Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52052 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42946 Oct 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Where am I trying to push my faith into secular law?
I'm simply saying that sodomy is medically harmful and unhealthy, and relationally degrading. And that marriage defines a distinct relationship in society based on the evolutionary science of mating behavior.
The real problem is the homosexual demand that science and reason be segregated from law, NOT the inclusion of religion!
Just a heads up, Ben and Tom do not represent the bulk of the Founding Fathers. In every community across our country there are scores and hundreds of churches serving their community with compassion and sacrifice. Your hateful bigotry is blinding you honey...
Finally, did you just assert that my orientation is changing?
And in an effort to insult me you call me a sodomite?
Interesting.
Smile.
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO...Now why would anyone suspect a guy who attended a theology school and spent 30 years of his life as a pastor of having a theocratic agenda? Why would anyone suspect a guy who apparently thinks about little else (17,500+ posts) of being a bubble or two off plumb? Who would ever dream that a guy who believes women haven't evolved to lead would be mired in archaic thought? How could anyone draw the conclusion that a guy who routinely equates sodomy to same-sex marriage fancies himself in a position to preach to others what should and should not be acceptable (and legal) bedroom behavior? Greg, why is this issue of such vital importance to you, personally? What was it that inspired your crusade? Why do you devote as much time and energy as you do to this? I can't be the only one who'd be fascinated by your answers to these simple questions.
So when I present the evidence of medical and scientific fact, my faith deletes the validity of those facts?

You have an insurmountable problem.

Science and faith agree on the oxymoron of ss marriage. You have to ignore science and denigrate faith in the vain attempt to excuse the inexcusable.

Moreover, we are talking about the most important relationship of society, marriage, and the most vulnerable member of society, children. My concern equates to the most esteemed defenders of humanity in human history. You are regulated to defending the sexual abuse of another person and the idiotic attempt to equate a sterile duplicate half with the historic cross cultural practice of marriage.

You are welcome to wallow in your perverted denial. However when you seek to impose your delusions and perversion on society, moral and reasoned citizens stand up and say no.

That is the simple answer to your simpleton question.

Smile.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“"Not all who wander are lost."”

Since: Mar 10

freshroast666@gmail.com

#42947 Oct 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Where am I trying to push my faith into secular law?
I'm simply saying that sodomy is medically harmful and unhealthy, and relationally degrading. And that marriage defines a distinct relationship in society based on the evolutionary science of mating behavior.
The real problem is the homosexual demand that science and reason be segregated from law, NOT the inclusion of religion!
Just a heads up, Ben and Tom do not represent the bulk of the Founding Fathers. In every community across our country there are scores and hundreds of churches serving their community with compassion and sacrifice. Your hateful bigotry is blinding you honey...
Finally, did you just assert that my orientation is changing?
And in an effort to insult me you call me a sodomite?
Interesting.
Smile.
<quoted text>
So when I present the evidence of medical and scientific fact, my faith deletes the validity of those facts?
You have an insurmountable problem.
Science and faith agree on the oxymoron of ss marriage. You have to ignore science and denigrate faith in the vain attempt to excuse the inexcusable.
Moreover, we are talking about the most important relationship of society, marriage, and the most vulnerable member of society, children. My concern equates to the most esteemed defenders of humanity in human history. You are regulated to defending the sexual abuse of another person and the idiotic attempt to equate a sterile duplicate half with the historic cross cultural practice of marriage.
You are welcome to wallow in your perverted denial. However when you seek to impose your delusions and perversion on society, moral and reasoned citizens stand up and say no.
That is the simple answer to your simpleton question.
Smile.
Somehow I missed the "medical and scientific fact" that should trump constitutional rights. You love saying you've presented evidence. Evidence of what? Same-sex attraction has existed for as long as our species. Does it play a role in procreative mating behavior? No. Does the fact that a same-sex couple cannot conventionally create offspring invalidate their need for companionship and love? No. Please feel free to cite evidence that supports the notion that people who are attracted to people of their same gender should be subject to a different set of laws. This should, as always, be very entertaining.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42948 Oct 19, 2013
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>Somehow I missed the "medical and scientific fact" that should trump constitutional rights. You love saying you've presented evidence. Evidence of what? Same-sex attraction has existed for as long as our species. Does it play a role in procreative mating behavior? No. Does the fact that a same-sex couple cannot conventionally create offspring invalidate their need for companionship and love? No. Please feel free to cite evidence that supports the notion that people who are attracted to people of their same gender should be subject to a different set of laws. This should, as always, be very entertaining.
You missed nothing. You ignore it and demand that the 98% of married couples that could procreate capitulate to ss couples who can NEVER mutually procreate.

You disqualify every distinction between ss couples and marriage except the number of people, you ignore the medical violation of design, you desecrate and trample on religious and cultural traditions, you censor the distinction that evolutionary science clearly distinguishes, and then turn around demand all the rights and privileges based on those very distinctions.

I simply point of the idiocy of that foolish attempt by the refusal of reality to adjust to your deception and denial.

Smile.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#42949 Oct 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
blah blah blah snipped
Eusebius said that it is lawful to lie and cheat for the cause of Christ: "I have repeated whatever may rebound to the glory, and suppressed all that could tend to the disgrace of our religion" (Chp. 31, Book 12 of Prae Paratio Evangelica).

Eusebius is one of Christ-insanities greatest teachers and KiMare has carried on the tradition of lying and deceiving for Jesus.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#42950 Oct 19, 2013
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO...Now why would anyone suspect a guy who attended a theology school and spent 30 years of his life as a pastor of having a theocratic agenda? Why would anyone suspect a guy who apparently thinks about little else (17,500+ posts) of being a bubble or two off plumb? Who would ever dream that a guy who believes women haven't evolved to lead would be mired in archaic thought? How could anyone draw the conclusion that a guy who routinely equates sodomy to same-sex marriage fancies himself in a position to preach to others what should and should not be acceptable (and legal) bedroom behavior? Greg, why is this issue of such vital importance to you, personally? What was it that inspired your crusade? Why do you devote as much time and energy as you do to this? I can't be the only one who'd be fascinated by your answers to these simple questions.
Nicely said. I suspect that KiMare is in prison and has nothing to do all day long except try to make good decent normal people feel worse than he does.
CDC

Waterloo, IL

#42951 Oct 19, 2013
Funny...I was about to say the same about you.
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Nicely said. I suspect that KiMare is in prison and has nothing to do all day long except try to make good decent normal people feel worse than he does.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
SS advocate

Joliet, IL

#42952 Oct 19, 2013
No PROS all CONS. SS marriage =wrong.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Ss advocate

Joliet, IL

#42953 Oct 19, 2013
No PROS only CONS. SS marriage=Wrong.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
big guy

New Lenox, IL

#42955 Oct 19, 2013
Ss advocate wrote:
No PROS only CONS. SS marriage=Wrong.
Maybe for you. But basic human rights is a pro.
Neighbor

Reddick, IL

#42956 Oct 19, 2013
big guy, I hear you on basic human rights. I don't think most folks would disagree with you. Not me anyway. But society is certainly comprised of people of various faiths, each needing to be respected as "their" human right. Am I wrong?

So here's where I get stuck on this subject: As a Christian, the words of God are presented in the bible. The bible says SS is wrong, forbids it. So can we take away from the beliefs/rights of Christians to support the belief/rights of SS supporters? That does not seem right, correct? This is where I get stuck.

People have the privilege of doing what they want, but people do not have the right to ignore/disrespect others Christian beliefs. So they look for weasel ways around it. I get a head ach talking about this.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
This And That

Dublin, CA

#42957 Oct 19, 2013
Neighbor wrote:
big guy, I hear you on basic human rights. I don't think most folks would disagree with you. Not me anyway. But society is certainly comprised of people of various faiths, each needing to be respected as "their" human right. Am I wrong?
So here's where I get stuck on this subject: As a Christian, the words of God are presented in the bible. The bible says SS is wrong, forbids it. So can we take away from the beliefs/rights of Christians to support the belief/rights of SS supporters? That does not seem right, correct? This is where I get stuck.
People have the privilege of doing what they want, but people do not have the right to ignore/disrespect others Christian beliefs. So they look for weasel ways around it. I get a head ach talking about this.
And do tell,what the hell does the bible have to do with secular marriage equality in America? Absolutely nothing,not to mention the bible does no such thing when it comes to homosexuality! Care to try again? This nation for the 100th time is a secular nation and not a theocracy! Now 14 states and counting,how many more in the coming year?

“"Not all who wander are lost."”

Since: Mar 10

freshroast666@gmail.com

#42958 Oct 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You missed nothing. You ignore it and demand that the 98% of married couples that could procreate capitulate to ss couples who can NEVER mutually procreate.
You disqualify every distinction between ss couples and marriage except the number of people, you ignore the medical violation of design, you desecrate and trample on religious and cultural traditions, you censor the distinction that evolutionary science clearly distinguishes, and then turn around demand all the rights and privileges based on those very distinctions.
I simply point of the idiocy of that foolish attempt by the refusal of reality to adjust to your deception and denial.
Smile.
Please explain exactly what a capitulation by opposite-sex amounts to, Greg. What is it you believe same-sex couples are demanding that will be so costly to opposite-sex married couples? I ignore the "medical violation of design"? That's hilarious, Greg! Tell me, do heterosexual couples ever engage in activities that are contrary to "design"? Should such activities be illegal? Should sexual behavior be limited only to procreative purposes by law? How does sanctioning same-sex marriage in any way desecrate or trample on religious or cultural traditions? Should your religious point of view be taken into consideration when laws are created or revised? What is evolutionary science to someone who takes the Genesis account literally? Whatl any of us Americans should demand, indeed what it is our duty to demand as Americans, is that each American is subject to the same rights and privileges we are guaranteed by the Constitution. What's clear is that you believe some people ought to be subject to different laws based on an arbitrary distinction. Are you gaining any ground on that front, Greg? Keep smiling. It only serves to better illustrate your Bible-based delusions.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42959 Oct 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You missed nothing. You ignore it and demand that the 98% of married couples that could procreate capitulate to ss couples who can NEVER mutually procreate.
You disqualify every distinction between ss couples and marriage except the number of people, you ignore the medical violation of design, you desecrate and trample on religious and cultural traditions, you censor the distinction that evolutionary science clearly distinguishes, and then turn around demand all the rights and privileges based on those very distinctions.
I simply point of the idiocy of that foolish attempt by the refusal of reality to adjust to your deception and denial.
Smile.
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>Please explain exactly what a capitulation by opposite-sex amounts to, Greg. What is it you believe same-sex couples are demanding that will be so costly to opposite-sex married couples?
I have listed the differences many times. It is a lie to pretend the two relationships are the same. You are demanding I accept your lie. No.
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>I ignore the "medical violation of design"? That's hilarious, Greg! Tell me, do heterosexual couples ever engage in activities that are contrary to "design"? Should such activities be illegal?
Why in the world would it matter who engages in harmful, unhealthy and demeaning acts? Are you really suggesting that because one group does something wrong, it makes it okay for everyone? Abuse is wrong, why are you attempting to excuse it?
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>Should sexual behavior be limited only to procreative purposes by law?
Where did I assert any such thing?
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>How does sanctioning same-sex marriage in any way desecrate or trample on religious or cultural traditions? Should your religious point of view be taken into consideration when laws are created or revised?

Civilized people are always considerate of others. However, in this instance, it is the special place of a relationship that crosses every single culture and major religion in human history.

[QUOTE who="MirthMenace"] <quoted text>What is evolutionary science to someone who takes the Genesis account literally?
You don't know how I take Genesis. What does it matter to someone who is denying evolutionary science?
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>Whatl any of us Americans should demand, indeed what it is our duty to demand as Americans, is that each American is subject to the same rights and privileges we are guaranteed by the Constitution. What's clear is that you believe some people ought to be subject to different laws based on an arbitrary distinction. Are you gaining any ground on that front, Greg? Keep smiling. It only serves to better illustrate your Bible-based delusions.
I agree.

We do however have special rights for minorities. Marriage is one of those.

Ss couples don't qualify based on factual distinctions. And the reason I bother you is that reality is the ground I stand on. Your gay twirling does nothing to move it.

What really gets your goat, is that science and the Bible go hand in hand on this.

Smile.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Dick Face Durbin

Romeoville, IL

#42960 Oct 19, 2013
Okay, enough is enough you Homo's need to get a life take a deep breath and then realize, no one cares you are gay.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#42961 Oct 19, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
And the reason I bother you is that reality is the ground I stand on. Your gay twirling does nothing to move it.
It's comical how you perceive your opinions to be reality. This from the disgraced pastor with three forged sanity certificates and a schizophrenic personality...
jennifer LIZA

Bangladesh

#42962 Oct 20, 2013
PLZ CALL ME.I LIKE LESBIAN AND GAY SEX.I AM A REAL GIRL.I LIKE MATURE LESBIAN SEX.PLZ PLZ CONTACT ME 01620239365,01787107600

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
jennifer LIZA

Bangladesh

#42963 Oct 20, 2013
I M A BANGLADESHI GIRL.I LIKE A LESBIAN AND GAY SEX.I M A GIRL PLZ CONTACT ME 01620239365,01787107600

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#42964 Oct 20, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
It's comical how you perceive your opinions to be reality. This from the disgraced pastor with three forged sanity certificates and a schizophrenic personality...
LOL,

And that explains all the attention I garnish on here...

Especially from a poster who names himself after my non-functioning vagina and calls two penis' and no vagina a marriage!

Judged:

14

14

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Safe house

Joliet, IL

#42965 Oct 20, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL,
And that explains all the attention I garnish on here...
Especially from a poster who names himself after my non-functioning vagina and calls two penis' and no vagina a marriage!
Truth be Told.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Moses

Joliet, IL

#42966 Oct 20, 2013
This And That wrote:
<quoted text>
And do tell,what the hell does the bible have to do with secular marriage equality in America? Absolutely nothing,not to mention the bible does no such thing when it comes to homosexuality! Care to try again? This nation for the 100th time is a secular nation and not a theocracy! Now 14 states and counting,how many more in the coming year?
the bible does not support ss marriage. Theocracy is our nation.

Judged:

13

13

13

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wilmette Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Old Evanston (Aug '09) Jan 11 Julia 20
Review: iLoveKickboxing - Skokie Dec 31 Eligood19 3
News Skokie man is charged with sexual assault of pa... (Sep '08) Dec 30 Anon 20
Who do you support for U.S. House in Illinois (... (Oct '10) Dec 25 CountryBoy 169
Nicole Howver LW Unlicensed Daycare (Jun '17) Dec '17 Acd 6
News Three people indicted for murder in Henderson C... Dec '17 Brett gotaas 1
River Grove Library (Feb '11) Dec '17 Lowest of Them All 82

Wilmette Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wilmette Mortgages