Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision

There are 313963 comments on the Newsday story from Jan 22, 2008, titled Thousands Protest Roe V. Wade Decision. In it, Newsday reports that:

Thousands of abortion opponents marched from the National Mall to the Supreme Court on Tuesday in their annual remembrance of the court's Roe v. Wade decision.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

Ink

Havertown, PA

#313287 Oct 15, 2013
buckwheat wrote:
<quoted text>I honestly believe the world is beyond fixing. Also, it's selfish to bring unwanted kids into it.
The world population in 2006 was 6.68 billion people. It took only 47 years to double. It's increasing now by 211,000 persons per day and rising.
The world population by 2039 could be 8.0 to 13 billion.
Can you imagine the crime rate when we run out of space?
BTW, gangs and criminals are bursting our prisons at the seams. There will be more of those, too.
The population growth in the US is going down.

Just because the mother doesn't want it, that doesn't mean nobody does. There are thousands of couples wanting to adopt a baby and they are all being aborted. They are going to other countries to adopt children.
No Relativism

Pittsburgh, PA

#313288 Oct 15, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's try it my way. It's more accurate.
Is it a mental block not to be able to admit that the majority of unwanted, living embryos are the size of a Tic Tac when terminated? Please tell me you know the difference between an 8wk embryo, a 40wk fetus, and a newborn; that you only use these comparisons to make yourself feel better about your extreme position.
Katie V.: "Please tell me you know the difference between an 8wk embryo, a 40wk fetus, and a newborn"

Do you know the difference between a toddler, teenager and post-menopausal woman?
_________

Katie V.: "...size of a Tic Tac..."

"Drew Barrymore picked out her daughter Olive's name when she was still in the womb. On Thursday's episode of "The Ellen DeGeneres Show," Will Kopelman's wife explained that their 10-week-old BABY GIRL was named for her size AT THE TIME.

"I never would have guessed that would have been the name," the 37-year-old actress said. "But I was reading a book with my husband. I was three months pregnant and they said your BABY is the size of an olive, and that was it. We never looked back."

http://www.today.com/entertainment/drew-barry...

_______

Of course lesbian proabort Ellen Degenerate had to get her stab in there by referring to baby Olive as "IT."

"IT could have been named kidney bean?" - Ellen

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313289 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
"You said "a human" is in the womb. If that human being (synonym for a human) is female, isn't mom dictating DEATH to another female?"

There is no mother, unless she already has given birth, or adopted. What that woman is doing, is making her own choice. There are TWO choices. You do know that, right?

"You get all wee-weed up over a uterus."

No, I don't. That is simply another of your many lies. And what is with the childish phrases? You are far too old for "wee-wee" and the like. Grow up.

"Meanwhile, I'm concerned over the LIFE of a baby female."

No, you're not. You're concerned with having your religious beliefs imposed on everyone, and you are revering the idea of the fetus over the woman who is carrying it. You don't give two shits about the born, and I'm sorry, but that is in no way "pro-life".
Feminist my ass..........
No Relativism

Pittsburgh, PA

#313290 Oct 15, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, passing off half-quotes out of context IS "dumbassery at it's [SIC] finest."
<spit>
You say stupid shet all the time.

You are known for your dumbassery.

You're a joke.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#313291 Oct 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
Since that is not my position, I'm neither proud nor ashamed of it. YOU should be ashamed, lying about my position, but I doubt you are.
I am QUITE proud of supporting a citizen's civil rights, as anyone normal would be.
You support a citizen's civil rights even if it means another human being has to die. Be proud, stay proud but that is nothing to be proud of.
No Relativism

Pittsburgh, PA

#313292 Oct 15, 2013
Katie wrote:
<quoted text>
The Tic Tac size of the embryo matters because it's factual compared to your emotional claims and comparisons that an embryo/fetus equals a neonate. Developing embryos and fetuses are not included in the species until live birth occurs. Until live birth, all you have is a pregnancy with potential of a live birth.
There is no human being in the womb. There is no son or daughter in the womb. There is potential, if all goes well. Haven't you learned from others' heartbreaks? You can want the baby until your heart bleeds rose petals, but if there is no live birth, there is no newborn. All there is, is a lost potential.
Call it cold, call it ugly, but stop dressing up your emotional extremism as reality and thinking it's any warmer or prettier.
Katie V.: "There is no human being in the womb."

DNA analysis results have proven your wrong. Long ago. Keep up.

_______

Katie V.: "There is no son or daughter in the womb."

"It's A Girl!"...."It's A Boy!"... www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com

_____

Katie V.: "There is potential"

Where does it say "It's A Potential Girl!" or "It's A Potential Boy!"

Oh, that's right, it doesn't. It says IS.

(unbelievable...more calendar quotes from Katie...)
Ink

Havertown, PA

#313293 Oct 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
It terminates the pregnancy. That the fetus dies at some point during the process doesn't change the fact that an abortion terminates the PREGNANCY, whether spontaneously or induced, by the removal of the products of conception.
Well said "the fetus dies"

One human being dies which is the product of conception. Certainly something to be proud of.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313294 Oct 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
You support a citizen's civil rights even if it means another human being has to die. Be proud, stay proud but that is nothing to be proud of.
If you want to talk about human beings dying to protect the civil rights of others, yes, I most certainly DO support the death penalty. And I'm proud of that, too.

But I wasn't talking about human beings dying. I was talking about a woman's right to make her own choice regarding her own uterus and pregnancy. The only human being involved, is the pregnant woman. And yes, I support her civil rights over the non-existent civil rights of an embryo or fetus.

Supporting people's civil rights most certainly IS something to be VERY proud of. But I don't expect someone as brainless as you are to understand why it's important to do so.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#313295 Oct 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
"You said "a human" is in the womb. If that human being (synonym for a human) is female, isn't mom dictating DEATH to another female?"
There is no mother, unless she already has given birth, or adopted. What that woman is doing, is making her own choice. There are TWO choices. You do know that, right?
"You get all wee-weed up over a uterus."
No, I don't. That is simply another of your many lies. And what is with the childish phrases? You are far too old for "wee-wee" and the like. Grow up.
"Meanwhile, I'm concerned over the LIFE of a baby female."
No, you're not. You're concerned with having your religious beliefs imposed on everyone, and you are revering the idea of the fetus over the woman who is carrying it. You don't give two shits about the born, and I'm sorry, but that is in no way "pro-life".
Feminist my ass..........
So who is the mother of that fetus? I thought all fetuses had a mother and a father.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313296 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Katie V.: "There is no human being in the womb."
DNA analysis results have proven your wrong. Long ago. Keep up.
_______
Katie V.: "There is no son or daughter in the womb."
"It's A Girl!"...."It's A Boy!"... www.TellMePinkOrBlue.com
_____
Katie V.: "There is potential"
Where does it say "It's A Potential Girl!" or "It's A Potential Boy!"
Oh, that's right, it doesn't. It says IS.
(unbelievable...more calendar quotes from Katie...)
"DNA analysis results have proven your wrong."

Repetition will not ever make this true. It's a lie.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313297 Oct 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
Well said "the fetus dies"
One human being dies which is the product of conception. Certainly something to be proud of.
The fetus is not a human being.

Support of an actual human beings civil rights IS something to be very proud of.

Your lies about my position are something you should be ashamed of, but you don't have the wit to understand that.
No Relativism

Pittsburgh, PA

#313298 Oct 15, 2013
Hooking Kids On Sex: Planned Parenthood starts "saturation process" in kindergarten

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighb...

Unreal. PP is focused on its future baby-killing pipeline for the sake of keeping its coffers full.

Kindergarten?!....Really?!.... proaborts suck.
Ink

Havertown, PA

#313299 Oct 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
If you want to talk about human beings dying to protect the civil rights of others, yes, I most certainly DO support the death penalty. And I'm proud of that, too.
But I wasn't talking about human beings dying. I was talking about a woman's right to make her own choice regarding her own uterus and pregnancy. The only human being involved, is the pregnant woman. And yes, I support her civil rights over the non-existent civil rights of an embryo or fetus.
Supporting people's civil rights most certainly IS something to be VERY proud of. But I don't expect someone as brainless as you are to understand why it's important to do so.
The fetus in the womb is a separate human being from the mother and if that mother kills her, she is killing a human being. Her own child. It is certainly legal but something to be proud of, I don't think so.
No Relativism

Pittsburgh, PA

#313300 Oct 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
"DNA analysis results have proven your wrong."
Repetition will not ever make this true. It's a lie.
You claim to focus on science.

Until you don't.

You see, science has clearly identified that those in the womb are unique, distinct human beings. You don't like "that" science, so you discount it.

You don't focus on science at all. Trying to blow smoke up other's arses isn't science. It's BS.

Denial of facts doesn't undo the facts. It only makes you like like an ignorant fool.
No Relativism

Pittsburgh, PA

#313301 Oct 15, 2013
Bitner wrote:
<quoted text>
The fetus is not a human being.
Support of an actual human beings civil rights IS something to be very proud of.
Your lies about my position are something you should be ashamed of, but you don't have the wit to understand that.
bHitler: "The fetus is not a human being."

You said "a human" (noun) is in the womb.

I have proven that Human (noun) and Human Being are synonyms.

You have FAILED MISERABLY to back your claim that they are not synonyms.

In other words, your above tweet is you contradicting your own words.

You're a mess.......
King Edward II

United States

#313302 Oct 15, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
Pregnancy is a process every woman can decide to continue or terminate. She has no obligation to gestate if she doesn`t want to.
<quoted text>
Hello Are you prepared yet?

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313303 Oct 15, 2013
Ink wrote:
<quoted text>
The fetus in the womb is a separate human being from the mother and if that mother kills her, she is killing a human being. Her own child. It is certainly legal but something to be proud of, I don't think so.
One, no, the fetus is not a human being.

Two, it is not separate so long as it is inside of her, attached to her, using her organ systems because it's own can't function yet.

Three, she is not a mother unless she's already given birth, or adopted. That's why their called mothers-to-be.

What I said I am proud of is my support of the civil rights of others.

Why must you be so dishonest?

Oh, that's right, lies are really all you've got to offer.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313304 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
You claim to focus on science.
Until you don't.
You see, science has clearly identified that those in the womb are unique, distinct human beings. You don't like "that" science, so you discount it.
You don't focus on science at all. Trying to blow smoke up other's arses isn't science. It's BS.
Denial of facts doesn't undo the facts. It only makes you like like an ignorant fool.
No, science has done no such thing.

Again, repetition of your lie will not make it true. And you are lying.

“Blessed Be”

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#313305 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
bHitler: "The fetus is not a human being."
You said "a human" (noun) is in the womb.
I have proven that Human (noun) and Human Being are synonyms.
You have FAILED MISERABLY to back your claim that they are not synonyms.
In other words, your above tweet is you contradicting your own words.
You're a mess.......
I'm not tweeting, Moron.

We are not on Twitter.

I have not failed.

And that is not what I claimed.

Why must you people twist what others say?

Oh, that's right, because lies are all you have to offer.

YOU are the mess.
buckwheat

Tulsa, OK

#313306 Oct 15, 2013
No Relativism wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a proabort like you would be anti-child.
You hate children because you killed your own. Overcompensating and shooting at the wrong target is unbecoming on you.
Get your shit together. And, leave the babies alone.
Thanks.
You're an idiot with nothing to add to a debate. You keep parroting your asinine mantra, and I doubt you even know what you're saying. Sounds like something you read on a sign and wrote it down so you could try to sound like you're informed. Dumb ass.

I have three healthy children, all grown, so you don't know you ass from Supreme Court ruling. BUT, I would not bring another one into this world under any circumstances.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Woodhaven Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mets talkback (Dec '07) 52 min Tage for two arrests 44,068
Adulttoyfunshop.com 4 hr Nathan 1
President Trump's first 100 days - Roadmap to D... 6 hr Wall specialist 3,626
Countdown to Impeachment 7 hr ThomasA 34
Giants talk back (Dec '06) 12 hr NYStateOfMind 6,485
Yankee talk back 4, or is it 5 (Aug '08) 12 hr Carlos 336,081
News Remember When Part 2.... Real Estate (Oct '16) Oct '16 JimTurano 1

Woodhaven Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Woodhaven Mortgages