Former tipstaff to run for magistrate

Former tipstaff to run for magistrate

There are 134 comments on the New Pittsburgh Courier story from Apr 2, 2009, titled Former tipstaff to run for magistrate. In it, New Pittsburgh Courier reports that:

Howard Organ said his 23 years of experience working in the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court system, his subsequent legal education and his commitment to the community make him an ideal candidate for district magistrate.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at New Pittsburgh Courier.

First Prev
of 7
Next Last
Diana

Johnstown, PA

#1 Apr 9, 2009
I think he is an excellent choice for District Judge. I know this guy from years ago, and he is very fair and concerned about the welfare of people, he is who we need in this community, everyone needs to think about who they are voting for before they pull that lever, He is one of us, he worked hard and know the struggle, someone of them who are in office don't have a clue.
Diana

Johnstown, PA

#2 Apr 9, 2009
Howard W. Organ that is
Supporter

Pittsburgh, PA

#3 Apr 10, 2009
Judge Schricker is a fantastic Judge. Period!

*Mr. Schricker’s commitment and dedication to the communities he serves is impeccable and surpasses any politician in theses communities.
*Mr. Schricker has committed himself to assisting citizens with a gauntlet of issues and community project.
*Mr. Schrickers, concern for the citizens to succeed is prevalent in his understanding of the communities he serves.

In the Woodland Hills Community, the first encounter most citizens have is with Judge Schricker, but not as a Judge. They see him as a fair and decent guy, that is helping our communities in some form. And with this as a positive encounter for us citizens, this allots for a good view and representation for “OUR JUDGE”

- Judge Schricker, has placed strong emphases on absent landlords and property owners. His foresight and willingness to work with borough councils, code enforcement and police officers is excellent. His heavy hand, on these individuals has made a better quality of life for the citizens.
- Judge Schrickers, Commitment to the Woodland Hills Community as a whole with every growing concern with our school district builds confidence in his office and ability to help correct our concerns. Attending meetings about the Woodland Hills School District, with Mr. Schricker present at these meetings was fantastic to see.

_In the previously written post-“He is one of us, he worked hard and know the struggle”, this statement can be applied to Judge Schricker as well. His involvement in our community projects, gives him the understanding of our problems.

_In the previously written post-“someone of them who are in office doesn’t have a clue.” I agree that some politicians do not have a firm understanding. But once again, the solid foundation that Judge Schricker, has applied to his term for the willingness to understand situations is excellent.

_In the previously written post-“everyone needs to think about who they are voting for before they pull that lever” People should investigate, and really consider the commitment and dedication that Judge Schricker has applied to the Communities he serves.
*The Judges, commitment to ruling with the citizens best interests at heart with concern to Landlords and absent property owners, should be commended and praised.

I am a concerned citizens with many thanks and praises for Judge Schrickers service and heartfelt agenda for my community. His willingness to listen and understand the full extent of the issues in my community, gives confidence in success for my community.

VOTE SCHRICKER, MAY 19th
EP Voter

Pittsburgh, PA

#4 Apr 10, 2009
Gotta love how this is turned into a racial issue. "He is one of us, he worked hard and know the struggle”.

Get a life, you scumbags. Voting for schricker now
taxpayer

AOL

#5 Apr 10, 2009
His willingness to listen and understand the full extent of the issues in my community, That`s a bunch of shit it`s time for change.
Diana

Johnstown, PA

#6 Apr 10, 2009
For those who are still in the 15th century, and still engaging in the now see thru, antics of old time polictics, of division and seperation, of all the people that our constitution protects, it is time to continue, to change, and see thru the division, and seperation that has been heeped upon us "we the people" of this commonwealth. We the voters need a fresh start away from the 15th century way of thinking.
Diana

Johnstown, PA

#7 Apr 10, 2009
"Keep Change Alive"
Tara Reis

Pittsburgh, PA

#8 Apr 11, 2009
Supporter wrote:
Judge Schricker is a fantastic Judge. Period!
*Mr. Schricker’s commitment and dedication to the communities he serves is impeccable and surpasses any politician in theses communities.
*Mr. Schricker has committed himself to assisting citizens with a gauntlet of issues and community project.
*Mr. Schrickers, concern for the citizens to succeed is prevalent in his understanding of the communities he serves.
In the Woodland Hills Community, the first encounter most citizens have is with Judge Schricker, but not as a Judge. They see him as a fair and decent guy, that is helping our communities in some form. And with this as a positive encounter for us citizens, this allots for a good view and representation for “OUR JUDGE”
- Judge Schricker, has placed strong emphases on absent landlords and property owners. His foresight and willingness to work with borough councils, code enforcement and police officers is excellent. His heavy hand, on these individuals has made a better quality of life for the citizens.
- Judge Schrickers, Commitment to the Woodland Hills Community as a whole with every growing concern with our school district builds confidence in his office and ability to help correct our concerns. Attending meetings about the Woodland Hills School District, with Mr. Schricker present at these meetings was fantastic to see.
_In the previously written post-“He is one of us, he worked hard and know the struggle”, this statement can be applied to Judge Schricker as well. His involvement in our community projects, gives him the understanding of our problems.
_In the previously written post-“someone of them who are in office doesn’t have a clue.” I agree that some politicians do not have a firm understanding. But once again, the solid foundation that Judge Schricker, has applied to his term for the willingness to understand situations is excellent.
_In the previously written post-“everyone needs to think about who they are voting for before they pull that lever” People should investigate, and really consider the commitment and dedication that Judge Schricker has applied to the Communities he serves.
*The Judges, commitment to ruling with the citizens best interests at heart with concern to Landlords and absent property owners, should be commended and praised.
I am a concerned citizens with many thanks and praises for Judge Schrickers service and heartfelt agenda for my community. His willingness to listen and understand the full extent of the issues in my community, gives confidence in success for my community.
VOTE SCHRICKER, MAY 19th
I have been attending ALL board meetings for over two years and I have never seen Schricker at a meeting. In fact, it's well known that he tells parents to pull their children from the Woodland Hills schools and send them to alternative schools.
Jill Henkel

Philadelphia, PA

#9 Apr 11, 2009
I second Ms. Reis' comments; I have personally never seen Scott Schricker at a Woodland Hills School District School Board meeting, and I have attended MOST of the meetings also. I just spoke with a woman yesterday, who in Schricker's court was told my Magistrate Schricker to pull her children from Woodland Hills schools and send them to parochial school.

Richard Romanko is running for magisterial judge as well, and is the more qualified candidate, with a law degree and community involvement.

Scott Schricker has a BS in accounting.
NOT a law degree.
htgh

Pittsburgh, PA

#10 Apr 11, 2009
Schricker, is going to win. I have seen him at Woody High Meetings, Totally agree what was said by Supporter.

Schricker is involved in many community projects. And puts these p.o.s landlords in check.

Im voting for him
Funny

Pittsburgh, PA

#11 Apr 11, 2009
"I just spoke with a woman yesterday, who in Schricker's court was told my Magistrate Schricker to pull her children from Woodland Hills schools and send them to parochial school."

Did she get ruled against? Obviously
RENEWED

Pittsburgh, PA

#12 Apr 12, 2009
Isaw the garbage Romanko put on his campaign lit recently, this man is a hipacrit, he advocates for lower bonds and to get criminals out of jail all the time, so why is he condeming Schricker for the same thing.? Schricker has always been for the people and does what ever he can for the people in front of him. He is not the type to go dirty politics like Romanko, who has nothing else on Schricker.
RENEWED

Pittsburgh, PA

#13 Apr 12, 2009
Jill is nothing but a big mouth and a busy body, she has personal intrest in Romanko so of course she agrees with him!
RENEWED

Pittsburgh, PA

#14 Apr 12, 2009
Oh, and so what if Schricker or anyone else told someone to pull they"re kid from woodland hills, the district is still messed up, its no secret!!!!!!!!!! just maybe he said it because the parent wasnt getting any help from the administration as usual and was meant as an alternative!
Funny

Pittsburgh, PA

#15 Apr 12, 2009
RENEWED- Thankyou for stating fact, not fiction!
RENEWED

Pittsburgh, PA

#16 Apr 12, 2009
THERE IS NO REASON FOR SCHRICKER TO ATTEND ANY SCHOOL BOARD MEETING UNLESS HE IS INVITED,TO HELP SOLVE A PROBLEM OR SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE.HE DOESNT GET INVOLVED IN THE CUT THROAT LOCAL POLITICS EITHER, WHICH IS A GOOD THING.ITS NOT HIS JOB AND HE KNOWS IT.TAKE A LOOK AROUND THE MON VALLY, YOU WOULD BE HARD PRESSED TO FIND A MORE FAIR MINDED,COMMUNITY ORIENTED JUDGE. WE NEED HIM TO STICK AROUND CAUSE PEOPLE OF HIS CHARACTER ARE HARD TO FIND.LOOKING AT ROMANKOS CAMPAIGN LIT. HE JUST DOESNT HAVE IT,PERIOD.
Jill Henkel

Philadelphia, PA

#17 Apr 13, 2009
A big mouth? Absolutely. A busy body? You bet I am.
Confident enough to put my name up? FACT.

Richard Romanko IS the best candidate for magistrate.
Jill Henkel

Philadelphia, PA

#18 Apr 13, 2009
Big mouth? Absolutely. Busy body? You bet.
Confident enough to post under my own name? FACT.

Richard Romanko is the only qualified candidate in this magisterial district justice race.
Jill Henkel

Philadelphia, PA

#19 Apr 13, 2009
Big mouth? Absolutely. Busy body? You bet.
Confident enough to post under my own name? FACT.

Richard Romanko is the only qualified candidate in this magisterial district justice race.
Funny

Pittsburgh, PA

#20 Apr 13, 2009
"Richard Romanko is the only qualified candidate in this magisterial district justice race." -

WHY? State Facts

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 7
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wilkinsburg Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Susan Evashavik DiLucente (May '09) Jan 9 Jeff 29
Review: Emily Jean Mills Jan 3 EMILY JEAN MILLS 1
North Braddock, Ghetto slum or not?? You decide. (Sep '09) Nov '17 BrickNuce 100
organ harvesting stay alert Nov '17 Chester 4
Anyone know what shannon collier is up to these... Sep '17 Churchill1234 1
Fireman vs. Cops (Mar '17) Jul '17 acab 4
News SOS for BRT (Apr '17) Apr '17 the truth 1

Wilkinsburg Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wilkinsburg Mortgages