Make Biking, Walking Safer

Make Biking, Walking Safer

There are 3 comments on the Hartford Courant story from Nov 7, 2010, titled Make Biking, Walking Safer. In it, Hartford Courant reports that:

The heartbreaking death of a much-admired Windsor Locks teenager in a car-bicycle collision should urge local and state officials and advocates to do everything possible to make roads safer for people who aren't in cars.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hartford Courant.

Motorist

Hartford, CT

#1 Nov 12, 2010
How would this have helped in this situation ? It was midnight, the kid was supposedly in the cross walk, a car driving to fast him.

This just seems like a ploy to get more money out of us taxpayers.
enelrad

Hartford, CT

#2 Nov 15, 2010
Don't we already have a bicyclist hemlet law in the State of Connecticut? Is it reasonable to expect a bicyclist on the road at or around midnight?
Motorist

Hartford, CT

#3 Nov 15, 2010
enelrad wrote:
Don't we already have a bicyclist hemlet law in the State of Connecticut? Is it reasonable to expect a bicyclist on the road at or around midnight?
You are right....the kid was 15 and the law requires anyone 15 & younger to wear a helmet. Not that a helmet really would have helped in this case.

Connecticut's Bicycle Helmet Law

Senate Bill No. 597
Public Act No. 97-46
An Act Requiring Children Fifteen Years of
Age and Under to Wear Bicycle Helmets
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
Subsection (b) of section 14-286d of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

(b)No child FIFTEEN years of age OR UNDER shall operate a bicycle on the traveled portion of any highway unless such child is wearing protective headgear which conforms to the minimum specifications established by the American National Standards Institute or the Snell Memorial Foundation's Standard for Protective Headgear for Use in Bicycling. Failure to comply with this section shall not be a violation or an offense. Failure to wear protective headgear as required by this subsection shall not be considered to be contributory negligence on the part of the parent or the child nor shall such failure be admissible in any civil action.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Windsor Locks Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Public Hearing Monday On 'Aggressive Panhandlin... Aug 25 Barbara 1
News Windsor Locks-East Windsor's Latest Houses For ... Aug 13 Ron Kress 1
News Teardown Of Terminal B At Bradley Airport Begin... Jul '15 Larry 1
Fireworks Jul '15 Laura 1
Old septic tanks Jul '15 Jan Harris 1
david bartini suffield,ct alcoholic & wifebeate... (Dec '13) Jul '15 Researcher 4
Travel Deals scam now in CT (Jun '11) Jun '15 emiligray 78
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Windsor Locks Mortgages