New Hampshire results silence NOM's M...

New Hampshire results silence NOM's Maggie Gallagher

There are 13 comments on the www.boxturtlebulletin.com story from Mar 22, 2010, titled New Hampshire results silence NOM's Maggie Gallagher. In it, www.boxturtlebulletin.com reports that:

On March 10th, National Organization for Marriage’s Maggie Gallagher was euphoric. She was joyously reporting that the residents of New Hampshire had voted to reject same-sex marriage

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.boxturtlebulletin.com.

“Son of Abraham”

Since: Aug 07

Natural Deviant

#1 Mar 22, 2010
There's something a bit odd about Maggie Gallagher. While her bigotry is nothing uncommon, her ghost-of-a-husband seems a bit strange. There's a HUGE red flag that goes up when it comes to her husband since even a simple Google search can't answer the question if she's married or not. I mean, from what I can tell she says she's married but it's the first time, ever, Google can't answer the question or give any information about it.

My bet is Maggie Gallagher is a lesbian.

“Son of Abraham”

Since: Aug 07

Natural Deviant

#2 Mar 22, 2010
Rev Ray T

Salina, KS

#3 Mar 23, 2010
McMike wrote:
Please a little respect for the women in our community. That is the face of pure hate. The bullish of the bulls would never show a face like that, only a child of Satan would.

Since: Apr 07

Philadelphia, PA

#4 Mar 23, 2010
When people like that "detector" person or that "eagle" person start with pro-gay people in threads ...

... articles like THIS are the reason that I slam them over, and over, and over, and leave them to choke on their own rotting vomit.

It is *ENTIRELY* because of the e-n-d-l-e-s-s, truly in-ter-min-a-ble anti-gay *LIES* that articles like this have to appear.

Over and over, the anti-gay are *LY-ING*. Do we really need articles like this that *SLAM* them and show just how egregiously they *are* lying?

I mean, this is not a kind article. It basically rips Maggie Gallagher a new asshole and makes vicious fun of her *TELLING SILENCE* on this matter. And ya know what? She deserves it.

I *love* seeing her lambasted like this because these people just. can't. shut. their. mouths. and accept when they LOSE. They spin so much BS and they have lied about so much and this article is exactly correct,*for them it's all about the lies and about a perception that they are "winning" since it's the anti-gay* who turn this endlessly into a contest.

Their biggest lie is the "31 states" lie, which *bypasses and LIES about* the fact that the nation is basically evenly split on gay marriage ...

... and, as an editorial here and there has suggested and as is very slowly coming to light, would be *IN FAVOR* if the entire United States of America weren't being *LIED* to about the ramifications of gay marriage.

I've seen it theorized that about 60% or more of the population would *probably be for gay marriage* if *LIES* about what it will promote societally were removed from these equations.

And the sooner it finally hits someone with an IQ that the anti-gay *should be sued for those lies*, the sooner this matter can move on. I am (as I've said a hundred times) waiting for the *day* that I see a major pro-gay source say they're going to sue because those lies are *damaging the livelihood of a minority about whom they are not true*. And believe me, I will keep waiting for that day. I have no problem waiting for that day. To me, elements of this "movement" or whatever it is will turn from *stupid* to intelligent the day they make that realization.

Since: Apr 07

Philadelphia, PA

#5 Mar 23, 2010
Come on, anti-gay, come into this thread and just *try* your horse shit. Please. The article contains all the statistics needed to make you look *stupid*. Want to play that game? You keep acting like you're "winning" something here. These statistics were mentioned in another thread and *lied about* by anti-gay posters *there*, too.

You really thought the pro-gay would let that matter rest? You really thought so?

You thought they'd let that slip by?

So now that this article is national (really, in fact, world) news, let's see you spin this. I can't wait to see the *crap* you come up with to pretend this did not *lose completely* in New Hampshire. End of statement.

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

#6 Mar 23, 2010
McMike wrote:
There's something a bit odd about Maggie Gallagher. While her bigotry is nothing uncommon, her ghost-of-a-husband seems a bit strange. There's a HUGE red flag that goes up when it comes to her husband since even a simple Google search can't answer the question if she's married or not. I mean, from what I can tell she says she's married but it's the first time, ever, Google can't answer the question or give any information about it.
My bet is Maggie Gallagher is a lesbian.
You surprise me McMike. Using "lesbian" as an insult?
ME_D_A

Lebanon, NH

#7 Mar 23, 2010
Hi All, I am a lesbian from NH and i am really glad that I can get married in this state. But you want to know what keeps me up at night? Poor education in our state, lack of jobs, and health care. There are more important things we need to worry about other than the fact that my partner and i need to decide on a May or June wedding.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#8 Mar 23, 2010
Sorry, but Box Turtle has this one wrong. They haven't shut up. There is no lie to bold for them to tell, no defeat too embarrassing for them to spin. Because there's always another homophobic sucker out there who can be persuaded to send them a contribution to their campaign. And if they ended their campaign, they'd no longer have a livelihood.

Indeed, there's an ad for NOM on my screen right now, targeted at repealing marriage equality in New Hampshire.

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#9 Mar 23, 2010
Rev Ray T wrote:
<quoted text>
Please a little respect for the women in our community. That is the face of pure hate. The bullish of the bulls would never show a face like that, only a child of Satan would.
Agreed. Truly, Ms. Gallagher is one of the most vile and disgusting individuals around--right up there with Ann Coulter. For a person so devote her life to working (and lying) to persecute people is unimaginable to me.

Of course, it appears that the knuckle-dragging idiots we're forced to share the earth with are making her a very, very wealthy vile and disgusting person. Since she clearly has no morals or self-respect, and the money's clearly good for selling your soul to evil, she's not likely to stop any time soon....

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#10 Mar 23, 2010
RalphB wrote:
<quoted text>
You surprise me McMike. Using "lesbian" as an insult?
He wasn't using it as an insult. It was an interesting observation.

In much the same say that we discovered Anita Bryant's husband and daughter (?) were both gay, it seems to be only a matter of time before we find out the impetus behind those that rail such venomous hate and lies against their fellow citizens.

Think about all the "christian" fundie preachers that spend their days decrying the evils of homosexuality, and yet, time and time again, they get caught fvcking guys in back rooms or, worse, molesting the young ones entrusted to them by their idiot parents.

Those that scream the most are ALWAYS the ones with the most to hide. I'm guessing Ms. Gallagher is either a closeted Lesbian that hates herself for it or she's madly in love with a gay guy that, obviously, can't love her back. Why some people in those situations go all bat-sh*t crazy and start venting their rage on the world instead of in a therapist's office is a mystery to me, but it happens.

“Son of Abraham”

Since: Aug 07

Natural Deviant

#11 Mar 23, 2010
RalphB wrote:
<quoted text>
You surprise me McMike. Using "lesbian" as an insult?
LOL! That's like trying to say I insult gay men by saying homophobic men are homosexuals. I'm not trying to put down lesbians although with Maggie on their roster it's a definite downgrade.

Since: Apr 07

Philadelphia, PA

#12 Mar 23, 2010
nhjeff wrote:
Sorry, but Box Turtle has this one wrong. They haven't shut up. There is no lie to bold for them to tell, no defeat too embarrassing for them to spin. Because there's always another homophobic sucker out there who can be persuaded to send them a contribution to their campaign. And if they ended their campaign, they'd no longer have a livelihood.
Indeed, there's an ad for NOM on my screen right now, targeted at repealing marriage equality in New Hampshire.
Awesome opportunity to rub in several things, including that they LOST this, that "Ms." Gallagher is conveniently silent, that they are lying, and that statistics -- shockingly, jaw-droppingly -- prove it.

I don't mean, by the way, "rub it in" pointlessly; I mean *to the public*, reiterate to the public each and every time. I'm speaking rhetorically, it's part of what we're all doing here.

Every time NOM opens its mouth, there's a GOLDEN opportunity to show again exactly how they are lying. That's what I admired about this article. It was clear this article has zero time for BS, and was ready to underline and reinforce its every claim. Good for them.

I mean, how is NOM not a hate group? How in the name of god are they not a hate group? They want to *take away families' rights and damage the families and their little children*? This has gone beyond harassment, and if this effort got *anywhere at all*, should be dealt with in the harshest legal terms imaginable.

Keep damaging them in the courts, over, and over, and over. Make them pay *by the week* for what they're doing, attempting to destroy families. They might as well be the KKK, pure and simple.

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

#13 Mar 24, 2010
McMike wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! That's like trying to say I insult gay men by saying homophobic men are homosexuals. I'm not trying to put down lesbians although with Maggie on their roster it's a definite downgrade.
Sorry if I mis-judged your post. I most likely mis-interprated what you were saying. It did not occur to me that you were comparing her to the usual male homophobe. And frankly, I had not ever considered that female homophobes would have the same reason for hating us. Just never struck me that way until you said it just now.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Windham Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
weed for sale (Nov '11) 5 min christiancanavan 13
News Kinder Morgan shrinks proposed pipeline size Sun John Gorham- Rich... 1
News Clinton campaign blasts New York Times in lette... Aug 1 Fart news 8
Election Who do you support for U.S. House in New Hampsh... (Oct '10) Jul 15 Grunt56 31
News Sound Off (Jun '07) Jul 15 malcolm1951 3
News Police: Loose dog at motel leads to drug arrest Jun '15 wichita-rick 9
Will the circumferential highway be revived in ... (Aug '14) Jun '15 Nhplaya 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Windham Mortgages