Rose's Law:<quoted text>Government gains value from marriage because that institution gives children a stable home.
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"
Circular reasoning.Even an infertile husband and wife can give an adopted child something no same sex couple can; a mother and father.
And so what?
Allowing gay marriage won't stop infertile straight couples from adopting children.
And single people can adopt.
Gay marriage and the "father/mother" issue are different.
Actually, an argument FOR gay marriage.<quoted text>And single parent households are good for society how? Is crime, juvenile delinquency, welfare dependence, uneducated dropouts and violence a social good?
And adopting. So, what's your point?<quoted text>There's no law stopping same sex couples from considering themselves married, even if the law doesn't permit government to recognize those unions as marriage.
It's clear you don't really feel that way.<quoted text>There's nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality but that's no justification for redefining marriage.
Yes, there is equality for all citizens in the 14th Amendment..
<quoted text>Our Constitution recognizes freedom of association, it doesn't create any right to define marriage laws for everyone based on sexual predilection.
<quoted text>The government has standards, DOMA defines marriage as one man and one woman.
<quoted text>Homosexuals have the same right to marry as everyone else, there is no gender equality right in the Constitution. There's no orientation test for marriage either.