Updated 5/8: Harassment case against ...

Updated 5/8: Harassment case against former prosecutor continues

There are 6 comments on the Winnetka Talk story from May 9, 2008, titled Updated 5/8: Harassment case against former prosecutor continues. In it, Winnetka Talk reports that:

“I compare this case to a reality TV show”

Former Oak Brook Police Sgt. Randy Mucha and Assistant State's Attorney Joe Ruggiero took the stand Wednesday as the civil complaint filed by Frances and Casey Gaik former village prosecutor Joan Mullins ground ... via Winnetka Talk

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Winnetka Talk.

88 Speedway

United States

#1 May 9, 2008
I am not sure what kind of bug these crazy people have up their arse, it will be nice to see this trial flush out the truth for once and all. Maybe the city can get their $2 million back when all is said and done.

88 S
Anon

Homewood, IL

#2 May 11, 2008
Nice to see this case come to a conclusion. Sounds like the years of mudslinging were put to the test and the verdict clearly shows the nonsense of even filing this lawsuit. Maybe Oakbrook can back to its business at hand. Perhaps an investigation of the current Chief of Police is now in order too.
Anon
Interesting

United States

#3 May 12, 2008
Gaiks deserved nothing from the start. Oak Brook was stupid to settle last year.
Watcher

AOL

#4 May 17, 2008
I read another thread about Casey and Fran Gaik and the Oak Brook Citizens for Better Government that mentioned how it took a jury of 12 NORMAL people to finally show that Gaiks were not harmed in any way.
Dick Maklin

AOL

#5 Jan 1, 2010
Does anyone know if I understand all this correctly? Wasn't the original lawsuit filed by Gaiks against a number of Oak Brook Village officials? And Oak Brook settled the case without admitting any fault on behalf of every defendant with the exception of Village Prosecutor Joan Mullins? And then Mrs Mullins went to trial and the Gaiks lost but Mrs Mullins had to pay for her own defense? And the Village of Oak Brook covered all of the other defendants attorneys fees? If this is right, then shouldn't Oak Brook reimburse Mrs Mullins for her attorneys fees?
Ron Spielman

Wheaton, IL

#6 Feb 10, 2016
Fran, please leave Randy alone

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Winnetka Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Nicole Howver LW Unlicensed Daycare Wed Acd 6
News Three people indicted for murder in Henderson C... Dec 12 Brett gotaas 1
Who do you support for U.S. House in Illinois (... (Oct '10) Nov 29 Willie 162
First Government Lease / Paul Graver (Sep '12) Nov 29 David R 11
Kenneka Jenkins was transgender Nov 21 ainjtown 4
Review: Evan Anthony Ryan Nov '17 EVAN ANTHONY RYAN 1
News Guilty verdict in fatal Des Plaines stabbing (Apr '10) Nov '17 Lowest of Them All 27

Winnetka Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Winnetka Mortgages