Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 Full story: CBS2 50,616

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Full Story
laughing man

UK

#40576 Jul 2, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Quite the day job, sell the house and go on the comedy circuit. You're going to be a HUGE star (with 3 and 4 year old boys who enjoy potty humour).
"Potty humor", eh? How Orwellian on your part. How absolutely Freudian.

Considering you're a member of the Cult of Colon, what do you think my prospects would be?

Would I bowl 'em over at the bath house?
laughing man

UK

#40577 Jul 2, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
Quit*.........damned auto-type.
Who do you think you're fooling?

Take it like a Pervert and say "I meant to do that!"

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#40578 Jul 2, 2013
Cults colon
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
"Potty humor", eh? llian on your part. How absolutely Freudian.
Considering you're a member of the Cult of Colon, what do you think my prospects would be?Would I bowl 'em over at the bath house?
My partner and I are gay, but we don't travel through life via the Hershey Highway.

You seem to have a plethora of information about colon cults and bath houses.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40582 Jul 2, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Just like the Religious people claimed that same sex marriage should not be allowed because its not allowed by the Bible and god. They where shot down. We as a Nation don't change laws or make laws based on religion. So why should Polygamy be made legal, becuase people of " Faith" pratice it?
Yup. You're just like them.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40583 Jul 2, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Again you have missed the boat skipper. One of the main objections to same sex marriage was that goes against a Biblical Marriage. Now if that lone objection was shot down, because we as a nation are in fact secular, and we don't change nor make laws based on religion. Why should we as a nation then allow ploygamy based on religion? Certian sects of the LDS church ( FLDS), Islam and Buddhism seem to be the only ones looking for the abolishment of Polygamy laws. Again we don't change or base laws on religion. Never have and never will.
You want to disallow polygamy based on religion. Same thing.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#40585 Jul 2, 2013
Yet another fine example of AGENDASTANDARD:
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Again you have missed the boat skipper. One of the main objections to same sex marriage was that goes against a Biblical Marriage. Now if that lone objection was shot down, because we as a nation are in fact secular, and we don't change nor make laws based on religion. Why should we as a nation then allow ploygamy based on religion? Certian sects of the LDS church ( FLDS), Islam and Buddhism seem to be the only ones looking for the abolishment of Polygamy laws. Again we don't change or base laws on religion. Never have and never will.
Brucie the gay parrot

UK

#40586 Jul 2, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
Cults colon <quoted text>
My partner and I are gay, but we don't travel through life via the Hershey Highway.
You seem to have a plethora of information about colon cults and bath houses.
In the closet!

IN THE CLOSET!!

GAG!

PUKE!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40588 Jul 2, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Wow you are stupid.
Great argument you have there fruitloops.
laughing man

UK

#40589 Jul 2, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Great argument you have there fruitloops.
I'm kinda ashamed to admit this, but when I first read Zero's I automatically genuflected.

It's destined for Sainthood, no question about it.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40590 Jul 2, 2013
laughing man wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm kinda ashamed to admit this, but when I first read Zero's I automatically genuflected.
It's destined for Sainthood, no question about it.
YUK!YUK!YUK! Ah good times!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40591 Jul 2, 2013
vicki wrote:
Glad that gays will now have the same rights as heterosexual couples...just like the arguments of interracial couples back in the sixties...marriage will continue...the sky will not fall. The only thing that changes is equality ...they now have it.
A mutually sterile, duplicated gendered couple is not equal to a diverse gendered couple united as the most critical relationship in society.

And that is just the start of major distinctions between the relationships.

Clearly not the same, and clearly not equal.

“"Not all who wander are lost."”

Since: Mar 10

freshroast666@gmail.com

#40592 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
A mutually sterile, duplicated gendered couple is not equal to a diverse gendered couple united as the most critical relationship in society.
And that is just the start of major distinctions between the relationships.
Clearly not the same, and clearly not equal.
I'm gone for a few days and come back to see you're still vomiting up the same hairball over and over. You still have not explained in any rational terms why any two people, regardless of their gender, should not be able to become each other's legal next of kin.
wellwellwell

Round Lake, IL

#40594 Jul 2, 2013
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>I'm gone for a few days and come back to see you're still vomiting up the same hairball over and over. You still have not explained in any rational terms why any two people, regardless of their gender, should not be able to become each other's legal next of kin.
Because the great and powerful KiMare says so, dontcha know...~rolls eyes~. I thought every one knew this!
Brucie from MENSA

UK

#40595 Jul 2, 2013
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>I'm gone for a few days and come back to see you're still vomiting up the same hairball over and over. You still have not explained in any rational terms why any two people, regardless of their gender, should not be able to become each other's legal next of kin.
I wanna be related to your sphincter!!!!!!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40596 Jul 2, 2013
MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>I'm gone for a few days and come back to see you're still vomiting up the same hairball over and over. You still have not explained in any rational terms why any two people, regardless of their gender, should not be able to become each other's legal next of kin.
Go away for another few days or as long as you'd like, the facts I keep in your face will not change.

Ss couples are clearly not the same or equal to marriage.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40597 Jul 2, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>LOL you are going to be waiting for a long long time. You will get a faster result waiting at flying 2 x 4 at Lowes
What kind of moronic Jizzy activity is "waiting at flying 2 x 4 at Lowes"?

What a dope!
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#40598 Jul 2, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
What kind of moronic Jizzy activity is "waiting at flying 2 x 4 at Lowes"?
What a dope!
asshat
Zoro

Cambridge, IL

#40599 Jul 2, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Go away for another few days or as long as you'd like, the facts I keep in your face will not change.
Ss couples are clearly not the same or equal to marriage.
Why?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#40600 Jul 2, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text>Why?
If you
believe denying marriage to a relationship
will prevent love

If you
demand any committed relationship
has to be called marriage

If you
claim rights and benefits can only be acquired
by an imposition on marriage

If you
equate the diversity of two genders
with the redundancy of same genders

If you
desecrate the sacred tradition of all major religions
and violate the historic practice of every single culture in history

If you
believe a fundamental change to the building block of society
will have absolutely no affect

If you
think a law can change
the reality of crucial distinctions in relationships

If you
pretend duplicating sexuality
is the same as blending masculinity and femininity

If you
condemn some children to parents of only one gender
and deliberately deny some children one natural parent

If you
ignore the design of sexual union
to manipulate a harmful act

If you
violate evolution's law of reproduction
to equate a genetic dead end

If you
risk the healthiest human relationship
to include one of the unhealthiest

If you
parallel the sole birthplace of every other relationship
with one that can reproduce none

If you
dilute all these things
down to just 'a committed relationship of two people'

Then, and only then, can you equate same-sex unions with marriage.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#40601 Jul 2, 2013
Zoro wrote:
<quoted text> asshat
YUK!YUK!YUK! Too funny! "Waiting at flying 2 x 4 at Lowes"?

Seriously. What kind of moronic Jizzy activity is that?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wilmette Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
telenetsystems.us 2 hr Amy 1
www.telenetsystems.us 3 hr Tim Rapagolia 2
Ray Bernero Tue concered 5
McScambells Blog Sucks! Tue poet 4
R.McScambell ,Sean Sullivan, Serpico Mon the Red Light Scam 6
American News Post Investigate McCambell Mon Schiller Park Blo... 7
Thillens faced DUI, property destruction charges Oct 20 MIKETOUHY 1
Wilmette Dating
Find my Match

Wilmette Jobs

Wilmette People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Wilmette News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Wilmette

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]