race card
#163238 Oct 15, 2012
Magic has all but gone from those.
#163239 Oct 15, 2012
quite right, but this is a poll on a quagmire, riccardo, it isnt going to GO BACK the other way 10 years 11 years into this war.
the election is MUCH MUCH closer.
#163240 Oct 15, 2012
you like what they have to say???
why dont you like what I have to say then??
on the election?? the fairness issues??
Im like a parrot, ill admit....
so your claim doesnt wash....
if YOU start pushing some of their PRObama lines??
then ill actually believe you.
ps; good line there at the end.....
I use that!!! plagarist!!(just kidding)
are you sure about that watching MSNBC thing??
because they dont have jesse jackson on their very often....
not after those retarded comments he made about Obama in 08'? remember that??
and to add to that ailienation??
his congressman son is under investigation now.
but then again congress has 500+ members??
so at least a few of them are bound to be under investigation at any particular point in time.
“I'm here with bells on.”
Since: Jul 12
#163243 Oct 15, 2012
'The will of the People' to put Unconstitutional Law in place, will not be served. Sorry about your luck, homophobe.
#163244 Oct 15, 2012
a new poll showed that the show is pretty much OVER for the bigots.
“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”
Since: Sep 12
#163245 Oct 15, 2012
Because you are an illiterate off topic dope.
#163246 Oct 15, 2012
I didn't necessary say I "like" what they say, I "like" the fact they have the right to say hate towards the country. Like the great Rev. Wright with is far fetched speculations. Sometimes they make a correct stand. But you are a parrot that doesn't know how to respond without asking 50 questions on one post 3 pages long. Do you have ADD? I don't like what you have to say a lot because you spend your time mocking people you don't agree with. You never post any links or facts to back up your crap. I hope that helps.
#163247 Oct 15, 2012
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAA That's a lot of stuff HAAAAAAAAA Wow Man!!
#163248 Oct 15, 2012
I would have shot the LPOWRTOTS..
The newest nod to Dodd would mark a site across town where he was detained after Union soldiers found encoded notes on him about their troop locations.
Since: Oct 12
#163249 Oct 15, 2012
Yeah. So ? Wee know them and LOVE them. What's your point ?
#163250 Oct 15, 2012
Why do the police think that they have superior rights than the rest of us?
Do they think that we have secret trials like in the old USSR?
She has every right to post a picture of her accuser online.
He faced her in "open court" his idenity was part of the public record so what's the problem?
#163251 Oct 15, 2012
Note the print at the bottom of the first pie graph dumdum, which states 12%, not 14%. That would be the gender of UNRESTRICTED reports of COMPLETED investigations. The overall numbers for victims are 95% women and 5% men. NOT 14. So you weren't referring to the pie chart, you were referring to some sort of hallucination.
YOU CANNOT PULL PARTIAL DATA AND CLAIM IT IS TOTAL DATA. ARE YOU CLEAR ON THIS POINT OR DO I NEED CRAYONS AND PRETTY COLORED PAPER?
The expectations that with the removal of DADT the REPORTS of gay assault will increase because the risk of eviction from service for homosexuality is not present.
THE ABOVE PARAGRAPH SAYS REPORTS, AS IN REPORTS, NOT TOTAL NUMBERS. NO MENTION IS MADE THAT THE NUMBER OF INSIDENTS WILL RISE. JUST THE REPORTS. AND THE REASON IS STATED CLEARLY IN THE SAME SENTENCE. THIS IS NOT GAY TWIRL, JUST YOU BEING TOO STUPID TO READ A SINGLE SENTENCE AND COME UP WITH A VALID CONCLUSION FROM THE INFORMATION IN THAT SENTENCE. ARE YOU CLEAR ON THIS POINT OR DO I NEED CRAYONS AND PRETTY COLORED PAPER?
Do I need to read the above paragraphs to you or get out the crayons and pretty colored paper?
Once again, do you need some crayons and pretty paper or is the meaning of the above statement clear enough to sink in to your thick as pigshit skull?
You have got to be the worlds most tiresome idiot. The only thing twirling in here is the tail spin of the WWI biplane you brought to a modern day dogfight.
#163252 Oct 15, 2012
The YouTube spot that is found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Reminds me of Douglas Tesitor and Gene Murabito when they have or still do speak to certain member's of the public in private and in public at city council meetings.
There behavior has chased away residents and voters who do not believe anything the City Council has to say on any subject, some have said their just a pack O Liars.
#163253 Oct 15, 2012
but you keep replying anyways?? wow!!
you dont hafta ya know??
Add your comments below
|CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10)||4 hr||Tina Kauffman||16,009|
|Kim Kardashian Facing Fur-ious Protest At Calab... (Apr '12)||Mon||Animal and humaine||6|
|CA California seeks to ban free, single-use carryo... (Jun '10)||Sep 28||No Time for Tea||5,084|
|Rudy Hernandez of Santa Maria, 1948-2014||Sep 28||Susan Garcia||1|
|Judge OKs Court-Appointed Attorney For Lead Def...||Sep 27||mom||3|
|CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10)||Sep 27||Bucketeers||7,965|
|Review: Mandarich Law Group (Sep '11)||Sep 26||advocate||24|
Find what you want!
Search Woodland Hills Forum Now